We report the results of revision total knee
replacement (TKR) in 26 patients with major metaphyseal osteolytic defects
using 29 trabecular metal cones in conjunction with a rotating hinged
total knee prosthesis. The osteolytic defects were types II and
III (A or B) according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
(AORI) classification. The mean age of the patients was 72 years
(62 to 84) and there were 15 men and 11 women. In this series patients had
undergone a mean of 2.34 previous total knee arthroplasties. The
main objective was to restore anatomy along with stability and function
of the knee joint to allow immediate full weight-bearing and active
knee movement. Outcomes were measured using Knee Society scores,
Oxford knee scores, range of movement of the knee and serial radiographs.
Patients were followed for a mean of 36 months (24 to 49). The mean
Oxford knee clinical scores improved from 12.83 (10 to 15) to 35.20
(32 to 38) (p <
0.001) and mean American Knee Society scores
improved from 33.24 (13 to 36) to 81.12 (78 to 86) (p <
0.001).
No radiolucent lines suggestive of loosening were seen around the trabecular
metal cones, and by one year all the radiographs showed good osteo-integration.
There was no evidence of any collapse or implant migration. Our
early results confirm the findings of others that trabecular metal
cones offer a useful way of managing severe bone loss in revision
TKR. Cite this article:
Porous metaphyseal cones can be used for fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and complex TKAs. This metaphyseal fixation has led to some surgeons using shorter cemented stems instead of diaphyseal engaging cementless stems with a potential benefit of ease of obtaining proper alignment without being beholden to the diaphysis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate short term clinical and radiographic outcomes of a series of TKA cases performed using 3D-printed metaphyseal cones. A retrospective review of 86 rTKAs and nine complex primary TKAs, with an average age of 63.2 years (SD 8.2) and BMI of 34.0 kg/m2 (SD 8.7), in which metaphyseal cones were used for both femoral and tibial fixation were compared for their knee alignment based on the type of stem used. Overall, 22 knees had cementless stems on both sides, 52 had cemented stems on both sides, and 15 had mixed stems. Postoperative long-standing radiographs were evaluated for coronal and sagittal plane alignment. Adjusted logistic regression models were run to assess malalignment hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment beyond ± 3° and sagittal alignment of the tibial and femoral components ± 3° by stem type.Aims
Methods
Metaphyseal fixation during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important, but potentially difficult when using historical designs of cone. Material and manufacturing innovations have improved the size and shape of the cones which are available, and simplified the required bone preparation. In a large series, we assessed the implant survivorship, radiological results, and clinical outcomes of new porous 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones featuring a reamer-based system. We reviewed 142 revision TKAs in 139 patients using 202 cones (134 tibial, 68 femoral) which were undertaken between 2015 and 2016. A total of 60 involved tibial and femoral cones. Most cones (149 of 202; 74%) were used for Type 2B or 3 bone loss. The mean age of the patients was 66 years (44 to 88), and 76 (55 %) were female. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 34 kg/m2 (18 to 60). The patients had a mean of 2.4 (1 to 8) previous operations on the knee, and 68 (48%) had a history of prosthetic infection. The mean follow-up was 2.4 years (2 to 3.6).Aims
Methods
Local recurrence remains a challenging and common problem following curettage and joint-sparing surgery for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). We previously reported a 15% local recurrence rate at a median follow-up of 30 months in 20 patients with high-risk GCTB treated with neoadjuvant Denosumab. The aim of this study was to determine if this initial favourable outcome following the use of Denosumab was maintained with longer follow-up. Patients with GCTB of the limb considered high-risk for unsuccessful joint salvage, due to minimal periarticular and subchondral bone, large soft tissue mass, or pathological fracture, were treated with Denosumab followed by extended intralesional curettage with the goal of preserving the joint surface. Patients were followed for local recurrence, metastasis, and secondary sarcoma.Aims
Methods
Tibial cones are often utilized in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with metaphyseal defects. Because there are few studies evaluating mid-term outcomes with a sufficient cohort, the purpose of this study was to evaluate tibial cone survival and complications in revision TKAs with tibial cones at minimum follow-up of five years. A retrospective review was completed from September 2006 to March 2015, evaluating 67 revision TKAs (64 patients) that received one specific porous tibial cone during revision TKA. The final cohort was composed of 62 knees (59 patients) with five years of clinical follow-up or reoperation. The mean clinical follow-up of the TKAs with minimum five-year clinical follow-up was 7.6 years (5.0 to 13.3). Survivorship analysis was performed with the endpoints of tibial cone revision for aseptic loosening, tibial cone revision for any reason, and reoperation. We also evaluated periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), risk factors for failure, and performed a radiological review.Aims
Methods
The treatment of bone loss in revision total
knee arthroplasty has evolved over the past decade. While the management
of small to moderate sized defects has demonstrated good results
with a variety of traditional techniques (cement and screws, small
metal augments, impaction bone grafting or modular stems), the treatment of
severe defects continues to be problematic. The use of a structural
allograft has declined in recent years due to an increased failure
rate with long-term follow-up and with the introduction of highly
porous metal augments that emphasise biological metaphyseal fixation.
Recently published mid-term results on the use of tantalum cones
in patients with severe bone loss has reaffirmed the success of
this treatment strategy. Cite this article:
Metaphyseal cones with cemented stems are frequently used in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, if the diaphysis has been previously violated, the resultant sclerotic canal can impair cemented stem fixation, which is vital for bone ingrowth into the cone, and long-term fixation. We report the outcomes of our solution to this problem, in which impaction grafting and a cemented stem in the diaphysis is combined with an uncemented metaphyseal cone, for revision TKA in patients with severely compromised bone. A metaphyseal cone was combined with diaphyseal impaction grafting and cemented stems for 35 revision TKAs. There were two patients with follow-up of less than two years who were excluded, leaving 33 procedures in 32 patients in the study. The mean age of the patients at the time of revision TKA was 67 years (32 to 87); 20 (60%) were male. Patients had undergone a mean of four (1 to 13) previous knee arthroplasty procedures. The indications for revision were aseptic loosening (80%) and two-stage reimplantation for prosthetic joint infection (PJI; 20%). The mean follow-up was four years (2 to 11).Aims
Methods
Metaphyseal tritanium cones can be used to manage the tibial bone loss commonly encountered at revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Tibial stems provide additional fixation and are generally used in combination with cones. The aim of this study was to examine the role of the stems in the overall stability of tibial implants when metaphyseal cones are used for rTKA. This computational study investigates whether stems are required to augment metaphyseal cones at rTKA. Three cemented stem scenarios (no stem, 50 mm stem, and 100 mm stem) were investigated with 10 mm-deep uncontained posterior and medial tibial defects using four loading scenarios designed to mimic activities of daily living.Aims
Methods
The December 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Albumin and complications in knee arthroplasty; Tantalum: a knee fixation for all seasons?; Dynamic knee alignment; Tibial component design in UKA; Managing the tidal wave of revision knee arthroplasty; Scoring pain in TKR; Does anyone have a ‘normal’ tibial slope?; XLPE in TKR? A five-year clinical study; Spacers and infected revision arthroplasties; Dialysis and arthroplasty
The April 2014 Knee Roundup360 looks at: mobile compression as good as chemical thromboprophylaxis; patellar injury with MIS knee surgery; tibial plateau fracture results not as good as we thought; back and knee pain; metaphyseal sleeves may be the answer in revision knee replacement; oral tranexamic acid; gentamycin alone in antibiotic spacers; and whether the jury is still out on unloader braces.
Bone loss in the proximal tibia and distal femur
is frequently encountered in revision knee replacement surgery.
The various options for dealing with this depend on the extent of
any bone loss. We present our results with the use of cementless
metaphyseal metal sleeves in 103 patients (104 knees) with a mean
follow-up of 43 months (30 to 65). At final follow-up, sleeves in
102 knees had good osseointegration. Two tibial sleeves were revised
for loosening, possibly due to infection. The average pre-operative Oxford Knee Score was 23 (11 to 36)
and this improved to 32 (15 to 46) post-operatively. These early
results encourage us to continue with the technique and monitor
the outcomes in the long term. Cite this article:
Metaphyseal bone loss is common with revision
total knee replacement (RTKR). Using the Anderson Orthopaedic Research
Institute (AORI) classification, type 2-B and type 3 defects usually
require large metal blocks, bulk structural allograft or highly
porous metal cones. Tibial and femoral trabecular metal metaphyseal
cones are a unique solution for large bone defects. These cones
substitute for bone loss, improve metaphyseal fixation, help correct
malalignment, restore the joint line and may permit use of a shorter
stem. The technique for insertion involves sculpturing of the remaining
bone with a high speed burr and rasp, followed by press-fit of the
cone into the metaphysis. The fixation and osteoconductive properties
of the porous cone outer surface allow ingrowth and encourage long-term
biological fixation. The revision knee component is then cemented
into the porous cone inner surface, which provides superior fixation
compared with cementing into native but deficient metaphyseal bone.
The advantages of the cone compared with allograft include: technical
ease, biological fixation, no resorption, and possibly a lower risk
of infection. The disadvantages include: difficult extraction and
relatively short-term follow-up. Several studies using cones report
promising short-term results for the reconstruction of large bone
defects in RTKR. Cite this article:
