Multimodal infiltration of local anaesthetic provides effective
control of pain in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
There is little information about the added benefits of posterior
capsular infiltration (PCI) using different combinations of local
anaesthetic agents. Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness
of the control of pain using multimodal infiltration with and without
infiltration of the posterior capsule of the knee. In a double-blind, randomised controlled trial of patients scheduled
for unilateral primary TKA, 86 were assigned to be treated with
multimodal infiltration with (Group I) or without (Group II) PCI.
Routine associated analgesia included the use of bupivacaine, morphine,
ketorolac and epinephrine. All patients had spinal anaesthesia and patient-controlled
analgesia (PCA) post-operatively. A visual analogue scale (VAS)
for pain and the use of morphine were recorded 24 hours post-operatively.
Side effects of the infiltration, blood loss, and length of stay
in hospital were recorded.Aims
Patients and Methods
Early and accurate prediction of hospital length-of-stay
(LOS) in patients undergoing knee replacement is important for economic
and operational reasons. Few studies have systematically developed
a multivariable model to predict LOS. We performed a retrospective
cohort study of 1609 patients aged ≥ 50 years who underwent elective,
primary total or unicompartmental knee replacements. Pre-operative
candidate predictors included patient demographics, knee function,
self-reported measures, surgical factors and discharge plans. In
order to develop the model, multivariable regression with bootstrap
internal validation was used. The median LOS for the sample was
four days (interquartile range 4 to 5). Statistically significant
predictors of longer stay included older age, greater number of comorbidities,
less knee flexion range of movement, frequent feelings of being
down and depressed, greater walking aid support required, total
( Cite this article:
We have performed a prospective double-blind, randomised controlled trial over two years to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intra-operative peri-articular injection of triamcinolone acetonide in patients undergoing medial unicondylar knee replacement. We randomised 90 patients into two equal groups. The study group received an injection of triamcinolone acetonide, bupivacaine, and epinephrine into the peri-articular tissues at the end of the operation. The control group received the same injection mixture but without the addition of triamcinolone. The peri-operative analgesic regimen was standardised. The study group reported a significant reduction in pain (p = 0.014 at 12 hours, p = 0.031 at 18 hours and p = 0.031 at 24 hours) and had a better range of movement (p = 0.023 at three months). There was no significant difference in the rate of infection and no incidence of tendon rupture in either group. The addition of corticosteroid to the peri-articular injection after unicondylar knee replacement had both immediate and short-term benefits in terms of relief from pain, and rehabilitation with no increased risk of infection.
