Periprosthetic fracture and implant loosening are two of the major reasons for revision surgery of cementless implants. Optimal implant fixation with minimal bone damage is challenging in this procedure. This pilot study investigates whether vibratory implant insertion is gentler compared to consecutive single blows for acetabular component implantation in a surrogate polyurethane (PU) model. Acetabular components (cups) were implanted into 1 mm nominal under-sized cavities in PU foams (15 and 30 per cubic foot (PCF)) using a vibratory implant insertion device and an automated impaction device for single blows. The impaction force, remaining polar gap, and lever-out moment were measured and compared between the impaction methods.Aims
Methods
The aim of the study was to investigate whether the primary stability of press-fit acetabular components can be improved by altering the impaction procedure. Three impaction procedures were used to implant acetabular components into human cadaveric acetabula using a powered impaction device. An impaction frequency of 1 Hz until complete component seating served as reference. Overimpaction was simulated by adding ten strokes after complete component seating. High-frequency implantation was performed at 6 Hz. The lever-out moment of the acetabular components was used as measure for primary stability. Permanent bone deformation was assessed by comparison of double micro-CT (µCT) measurements before and after impaction. Acetabular component deformation and impaction forces were recorded, and the extent of bone-implant contact was determined from 3D laser scans.Aims
Methods
Loosening of pedicle screws is a major complication of posterior
spinal stabilisation, especially in the osteoporotic spine. Our
aim was to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation compared with
extended dorsal instrumentation on the stability of posterior spinal
fixation. A total of 12 osteoporotic human cadaveric spines (T11-L3) were
randomised by bone mineral density into two groups and instrumented
with pedicle screws: group I (SHORT) separated T12 or L2 and group
II (EXTENDED) specimen consisting of T11/12 to L2/3. Screws were
augmented with cement unilaterally in each vertebra. Fatigue testing
was performed using a cranial-caudal sinusoidal, cyclic (1.0 Hz)
load with stepwise increasing peak force.Aims
Materials and Methods
The early failure and revision of bimodular primary
total hip arthroplasty prostheses requires the identification of the
risk factors for material loss and wear at the taper junctions through
taper wear analysis. Deviations in taper geometries between revised
and pristine modular neck tapers were determined using high resolution
tactile measurements. A new algorithm was developed and validated
to allow the quantitative analysis of material loss, complementing
the standard visual inspection currently used. The algorithm was applied to a sample of 27 retrievals ( Cite this article:
