We present our experience of forearm lengthening
in children with various conditions performed by a single surgeon between
1995 and 2009. A total of 19 children with a mean age of 9.8 years
(2.1 to 15.9) at the time of surgery had 22 forearm lengthenings
using either an Ilizarov/spatial and Ilizarov circular frame or
a monolateral external fixator. The patients were divided into two
groups: group A, in whom the purpose of treatment was to restore
the relationship between the radius and the ulna, and group B, in
whom the objective was to gain forearm length. The mean follow-up after
removal of the frame was 26 months (13 to 53). There were ten patients (11 forearms) in group A with a mean
radioulnar discrepancy of 2.4 cm (1.5 to 3.3) and nine patients
(11 forearms) in group B. In group A, the mean lengthening achieved
was 2.7 cm (1.0 to 5.5), with a lengthening index of 11.1 weeks/cm.
Equalisation or overcorrection of the discrepancy was achieved in
seven of 11 forearms, but lengthening was only partially successful
at preventing subluxation or dislocation of the radial head. In
group B, the mean lengthening achieved was 3.8 cm (1.9 to 6.8),
with a lengthening index of 7.25 weeks/cm. Common complications
in both groups were pin-site infection and poor regenerate formation. Forearm lengthening by distraction osteogenesis is a worthwhile
procedure in children that can improve cosmesis and function, particularly
in patients with shortening of both radius and ulna.
Our aim in this prospective radiological study was to determine whether the flexibility rate calculated from radiographs obtained during forced traction under general anaesthesia, was better than that of fulcrum-bending radiographs before corrective surgery in predicting the extent of the available correction in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. We evaluated 33 patients with a Cobb angle >
60° on a standing posteroanterior radiograph, who had been treated by posterior correction. Pre-operative standing fulcrum-bending radiographs and those with forced-traction under general anaesthesia were obtained. Post-operative standing radiographs were taken after surgical correction. The mean forced-traction flexibility rate was 55% ( Radiographs obtained during forced traction under general anaesthesia were better at predicting the flexibility of the curve than fulcrum-bending radiographs in curves with a Cobb angle >
60° in the standing position and may identify those patients for whom supplementary anterior surgery can be avoided.
Implantation of allograft bone is an integral part of revision surgery of the hip. One major concern with its use is the risk of transmission of infective agents. There are a number of methods of processing allograft bone in order to reduce this risk. One method requires washing the tissue using pulsed irrigation immediately before implantation. We report the incidence of deep bacterial infection in 138 patients (144 revision hip arthroplasties) who had undergone implantation of allograft bone. The bone used was fresh-frozen, non-irradiated and pulse-washed with normal saline before implantation. The deep infection rate at a minimum follow-up of one year was 0.7%. This method of processing appears to be associated with a very low risk of allograft-related bacterial infection.
We determined the rate of contamination of donated femoral heads at primary hip arthroplasty within a single region between July 1992 and July 2001. We established the null hypothesis that culture results played no role in predicting early failure of the joint because of infection. The rate of contamination was 9%. A positive culture, at the time of retrieval, was found in 367 of 4045 femoral heads. Coagulase-negative staphylococcus was isolated in 77% of the positive cases. At a minimum follow-up of one year, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of complications or of revision of age-matched patients whose femoral heads had a positive culture compared with those whose femoral heads were sterile. Our findings confirm that culture of the femoral head plays no part in determining future failure of joint replacement in the donor.