The outcomes of 261 nerve injuries in 100 patients
were graded good in 173 cases (66%), fair in 70 (26.8%) and poor in
18 (6.9%) at the final review (median 28.4 months (1.3 to 64.2)).
The initial grades for the 42 sutures and graft were 11 good, 14
fair and 17 poor. After subsequent revision repairs in seven, neurolyses
in 11 and free vascularised fasciocutaneous flaps in 11, the final
grades were 15 good, 18 fair and nine poor. Pain was relieved in
30 of 36 patients by nerve repair, revision of repair or neurolysis,
and flaps when indicated. The difference in outcome between penetrating
missile wounds and those caused by explosions was not statistically
significant; in the latter group the onset of recovery from focal
conduction block was delayed (mean 4.7 months (2.5 to 10.2)
We describe 261 peripheral nerve injuries sustained
in war by 100 consecutive service men and women injured in Iraq
and Afghanistan. Their mean age was 26.5 years (18.1 to 42.6), the
median interval between injury and first review was 4.2 months (mean
8.4 months (0.36 to 48.49)) and median follow-up was 28.4 months
(mean 20.5 months (1.3 to 64.2)). The nerve lesions were predominantly
focal prolonged conduction block/neurapraxia in 116 (45%), axonotmesis
in 92 (35%) and neurotmesis in 53 (20%) and were evenly distributed
between the upper and the lower limbs. Explosions accounted for
164 (63%): 213 (82%) nerve injuries were associated with open wounds.
Two or more main nerves were injured in 70 patients. The ulnar,
common peroneal and tibial nerves were most commonly injured. In
69 patients there was a vascular injury, fracture, or both at the
level of the nerve lesion. Major tissue loss was present in 50 patients:
amputation of at least one limb was needed in 18. A total of 36 patients
continued in severe neuropathic pain. This paper outlines the methods used in the assessment of these
injuries and provides information about the depth and distribution
of the nerve lesions, their associated injuries and neuropathic
pain syndromes.
The surgical approaches used to expose fractures of both bones of the forearm vary depending on the site and type of fracture and the degree of comminution; all have limitations. An exposure is described which allows access to most of the radius and ulna through a single skin incision.