To compare time dependent functional improvement for patients with medial, respectively lateral knee osteoarthritis (OA) after treatment with opening wedge osteotomy relieving the pressure on the osteoarthritic part of the knee. In all, 49 patients (52 knees) with a mean age of 47 years (31 to 64) underwent high tibial osteotomies (HTO), and 24 patients with a mean age of 48 years (31 to 62) low femoral osteotomies (LFO) with opening wedge technique due to medial, respectively lateral knee OA with malalignment. All osteotomies were stabilized with a Puddu plate and bone grafting performed in the same time period (2000 to 2008). The patients were evaluated by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pre-operatively and at six months, and at one, two, five, and ten years postoperatively. The knee OA was graded according to the Ahlbäck and Kellgren-Lawrence radiological scoring systems.Aims
Methods
The aim of this prospective randomised study was to compare the
time course of clinical improvement during the first two years following
a closing or opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). It was hypothesised
that there would be no differences in clinical outcome between the
two techniques. Between 2007 and 2013, 70 consecutive patients were randomly
allocated to undergo either a closing or opening wedge HTO. All
patients had medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA), and were aged
between 30 years and 60 years. They were evaluated by independent
investigators pre-operatively and at three and six months, and one
and two years post-operatively using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis
Outcome Score (KOOS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Lysholm score,
the Tegner activity score, the University of California, Los Angeles
(UCLA) activity scale and range of movement (ROM).Aims
Patients and Methods
We analysed the results of 93 tibial shaft fractures treated with the Grosse-Kempf locked nail. Twenty-six fractures were comminuted, 19 were open grade I to II, and 54 were located outside the middle third of the tibia. The deep infection rate was 3.2%. There were only two poor results. The use of this method is recommended and discussed.
