The proportion of arthroplasties performed in the ambulatory setting has increased considerably. However, there are concerns whether same-day discharge may increase the risk of complications. The aim of this study was to compare 90-day outcomes between inpatient arthroplasties and outpatient arthroplasties performed at an ambulatory surgery centre (ASC), and determine whether there is a learning curve associated with performing athroplasties in an ASC. Among a single-surgeon cohort of 970 patients who underwent arthroplasty at an ASC, 854 (88.0%) were matched one-to-one with inpatients based on age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, BMI, and procedure (105 could not be adequately matched and 11 lacked 90-day follow-up). The cohort included 281 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) (32.9%), 267 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (31.3%), 242 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) (28.3%), 60 hip resurfacings (7.0%), two revision THAs (0.3%), and two revision TKAs (0.3%). Outcomes included readmissions, reoperations, visits to the emergency department, unplanned clinic visits, and complications.Aims
Methods
Accurate placement of the acetabular component is essential in
total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to determine
if the ability to achieve inclination of the acetabular component
within the ‘safe-zone’ of 30° to 50° could be improved with the
use of an inclinometer. We reviewed 167 primary THAs performed by a single surgeon over
a period of 14 months. Procedures were performed at two institutions:
an inpatient hospital, where an inclinometer was used (inclinometer
group); and an ambulatory centre, where an inclinometer was not
used as it could not be adequately sterilized (control group). We excluded
47 patients with a body mass index (BMI) of > 40 kg/m2,
age of > 68 years, or a surgical indication other than osteoarthritis
whose treatment could not be undertaken in the ambulatory centre.
There were thus 120 patients in the study, 68 in the inclinometer
group and 52 in the control group. The inclination angles of the acetabular
component were measured from de-identified plain radiographs by
two blinded investigators who were not involved in the surgery.
The effect of the use of the inclinometer on the inclination angle
was determined using multivariate regression analysis.Aims
Patients and Methods
Dislocation remains among the most common complications
of, and reasons for, revision of both primary and revision total
hip replacements (THR). Hence, there is great interest in maximising
stability to prevent this complication. Head size has been recognised
to have a strong influence on the risk of dislocation post-operatively.
As femoral head size increases, stability is augmented, secondary
to an increase in impingement-free range of movement. Larger head
sizes also greatly increase the ‘jump distance’ required for the
head to dislocate in an appropriately positioned cup. Level-one
studies support the use of larger diameter heads as they decrease
the risk of dislocation following primary and revision THR. Highly cross-linked
polyethylene has allowed us to increase femoral head size, without
a marked increase in wear. However, the thin polyethylene liners
necessary to accommodate larger heads may increase the risk of liner
fracture and larger heads have also been implicated in causing soft-tissue
impingement resulting in groin pain. Larger diameter heads also
impart larger forces on the femoral trunnion, which may contribute
to corrosion, metal release, and adverse local tissue reactions.
Alternative large bearings including large ceramic heads and dual
mobility bearings may mitigate some of these risks, and several
of these devices have been used with clinical success. Cite this article:
Two-stage exchange remains the gold standard
for treatment of peri-prosthetic joint infection after total hip replacement
(THR). In the first stage, all components and associated cement
if present are removed, an aggressive debridement is undertaken
including a complete synovectomy, and an antibiotic-loaded cement
spacer is put in place. Patients are then treated with six weeks
of parenteral antibiotics, followed by an ‘antibiotic free period’
to help ensure the infection has been eradicated. If the clinical
evaluation and serum inflammatory markers suggest the infection
has resolved, then the second stage can be completed, which involves
removal of the cement spacer, repeat debridement, and placement
of a new THR. Cite this article:
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the risk
factors, prevention strategies, classification, and treatment of
intra-operative femur fractures sustained during primary and revision
total hip arthroplasty.
A moderator and panel of five experts led an
interactive session in discussing five challenging and interesting patient
case presentations involving surgery of the hip. The hip pathologies
reviewed included failed open reduction internal fixation of subcapital
femoral neck fracture, bilateral hip disease, evaluation of pain
after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty, avascular necrosis, aseptic
loosening secondary to osteolysis and polyethylene wear, and management
of ceramic femoral head fracture.
This conversation represents an attempt by several
arthroplasty surgeons to critique several abstracts presented over
the last year as well as to use them as a jumping off point for trying
to figure out where they fit in into our current understanding of
multiple issues in modern hip and knee arthroplasty.
