The traditional transosseus flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon
transfer for patients with Achilles tendinopathy requires two incisions
to harvest a long tendon graft. The use of a bio-tenodesis screw
enables a short graft to be used and is less invasive, but lacks
supporting evidence about its biomechanical behaviour. We aimed,
in this study, to compare the strength of the traditional transosseus
tendon-to-tendon fixation with tendon-to-bone fixation using a tenodesis
screw, in cyclical loading and ultimate load testing. Tendon grafts were undertaken in 24 paired lower-leg specimens
and randomly assigned in two groups using fixation with a transosseus
suture (suture group) or a tenodesis screw (screw group). The biomechanical
behaviour was evaluated using cyclical and ultimate loading tests.
The Student’s Aims
Materials and Methods
Resection of a primary sarcoma of the diaphysis
of a long bone creates a large defect. The biological options for reconstruction
include the use of a vascularised and non-vascularised fibular autograft. The purpose of the present study was to compare these methods
of reconstruction. Between 1985 and 2007, 53 patients (26 male and 27 female) underwent
biological reconstruction of a diaphyseal defect after resection
of a primary sarcoma. Their mean age was 20.7 years (3.6 to 62.4).
Of these, 26 (49 %) had a vascularised and 27 (51 %) a non-vascularised
fibular autograft. Either method could have been used for any patient in
the study. The mean follow-up was 52 months (12 to 259). Oncological,
surgical and functional outcome were evaluated. Kaplan–Meier analysis
was performed for graft survival with major complication as the
end point. At final follow-up, eight patients had died of disease. Primary
union was achieved in 40 patients (75%); 22 (42%) with a vascularised
fibular autograft and 18 (34%) a non-vascularised (p = 0.167). A
total of 32 patients (60%) required revision surgery. Kaplan–Meier
analysis revealed a mean survival without complication of 36 months
(0.06 to 107.3, Both groups seem to be reliable biological methods of reconstructing
a diaphyseal bone defect. Vascularised autografts require more revisions
mainly due to problems with wound healing in distal sites of tumour,
such as the foot. Cite this article:
