The pathogenesis of intraneural ganglion cysts is controversial.
Recent reports in the literature described medial plantar intraneural
ganglion cysts (mIGC) with articular branches to subtalar joints.
The aim of the current study was to provide further support for
the principles underlying the articular theory, and to explain the
successes and failures of treatment of mICGs. Between 2006 and 2017, five patients with five mICGs were retrospectively
reviewed. There were five men with a mean age of 50.2 years (33
to 68) and a mean follow-up of 3.8 years (0.8 to 6). Case history,
physical examination, imaging, and intraoperative findings were
reviewed. The outcomes of interest were ultrasound and/or MRI features
of mICG, as well as the clinical outcomes.Aims
Patients and Methods
The primary aim of this study was to define the standard minimum
follow-up required to produce a reliable estimate of the rate of
re-operation after radial head arthroplasty (RHA). The secondary
objective was to define the leading reasons for re-operation. Four electronic databases, between January 2000 and March 2017
were searched. Articles reporting reasons for re-operation (Group
I) and results (Group II) after RHA were included. In Group I, a
meta-analysis was performed to obtain the standard minimum follow-up,
the mean time to re-operation and the reason for failure. In Group
II, the minimum follow-up for each study was compared with the standard
minimum follow-up.Aims
Materials and Methods
Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) may be used in the treatment of
non-reconstructable radial head fractures. The aim of this study
was to evaluate the mid-term clinical and radiographic results of
RHA. Between 2002 and 2014, 77 RHAs were implanted in 54 men and 23
women with either acute injuries (54) or with traumatic sequelae
(23) of a fracture of the radial head. Four designs of RHA were
used, including the Guepar (Small Bone Innovations (SBi)/Stryker;
36), Evolutive (Aston Medical; 24), rHead RECON (SBi/Stryker; ten)
or rHead STANDARD (SBi/Stryker; 7) prostheses. The mean follow-up
was 74.0 months (standard deviation (Aims
Patients and Methods
We retrospectively analysed the clinical results of 30 patients with injuries of the sternoclavicular joint at a minimum of 12 months’ follow-up. A closed reduction was attempted in 14 cases. It was successful in only five of ten dislocations, and failed in all four epiphyseal disruptions. A total of 25 patients underwent surgical reduction, in 18 cases in conjunction with a stabilisation procedure. At a mean follow-up of 60 months, four patients were lost to follow-up. The functional results in the remainder were satisfactory, and 18 patients were able to resume their usual sports activity at the same level. There was no statistically significant difference between epiphyseal disruption and sternoclavicular dislocation (p >
0.05), but the functional scores (Simple Shoulder Test, Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand, and Constant scores) were better when an associated stabilisation procedure had been performed rather than reduction alone (p = 0.05, p = 0.04 and p = 0.07, respectively). We recommend meticulous pre-operative clinical assessment with CT scans. In sternoclavicular dislocation managed within the first 48 hours and with no sign of mediastinal complication, a closed reduction can be attempted, although this was unsuccessful in half of our cases. A control CT scan is mandatory. In all other cases, and particularly if epiphyseal disruption is suspected, we recommend open reduction with a stabilisation procedure by costaclavicular cerclage or tenodesis. The use of a Kirschner wire should be avoided.
