Aims. To assess the proportion of patients with distal radius fractures (DRFs) who were managed nonoperatively during the COVID-19 pandemic in accordance with the British Orthopaedic Association BOAST COVID-19 guidelines, who would have otherwise been considered for an operative intervention. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs and clinical notes of all patients with DRFs managed nonoperatively, following the publication of the BOAST COVID-19 guidelines on the management of urgent trauma between 26 March and 18 May 2020. Radiological parameters including radial height, radial inclination, intra-articular
We performed a retrospective study to determine
the effect of osteoporosis on the functional outcome of osteoporotic
distal radial fractures treated with a volar locking plate. Between
2009 and 2012 a total of 90 postmenopausal women with an unstable
fracture of the distal radius treated with a volar locking plate
were studied. Changes in the radiological parameters of 51 patients
with osteoporosis (group 1, mean age 66.9, mean T-score –3.16 (. sd. 0.56))
were not significantly different from those in 39 patients without
osteoporosis (group 2, mean age 61.1, mean T-score –1.72 (. sd. 0.57)).
The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score
at final follow-up was 11.5 (. sd. 12.2) in group 1 and 10.5
(. sd. 13.25) in group 2. The mean modified Mayo wrist score
at final follow-up was 79.0 (. sd. 14.04) in group 1 and 82.6
(. sd. 13.1) in group 2. However, this difference was not
statistically significant (p = 0.35 for DASH score, p = 0.2 for
modified Mayo wrist score). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression
analysis showed that only the
It is not clear which type of casting provides the best initial treatment in adults with a distal radial fracture. Given that between 32% and 64% of adequately reduced fractures redisplace during immobilization in a cast, preventing redisplacement and a disabling malunion or secondary surgery is an aim of treatment. In this study, we investigated whether circumferential casting leads to fewer fracture redisplacements and better one-year outcomes compared to plaster splinting. In a pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, two-period cluster-randomized superiority trial, we compared these two types of casting. Recruitment took place in ten hospitals. Eligible patients aged ≥ 18 years with a displaced distal radial fracture, which was acceptably aligned after closed reduction, were included. The primary outcome measure was the rate of redisplacement within five weeks of immobilization. Secondary outcomes were the rate of complaints relating to the cast, clinical outcomes at three months, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (using the numerical rating scale (NRS), the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) scores), and adverse events such as the development of compartment syndrome during one year of follow-up. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression for the analysis of the primary outcome measure.Aims
Methods
The degree of displacement of a fracture of the distal radius
is an important factor which can be assessed using simple radiographic
measurements. Our aim was to investigate the reliability and reproducibility
of these measurements and to determine if they should be used clinically. A 10% sample was randomly generated from 3670 consecutive adult
patients who had presented to University Hospitals of Leicester
NHS Trust between 2007 and 2010 with a fracture of the distal radius.
Radiographs of the 367 patients were assessed by two independent
reviewers. Four measurements of displacement of the fracture were recorded
and the inter-observer correlation assessed using the intra-class
correlation coefficient.Aims
Patients and Methods