This study describes the Osseointegration Group of Australia’s
Accelerated Protocol two-stage strategy (OGAAP-1) for the osseointegrated
reconstruction of amputated limbs. We report clinical outcomes in 50 unilateral trans-femoral amputees
with a mean age of 49.4 years (24 to 73), with a minimum one-year
follow-up. Outcome measures included the Questionnaire for persons
with a Trans-Femoral Amputation, the health assessment questionnaire
Short-Form-36 Health Survey, the Amputation Mobility Predictor scores
presented as K-levels, 6 Minute Walk Test and timed up and go tests.
Adverse events included soft-tissue problems, infection, fractures
and failure of the implant.Aims
Patients and Methods
Although patients with a history of venous thromboembolism
(VTE) who undergo lower limb joint replacement are thought to be
at high risk of further VTE, the actual rate of recurrence has not
been reported. The purpose of this study was to identify the recurrence rate
of VTE in patients who had undergone lower limb joint replacement,
and to compare it with that of patients who had undergone a joint
replacement without a history of VTE. From a pool of 6646 arthroplasty procedures (3344 TKR, 2907 THR,
243 revision THR, 152 revision TKR) in 5967 patients (68% female,
mean age 67.7; 21 to 96) carried out between 2009 and 2011, we retrospectively
identified 118 consecutive treatment episodes in 106 patients (65%
female, mean age 70; 51 to 88,) who had suffered a previous VTE.
Despite mechanical prophylaxis and anticoagulation with warfarin,
we had four recurrences by three months (3.4% of 118) and six by
one year (5.1% of 118). In comparison, in all our other joint replacements
the rate of VTE was 0.54% (35/6528). The relative risk of a VTE by 90 days in patients who had undergone
a joint replacement with a history of VTE compared with those with
a joint replacement and no history of VTE was 6.3 (95% confidence
interval, 2.3 to 17.5). There were five complications in the previous
VTE group related to bleeding or over-anticoagulation. Cite this article:
The intra-articular injection of local anaesthetic is frequently used for pain relief after arthroscopy. There is, however, no published evidence of the analgesic effect of bupivacaine in the ankle. In a randomised, double-blind study, 35 patients undergoing arthroscopy of the ankle were allocated to receive intra-articular saline or bupivacaine. Pain was assessed using pain scores and additional analgesic requirements. Intra-articular bupivacaine had a significant analgesic effect in the immediate post-operative period, reducing pain scores and the need for additional analgesics. We recommend the use of intra-articular bupivacaine for post-operative analgesia in ankle surgery.
