Whether a combined anteroposterior fusion or a posterior-only fusion is more effective in the management of patients with Scheuermann’s kyphosis remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of these surgical approaches, and to evaluate the postoperative complications with the hypothesis that proximal junctional kyphosis would be more common in one-stage posterior-only fusion. A retrospective review of patients treated surgically for Scheuermann’s kyphosis between 2006 and 2014 was performed. A total of 62 patients were identified, with 31 in each group. Parameters were compared to evaluate postoperative outcomes using chi-squared tests, independent-samples Aims
Methods
Conventional growing rods are the most commonly
used distraction-based devices in the treatment of progressive early-onset
scoliosis. This technique requires repeated lengthenings with the
patient anaesthetised in the operating theatre. We describe the
outcomes and complications of using a non-invasive magnetically
controlled growing rod (MCGR) in children with early-onset scoliosis.
Lengthening is performed on an outpatient basis using an external remote
control with the patient awake. Between November 2009 and March 2011, 34 children with a mean
age of eight years (5 to 12) underwent treatment. The mean length
of follow-up was 15 months (12 to 18). In total, 22 children were
treated with dual rod constructs and 12 with a single rod. The mean
number of distractions per patient was 4.8 (3 to 6). The mean pre-operative
Cobb angle was 69° (46° to 108°); this was corrected to a mean 47°
(28° to 91°) post-operatively. The mean Cobb angle at final review
was 41° (27° to 86°). The mean pre-operative distance from T1 to
S1 was 304 mm (243 to 380) and increased to 335 mm (253 to 400)
in the immediate post-operative period. At final review the mean distance
from T1 to S1 had increased to 348 mm (260 to 420). Two patients developed a superficial wound infection and a further
two patients in the single rod group developed a loss of distraction.
In the dual rod group, one patient had pull-out of a hook and one
developed prominent metalwork. Two patients had a rod breakage;
one patient in the single rod group and one patient in the dual
rod group. Our early results show that the MCGR is safe and effective
in the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis with the avoidance
of repeated surgical lengthenings. Cite this article:
