The timing of surgical fixation in spinal fractures is a contentious topic. Existing literature suggests that early stabilization leads to reduced morbidity, improved neurological outcomes, and shorter hospital stay. However, the quality of evidence is low and equivocal with regard to the safety of early fixation in the severely injured patient. This paper compares complication profiles between spinal fractures treated with early fixation and those treated with late fixation. All patients transferred to a national tertiary spinal referral centre for primary surgical fixation of unstable spinal injuries without preoperative neurological deficit between 1 July 2016 and 20 October 2017 were eligible for inclusion. Data were collected retrospectively. Patients were divided into early and late cohorts based on timing from initial trauma to first spinal operation. Early fixation was defined as within 72 hours, and late fixation beyond 72 hours.Aims
Methods
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF)
has been well validated in overweight and obese patients who are
consequently subject to a higher radiation exposure. This prospective
multicentre study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a novel lumbar
localisation system for MITLIF in overweight patients. The initial study group consisted of 175 patients. After excluding
49 patients for various reasons, 126 patients were divided into
two groups. Those in Group A were treated using the localisation
system while those in Group B were treated by conventional means.
The primary outcomes were the effective radiation dosage to the
surgeon and the exposure time.Aims
Patients and Methods
Pedicle-lengthening osteotomy is a novel surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), which achieves substantial enlargement of the spinal canal by expansion of the bilateral pedicle osteotomy sites. Few studies have evaluated the impact of this new surgery on spinal canal volume (SCV) and neural foramen dimension (NFD) in three different types of LSS patients. CT scans were performed on 36 LSS patients (12 central canal stenosis (CCS), 12 lateral recess stenosis (LRS), and 12 foraminal stenosis (FS)) at L4-L5, and on 12 normal (control) subjects. Mimics 14.01 workstation was used to reconstruct 3D models of the L4-L5 vertebrae and discs. SCV and NFD were measured after 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm, or 5 mm pedicle-lengthening osteotomies at L4 and/or L5. One-way analysis of variance was used to examine between-group differences.Objectives
Methods
In a retrospective cohort study we compared the
clinical outcome and complications, including dysphagia, following
anterior cervical fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylosis
using either a zero-profile (Zero-P; Synthes) implant or an anterior
cervical plate and cage. A total of 83 patients underwent fusion
using a Zero-P and 107 patients underwent fusion using a plate and
cage. The mean follow-up was 18.6 months ( When compared with the traditional anterior cervical plate and
cage, the Zero-P implant is a safe and convenient procedure giving
good results in patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis with
a reduced incidence of dysphagia post-operatively. Cite this article:
