Currently, periprosthetic fractures are excluded from the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) definition of atypical femoral fracture (AFFs). This study aims to report on a series of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) that otherwise meet the criteria for AFFs. Secondary aims were to identify predictors of periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures (PAFFs) and quantify the complications of treatment. This was a retrospective case control study of consecutive patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures between 2007 and 2017. Two observers identified 16 PAFF cases (mean age 73.9 years (44 to 88), 14 female patients) and 17 typical periprosthetic fractures in patients on bisphosphonate therapy as controls (mean age 80.7 years (60 to 86, 13 female patients). Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of PAFF. Management and complications were recorded.Aims
Patients and Methods
Little is known about the effect of haemorrhagic shock and resuscitation
on fracture healing. This study used a rabbit model with a femoral
osteotomy and fixation to examine this relationship. A total of 18 male New Zealand white rabbits underwent femoral
osteotomy with intramedullary fixation with ‘shock’ (n = 9) and
control (n = 9) groups. Shock was induced in the study group by
removal of 35% of the total blood volume 45 minutes before resuscitation
with blood and crystalloid. Fracture healing was monitored for eight weeks
using serum markers of healing and radiographs.Aims
Materials and Methods
