There is little information about the management
of peri-prosthetic fracture of the humerus after total shoulder replacement
(TSR). This is a retrospective review of 22 patients who underwent
a revision of their original shoulder replacement for peri-prosthetic
fracture of the humerus with bone loss and/or loose components.
There were 20 women and two men with a mean age of 75 years (61
to 90) and a mean follow-up 42 months (12 to 91): 16 of these had
undergone a previous revision TSR. Of the 22 patients, 12 were treated
with a long-stemmed humeral component that bypassed the fracture.
All their fractures united after a mean of 27 weeks (13 to 94).
Eight patients underwent resection of the proximal humerus with
endoprosthetic replacement to the level of the fracture. Two patients
were managed with a clam-shell prosthesis that retained the original
components. The mean Oxford shoulder score (OSS) of the original
TSRs before peri-prosthetic fracture was 33 (14 to 48). The mean
OSS after revision for fracture was 25 (9 to 31). Kaplan-Meier survival
using re-intervention for any reason as the endpoint was 91% (95%
confidence interval (CI) 68 to 98) and 60% (95% CI 30 to 80) at
one and five years, respectively. There were two revisions for dislocation of the humeral head,
one open reduction for modular humeral component dissociation, one
internal fixation for nonunion, one trimming of a prominent screw
and one re-cementation for aseptic loosening complicated by infection,
ultimately requiring excision arthroplasty. Two patients sustained
nerve palsies. Revision TSR after a peri-prosthetic humeral fracture associated
with bone loss and/or loose components is a salvage procedure that
can provide a stable platform for elbow and hand function. Good
rates of union can be achieved using a stem that bypasses the fracture.
There is a high rate of complications and function is not as good as
with the original replacement.
Scapulothoracic fusion (STF) for painful winging
of the scapula in neuromuscular disorders can provide effective pain
relief and functional improvement, but there is little information
comparing outcomes between patients with dystrophic and non-dystrophic
conditions. We performed a retrospective review of 42 STFs in 34
patients with dystrophic and non-dystrophic conditions using a multifilament
trans-scapular, subcostal cable technique supported by a dorsal
one-third semi-tubular plate. There were 16 males and 18 females
with a mean age of 30 years (15 to 75) and a mean follow-up of 5.0
years (2.0 to 10.6). The mean Oxford shoulder score improved from
20 (4 to 39) to 31 (4 to 48). Patients with non-dystrophic conditions
had lower overall functional scores but achieved greater improvements
following STF. The mean active forward elevation increased from
59° (20° to 90°) to 97° (30° to 150°), and abduction from 51° (10°
to 90°) to 83° (30° to 130°) with a greater range of movement achieved
in the dystrophic group. Revision fusion for nonunion was undertaken
in five patients at a mean time of 17 months (7 to 31) and two required
revision for fracture. There were three pneumothoraces, two rib
fractures, three pleural effusions and six nonunions. The main risk
factors for nonunion were smoking, age and previous shoulder girdle surgery. STF is a salvage procedure that can provide good patient satisfaction
in 82% of patients with both dystrophic and non-dystrophic pathologies,
but there was a relatively high failure rate (26%) when poor outcomes
were analysed. Overall function was better in patients with dystrophic
conditions which correlated with better range of movement; however,
patients with non-dystrophic conditions achieved greater functional
improvement.