Accurate placement of the acetabular component is essential in
total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to determine
if the ability to achieve inclination of the acetabular component
within the ‘safe-zone’ of 30° to 50° could be improved with the
use of an inclinometer. We reviewed 167 primary THAs performed by a single surgeon over
a period of 14 months. Procedures were performed at two institutions:
an inpatient hospital, where an inclinometer was used (inclinometer
group); and an ambulatory centre, where an inclinometer was not
used as it could not be adequately sterilized (control group). We excluded
47 patients with a body mass index (BMI) of > 40 kg/m2,
age of > 68 years, or a surgical indication other than osteoarthritis
whose treatment could not be undertaken in the ambulatory centre.
There were thus 120 patients in the study, 68 in the inclinometer
group and 52 in the control group. The inclination angles of the acetabular
component were measured from de-identified plain radiographs by
two blinded investigators who were not involved in the surgery.
The effect of the use of the inclinometer on the inclination angle
was determined using multivariate regression analysis.Aims
Patients and Methods
This study aimed to evaluate implant survival of reverse hybrid
total hip arthroplasty (THA) at medium-term follow-up. A consecutive series of 1082 THAs in 982 patients with mean follow-up
of 7.9 years (5 to 11.3) is presented. Mean age was 69.2 years (21
to 94). Of these, 194 (17.9%) were in patients under 60 years, 663
(61.3%) in female patients and 348 (32.2%) performed by a trainee.
Head size was 28 mm in 953 hips (88.1%) or 32 mm in 129 hips (11.9%).
Survival analysis was performed and subgroups compared using log
rank tests.Aims
Patients and Methods
A high radiographic inclination angle (RI) contributes
to accelerated wear and has been associated with dislocation after
total hip arthroplasty (THA). With freehand positioning of the acetabular
component there is a lack of accuracy, with a trend towards a high
radiographic inclination angle. The aim of this study was to investigate
whether the use of a digital protractor to measure the operative
inclination angle (OI) could improve the positioning of the acetabular
component in relation to a ‘safe zone’. We measured the radiographic inclination angles of 200 consecutive
uncemented primary THAs. In the first 100 the component was introduced
freehand and in the second 100 a digital protractor was used to
measure the operative inclination angle. The mean difference between the operative and the radiographic
inclination angles
(∆RI–OI) in the second cohort was 12.3° (3.8° to 19.8°). There was
a strong correlation between the circumference of the hip and ∆RI–OI.
The number of RI outliers was significantly reduced in the protractor
group (p = 0.002). Adjusting the OI, using a digital protractor and taking into
account the circumference of the patient’s hip, improves the RI
significantly (p <
0.001) and does not require additional operating
time. Cite this article:
Orientation of the acetabular component influences
wear, range of movement and the incidence of dislocation after total
hip replacement (THR). During surgery, such orientation is often
referenced to the anterior pelvic plane (APP), but APP inclination
relative to the coronal plane (pelvic tilt) varies substantially
between individuals. In contrast, the change in pelvic tilt from
supine to standing (dPT) is small for nearly all individuals. Therefore,
in THR performed with the patient supine and the patient’s coronal
plane parallel to the operating table, we propose that freehand placement
of the acetabular component placement is reliable and reflects standing
(functional) cup position. We examined this hypothesis in 56 hips
in 56 patients (19 men) with a mean age of 61 years (29 to 80) using
three-dimensional CT pelvic reconstructions and standing lateral
pelvic radiographs. We found a low variability of acetabular component
placement, with 46 implants (82%) placed within a combined range
of 30° to 50° inclination and 5° to 25° anteversion. Changing from
the supine to the standing position (analysed in 47 patients) was associated
with an anteversion change <
10° in 45 patients (96%). dPT was
<
10° in 41 patients (87%). In conclusion, supine THR appears
to provide reliable freehand acetabular component placement. In
most patients a small reclination of the pelvis going from supine
to standing causes a small increase in anteversion of the acetabular component Cite this article:
In a prospective randomised clinical study acetabular components were implanted either freehand (n = 30) or using CT-based (n = 30) or imageless navigation (n = 30). The position of the component was determined post-operatively on CT scans of the pelvis. Following conventional freehand placement of the acetabular component, only 14 of the 30 were within the safe zone as defined by Lewinnek et al (40° inclination Imageless navigation proved as reliable as that using CT in positioning the acetabular component.
Orientation of the native acetabular plane as defined by the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) and the posterior labrum was measured intra-operatively using computer-assisted navigation in 39 hips. In order to assess the influence of alignment on impingement, the range of movement was calculated for that defined by the TAL and the posterior labrum and compared with a standard acetabular component position (abduction 45°/anteversion 15°). With respect to the registration of the plane defined by the TAL and the posterior labrum, there was moderate interobserver agreement (r = 0.64, p <
0.001) and intra-observer reproducibility (r = 0.73, p <
0.001). The mean acetabular component orientation achieved was abduction of 41° (32° to 51°) and anteversion of 18° (−1° to 36°). With respect to the Lewinnek safe zone (abduction 40° ±10°, anteversion 15° ±10°), 35 of the 39 acetabular components were within this zone. However, there was no improvement in the range of movement (p = 0.94) and no significant difference in impingement (p = 0.085). Alignment of the acetabular component with the TAL and the posterior labrum might reduce the variability of acetabular component placement in total hip replacement. However, there is only a moderate interobserver agreement and intra-observer reliability in the alignment of the acetabular component using the TAL and the posterior labrum. No reduction in impingement was found when the acetabular component was aligned with the TAL and the posterior labrum, compared with a standard acetabular component position.
Pseudotumours are a rare complication of hip resurfacing. They are thought to be a response to metal debris which may be caused by edge loading due to poor orientation of the acetabular component. Our aim was to determine the optimal acetabular orientation to minimise the risk of pseudotumour formation. We matched 31 hip resurfacings revised for pseudotumour formation with 58 controls who had a satisfactory outcome from this procedure. The radiographic inclination and anteversion angles of the acetabular component were measured on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis using Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse software. The mean inclination angle (47°, 10° to 81°) and anteversion angle (14°, 4° to 34°) of the pseudotumour cases were the same (p = 0.8, p = 0.2) as the controls, 46° (29° to 60°) and 16° (4° to 30°) respectively, but the variation was greater. Assuming an accuracy of implantation of ± 10° about a target position, the optimal radiographic position was found to be approximately 45° of inclination and 20° of anteversion. The incidence of pseudotumours inside the zone was four times lower (p = 0.007) than outside the zone. In order to minimise the risk of pseudotumour formation we recommend that surgeons implant the acetabular component at an inclination of 45° (± 10) and anteversion of 20° (± 10) on post-operative radiographs. Because of differences between the radiographic and the operative angles, this may be best achieved by aiming for an inclination of 40° and an anteversion of 25°.
