Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 30 of 30
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 3 | Pages 224 - 226
1 Mar 2024
Ferguson D Perry DC


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 1 | Pages 6 - 8
1 Jan 2024
Stevenson J Cool P Ashford R

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(1):6–8.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 9 | Pages 879 - 883
1 Sep 2024
Kayani B Staats K Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 8 | Pages 909 - 910
1 Aug 2022
Vigdorchik JM Jang SJ Taunton MJ Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 6 | Pages 409 - 412
22 Jun 2022
Tsang SJ Ferreira N Simpson AHRW


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 10, Issue 9 | Pages 571 - 573
2 Sep 2021
Beverly MC Murray DW


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 4
1 Jan 2021
Parker M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 5 | Pages 547 - 549
1 May 2020
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 9, Issue 6 | Pages 279 - 281
1 Jun 2020
Clement ND Deehan DJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 6 | Pages 655 - 657
1 Jun 2020
Minhas Z Ganau M Thakar C Reynolds J Rothenfluh D Bojanic S Grannum S Chaudhary BR Pyrovolou N Sikander M Bowden G Patel UJ Nnadi C


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1466 - 1468
1 Dec 2019
Ramasamy A Humphrey J Robinson AHN


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 4 | Pages 403 - 406
1 Apr 2020
Trompeter A


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 2 | Pages 145 - 147
1 Feb 2020
Ollivere B Metcalfe D Perry DC Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1321 - 1324
1 Nov 2019
Kerr S Warwick D Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 2 | Pages 121 - 123
1 Feb 2019
Robinson AHN Johnson-Lynn SE Humphrey JA Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 5 | Pages 325 - 326
1 May 2018
Clement ND Deehan DJ


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 1 | Pages 103 - 104
1 Jan 2018
Young PS Patil S Meek RMD


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 3 | Pages 223 - 225
1 Mar 2018
Jones LD Golan D Hanna SA Ramachandran M


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 6 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Dec 2017
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1555 - 1556
1 Dec 2017
Amin AK Simpson AHRW Hall AC



The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 6 | Pages 721 - 722
1 Jun 2015
Haddad FS Waddell J


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 7 | Pages 871 - 874
1 Jul 2015
Breakwell LM Cole AA Birch N Heywood C

The effective capture of outcome measures in the healthcare setting can be traced back to Florence Nightingale’s investigation of the in-patient mortality of soldiers wounded in the Crimean war in the 1850s.

Only relatively recently has the formalised collection of outcomes data into Registries been recognised as valuable in itself.

With the advent of surgeon league tables and a move towards value based health care, individuals are being driven to collect, store and interpret data.

Following the success of the National Joint Registry, the British Association of Spine Surgeons instituted the British Spine Registry. Since its launch in 2012, over 650 users representing the whole surgical team have registered and during this time, more than 27 000 patients have been entered onto the database.

There has been significant publicity regarding the collection of outcome measures after surgery, including patient-reported scores. Over 12 000 forms have been directly entered by patients themselves, with many more entered by the surgical teams.

Questions abound: who should have access to the data produced by the Registry and how should they use it? How should the results be reported and in what forum?

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:871–4.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1575 - 1577
1 Dec 2014
Perry DC Parsons N Costa ML

The extent and depth of routine health care data are growing at an ever-increasing rate, forming huge repositories of information. These repositories can answer a vast array of questions. However, an understanding of the purpose of the dataset used and the quality of the data collected are paramount to determine the reliability of the result obtained.

This Editorial describes the importance of adherence to sound methodological principles in the reporting and publication of research using ‘big’ data, with a suggested reporting framework for future Bone & Joint Journal submissions.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1575–7.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 5 | Pages 565 - 566
1 May 2014
Limb D

Continuing professional development (CPD) refers to the ongoing participation in activities that keep a doctor up to date and fit to practise once they have completed formal training. It is something that most will do naturally to serve their patients and to enable them to run a safe and profitable practice. Increasingly, regulators are formalising the requirements for evidence of CPD, often as part of a process of revalidation or relicensing.

This paper reviews how orthopaedic journals can be used as part of the process of continuing professional development.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:565–6.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 4
1 Jan 2014
Barrack RL


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1153 - 1155
1 Sep 2013
Timperley AJ Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 3 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Jun 2013
Ollivere BJ


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 2 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Apr 2013
Ollivere BJ


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1593 - 1594
1 Dec 2005
Carr AJ