The anatomy and microstructure of the menisci
allow the effective distribution of load across the knee. Meniscectomy
alters the biomechanical environment and is a potent risk factor
for osteoarthritis. Despite a trend towards meniscus-preserving
surgery, many tears are irreparable, and many repairs fail. Meniscal allograft transplantation has principally been carried
out for pain in patients who have had a meniscectomy. Numerous case
series have reported a significant improvement in patient-reported
outcomes after surgery, but randomised controlled trials have not
been undertaken. It is scientifically plausible that meniscal allograft transplantation
is protective of cartilage, but this has not been established clinically
to date. Cite this article:
This review summarises the opinions and conclusions
reached from a symposium on infected total knee replacement (TKR)
held at the British Association of Surgery of the Knee (BASK) annual
meeting in 2011. The National Joint Registry for England and Wales
reported 5082 revision TKRs in 2010, of which 1157 (23%) were caused
by infection. The diagnosis of infection beyond the acute post-operative
stage relies on the identification of the causative organism by
aspiration and analysis of material obtained at arthroscopy. Ideal
treatment then involves a two-stage surgical procedure with extensive
debridement and washout, followed by antibiotics. An articulating
or non-articulating drug-eluting cement spacer is used prior to
implantation of the revision prosthesis, guided by the serum level
of inflammatory markers. The use of a single-stage revision is gaining popularity
and we would advocate its use in certain patients where the causative
organism is known, no sinuses are present, the patient is not immunocompromised,
and there is no radiological evidence of component loosening or
osteitis. It is our opinion that single-stage revision produces high-quality
reproducible results and will soon achieve the same widespread acceptance
as it does in infected hip arthroplasty.
