Osteochondritis Dissecans (OCD) is a condition
for which the aetiology remains unknown. It affects subchondral bone
and secondarily its overlying cartilage and is mostly found in the
knee. It can occur in adults, but is generally identified when growth
remains, when it is referred to as juvenile OCD. As the condition
progresses, the affected subchondral bone separates from adjacent
healthy bone, and can lead to demarcation and separation of its associated
articular cartilage. Any symptoms which arise relate to the stage
of the disease. Early disease without separation of the lesion results
in pain. Separation of the lesion leads to mechanical symptoms and
swelling and, in advanced cases, the formation of loose bodies. Early identification of OCD is essential as untreated OCD can
lead to the premature degeneration of the joint, whereas appropriate
treatment can halt the disease process and lead to healing. Establishing
the stability of the lesion is a key part of providing the correct
treatment. Stable lesions, particularly in juvenile patients, have
greater propensity to heal with non-surgical treatment, whereas
unstable or displaced lesions usually require surgical management. This article discusses the aetiology, clinical presentation and
prognosis of OCD in the knee. It presents an algorithm for treatment,
which aims to promote healing of native hyaline cartilage and to
ensure joint congruity. Take home message: Although there is no clear consensus as to
the best treatment of OCD, every attempt should be made to retain
the osteochondral fragment when possible as, with a careful surgical
technique, there is potential for healing even in chronic lesions Cite this article:
This annotation considers the place of extra-articular
reconstruction in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)
deficiency. Extra-articular reconstruction has been employed over
the last century to address ACL deficiency. However, the technique
has not gained favour, primarily due to residual instability and
the subsequent development of degenerative changes in the lateral
compartment of the knee. Thus intra-articular reconstruction has
become the technique of choice. However, intra-articular reconstruction
does not restore normal knee kinematics. Some authors have recommended
extra-articular reconstruction in conjunction with an intra-articular
technique. The anatomy and biomechanics of the anterolateral structures
of the knee remain largely undetermined. Further studies to establish
the structure and function of the anterolateral structures may lead
to more anatomical extra-articular reconstruction techniques that
supplement intra-articular reconstruction. This might reduce residual
pivot shift after an intra-articular reconstruction and thus improve
the post-operative kinematics of the knee.
Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and mosaicplasty are both claimed to be successful for the repair of defects of the articular cartilage of the knee but there has been no comparative study of the two methods. A total of 100 patients with a mean age of 31.3 years (16 to 49) and with a symptomatic lesion of the articular cartilage in the knee which was suitable for cartilage repair was randomised to undergo either ACI or mosaicplasty; 58 patients had ACI and 42 mosaicplasty. Most lesions were post-traumatic and the mean size of the defect was 4.66 cm2. The mean duration of symptoms was 7.2 years and the mean number of previous operations, excluding arthroscopy, was 1.5. The mean follow-up was 19 months (12 to 26). Functional assessment using the modified Cincinatti and Stanmore scores and objective clinical assessment showed that 88% had excellent or good results after ACI compared with 69% after mosaicplasty. Arthroscopy at one year demonstrated excellent or good repairs in 82% after ACI and in 34% after mosaicplasty. All five patellar mosaicplasties failed. Our prospective, randomised, clinical trial has shown significant superiority of ACI over mosaicplasty for the repair of articular defects in the knee. The results for ACI are comparable with those in other studies, but those for mosaicplasty suggest that its continued use is of dubious value.