Patients undergoing femoral lengthening by external fixation
tolerate treatment less well when compared to tibial lengthening.
Lengthening of the femur with an intramedullary device may have
advantages. We reviewed all cases of simple femoral lengthening performed
at our unit from 2009 to 2014. Cases of nonunions, concurrent deformities,
congenital limb deficiencies and lengthening with an unstable hip
were excluded, leaving 33 cases (in 22 patients; 11 patients had
bilateral procedures) for review. Healing index, implant tolerance
and complications were compared.Aims
Patients and Methods
We compared lower limb coronal alignment measurements
obtained pre- and post-operatively with long-leg radiographs and
computer navigation in patients undergoing primary total knee replacement
(TKR). A series of 185 patients had their pre- and post-implant
radiological and computer-navigation system measurements of coronal alignment
compared using the Bland-Altman method. The study included 81 men
and 104 women with a mean age of 68.5 years (32 to 87) and a mean
body mass index of 31.7 kg/m2 (19 to 49). Pre-implant
Bland–Altman limits of agreement were -9.4° to 8.6° with a repeatability
coefficient of 9.0°. The Bland–Altman plot showed a tendency for the
radiological measurement to indicate a higher level of pre-operative
deformity than the corresponding navigation measurement. Post-implant
limits of agreement were -5.0° to 5.4° with a repeatability coefficient
of 5.2°. The tendency for valgus knees to have greater deformity
on the radiograph was still seen, but was weaker for varus knees. The alignment seen or measured intra-operatively during TKR is
not necessarily the same as the deformity seen on a standing long-leg
radiograph either pre- or post-operatively. Further investigation
into the effect of weight-bearing and surgical exposure of the joint
on the mechanical femorotibial angle is required to enable the most appropriate
intra-operative alignment to be selected.
