Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of a protocol involving
a standardised closed reduction for the treatment of children with
developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in maintaining reduction
and to report the mid-term results. A total of 133 hips in 120 children aged less than two years
who underwent closed reduction, with a minimum follow-up of five
years or until subsequent surgery, were included in the study. The
protocol defines the criteria for an acceptable reduction and the
indications for a concomitant soft-tissue release. All children
were immobilised in a short- leg cast for three months. Arthrograms
were undertaken at the time of closed reduction and six weeks later. Follow-up
radiographs were taken at six months and one, two and five years
later and at the latest follow-up. The Tönnis grade, acetabular
index, Severin grade and signs of osteonecrosis were recorded.Aims
Methods
The medial approach for the treatment of children
with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in whom closed reduction
has failed requires minimal access with negligible blood loss. In
the United Kingdom, there is a preference for these children to
be treated using an anterolateral approach after the appearance
of the ossific nucleus. In this study we compared these two protocols,
primarily for the risk of osteonecrosis. Data were gathered prospectively for protocols involving the
medial approach (26 hips in 22 children) and the anterolateral approach
(22 hips in 21 children) in children aged <
24 months at the
time of surgery. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was assessed
with validated scores. The acetabular index (AI) and centre–edge
angle (CEA) were also measured. The mean age of the children at the time of surgery was 11 months
(3 to 24) for the medial approach group and 18 months (12 to 24)
for the anterolateral group, and the combined mean follow-up was
70 months (26 to 228). Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was evident
or asphericity predicted in three of 26 hips (12%) in the medial approach
group and four of 22 (18%) in the anterolateral group (p = 0.52).
The mean improvement in AI was 8.8° (4° to 12°) and 7.9° (6° to
10°), respectively, at two years post-operatively (p = 0.18). There
was no significant difference in CEA values of affected hips between
the two groups. Children treated using an early medial approach did not have
a higher risk of developing osteonecrosis at early to mid-term follow-up
than those treated using a delayed anterolateral approach. The rates
of acetabular remodelling were similar for both protocols. Cite this article:
