In patients with a failed radial head arthroplasty (RHA), simple removal of the implant is an option. However, there is little information in the literature about the outcome of this procedure. The aim of this study was to review the mid-term clinical and radiological results, and the rate of complications and removal of the implant, in patients whose initial RHA was undertaken acutely for trauma involving the elbow. A total of 11 patients in whom removal of a RHA without reimplantation was undertaken as a revision procedure were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 8.4 years (6 to 11). The range of motion (ROM) and stability of the elbow were recorded. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The functional outcome was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH). Radiological examination included the assessment of heterotopic ossification (HO), implant loosening, capitellar erosion, overlengthening, and osteoarthritis. Complications and the rate of further surgery were also recorded.Aims
Methods
The aim of this retrospective multicentre study was to evaluate
mid-term results of the operative treatment of Monteggia-like lesions
and to determine the prognostic factors that influence the clinical
and radiological outcome. A total of 46 patients (27 women and 19 men), with a mean age
of 57.7 years (18 to 84) who had sustained a Monteggia-like lesion
were followed up clinically and radiologically after surgical treatment.
The Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), Mayo Elbow Performance Score
(MEPS), Broberg and Morrey Score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder
and Hand (DASH) score were used for evaluation at a mean of 65 months
(27 to 111) postoperatively. All ulnar fractures were stabilized
using a proximally contoured or precontoured locking compression
plate. Mason type I fractures of the radial head were treated conservatively, type
II fractures were treated with reconstruction, and type III fractures
with arthroplasty. All Morrey type II and III fractures of the coronoid
process was stabilized using lag screws.Aims
Patients and Methods
Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) may be used in the treatment of
non-reconstructable radial head fractures. The aim of this study
was to evaluate the mid-term clinical and radiographic results of
RHA. Between 2002 and 2014, 77 RHAs were implanted in 54 men and 23
women with either acute injuries (54) or with traumatic sequelae
(23) of a fracture of the radial head. Four designs of RHA were
used, including the Guepar (Small Bone Innovations (SBi)/Stryker;
36), Evolutive (Aston Medical; 24), rHead RECON (SBi/Stryker; ten)
or rHead STANDARD (SBi/Stryker; 7) prostheses. The mean follow-up
was 74.0 months (standard deviation (Aims
Patients and Methods
Revision total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is often challenging.
The aim of this study was to report on the clinical and radiological
results of revision arthroplasty of the elbow with the Latitude
TEA. Between 2006 and 2010 we used the Latitude TEA for revision in
18 consecutive elbows (17 patients); mean age 53 years (28 to 80);
14 women. A Kudo TEA was revised in 15 elbows and a Souter-Strathclyde
TEA in three. Stability, range of movement (ROM), visual analogue score (VAS)
for pain and functional scores, Elbow Functional Assessment Scale
(EFAS), the Functional Rating Index of Broberg and Morrey (FRIBM)
and the Modified Andrews’ Elbow Scoring System (MAESS) were assessed
pre-operatively and at each post-operative follow-up visit (six,
12 months and biennially thereafter). Radiographs were analysed
for loosening, fractures and dislocation. The mean follow-up was
59 months (26 to 89).Aims
Patients and Methods
Determining and accurately restoring the flexion-extension
axis of the elbow is essential for functional recovery after total
elbow arthroplasty (TEA). We evaluated the effect of morphological
features of the elbow on variations of alignment of the components
at TEA. Morphological and positioning variables were compared by
systematic CT scans of 22 elbows in 21 patients after TEA. There were five men and 16 women, and the mean age was 63 years
(38 to 80). The mean follow-up was 22 months (11 to 44). The anterior offset and version of the humeral components were
significantly affected by the anterior angulation of the humerus
(p = 0.052 and p = 0.004, respectively). The anterior offset and
version of the ulnar components were strongly significantly affected
by the anterior angulation of the ulna (p <
0.001 and p <
0.001). The closer the anterior angulation of the ulna was to the joint,
the lower the ulnar anterior offset (p = 0.030) and version of the
ulnar component (p = 0.010). The distance from the joint to the
varus angulation also affected the lateral offset of the ulnar component
(p = 0.046). Anatomical variations at the distal humerus and proximal ulna
affect the alignment of the components at TEA. This is explained
by abutment of the stems of the components and is particularly severe
when there are substantial deformities or the deformities are close
to the joint. Cite this article:
