We retrospectively reviewed 40 hips in 36 patients who had undergone acetabular reconstruction using a titanium Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allografts between May 2001 and April 2006. Impacted bone allografts were used for the management of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Type II defects in 17 hips, and bulk bone allografts together with impacted allografts were used for the management of Type III defects in 23 hips. A total of five hips showed radiological failure at a mean follow-up of 6.7 years (4.5 to 9.3), two of which were infected. The mean pre-operative Merle d’Aubigné score was 10 (5 to 15) vs 13.6 (9 to 18) at the latest follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate at ten years, calculated using radiological failure or revision of the acetabular component for any reason as the endpoint, was 87% (95% confidence interval 76.3 to 97.7). A separate experimental analysis of the mechanical properties of the device and the load-displacement properties of bone grafts showed that a structurally hard allograft resected from femoral heads of patients with osteoarthritis should be preferentially used in any type of defect. If impacted bone allografts were used, a bone graft thickness of < 25 mm was acceptable in Type II defects.

This clinical study indicates that revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allografts yielded satisfactory mid-term results.

Despite extensive experience with prosthetic replacement for the reconstruction of limbs following juxta-articular resection of tumours, there are few reports of prosthetic replacement of the distal radius. We present two cases of massive bone defects of the distal radius in which alumina ceramic prosthetic replacements were used. We evaluated the patients more than ten years after the procedure. Both patients had degenerative changes to the wrist. This, however, was not associated with pain or decreased function, and both had returned to their previous occupation after surgery.

When a patient has a massive defect of the distal radius, reconstruction using a ceramic prosthesis is a reasonable alternative to using autograft. This method of treatment results in little pain, a moderate range of movement and satisfactory function.

Multiple tumours of peripheral nerves are often seen in patients with neurofibromatosis of type 1 or 2. Multiple schwannomas may occur without other manifestations of neurofibromatosis.

We have reviewed 12 patients with multiple schwannomas arising from peripheral lesions who did not fulfil the criteria for either type of neurofibromatosis. Four had spinal and one an intracranial lesion in addition to the peripheral tumours. Two patients had one and three café-au-lait spots, respectively, and another had a probable family history. The largest tumours were 45 to 250 mm in size. Three patients had been referred as having von Recklinghausen’s disease.

The large size of tumours, the difficulties of histological diagnosis on biopsy, and the confusion with neurofibromatosis can lead to overtreatment. Malignant change seldom, if ever, occurs in patients with multiple schwannomas.