Total knee replacement (TKR) is an operation
that can be performed with or without the use of a tourniquet. Meta-analyses
of the available Level-1 studies have demonstrated that the use
of a tourniquet leads to a significant reduction in blood loss.
The opponents for use of a tourniquet cite development of complications
such as skin bruising, neurovascular injury, and metabolic disturbance
as drawbacks. Although there may certainly be reason for concern
in arteriopathic patients, there is little evidence that routine
use of a tourniquet during TKR results in any of the above complications.
The use of a tourniquet, on the other hand, provides a bloodless
field that allows the surgeon to perform the procedure with expediency
and optimal visualisation. Blood conservation has gained great importance
in recent years due to increased understanding of the problems associated
with blood transfusion, such as increased surgical site infection
(due to immunomodulation effect), increased length of hospital stay
and increased cost. Based on the authors’ understanding of the available
evidence, the routine use of a tourniquet during TKR is justified
as good surgical practice. Cite this article:
Orthopaedic surgeons have accepted various radiological
signs to be representative of acetabular retroversion, which is
the main characteristic of focal over-coverage in patients with
femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Using a validated method for
radiological analysis, we assessed the relevance of these signs
to predict intra-articular lesions in 93 patients undergoing surgery
for FAI. A logistic regression model to predict chondral damage
showed that an acetabular retroversion index (ARI) >
20%, a derivative
of the well-known cross-over sign, was an independent predictor
(p = 0.036). However, ARI was less significant than the Tönnis classification
(p = 0.019) and age (p = 0.031) in the same model. ARI was unable
to discriminate between grades of chondral lesions, while the type
of cam lesion (p = 0.004) and age (p = 0.047) were able to. Other
widely recognised signs of acetabular retroversion, such as the
ischial spine sign, the posterior wall sign or the cross-over sign
were irrelevant according to our analysis. Regardless of its secondary
predictive role, an ARI >
20% appears to be the most clinically
relevant radiological sign of acetabular retroversion in symptomatic
patients with FAI. Cite this article:
