During total knee replacement (TKR), surgeons can choose whether or not to resurface the patella, with advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Recently, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended always resurfacing the patella, rather than never doing so. NICE found insufficient evidence on selective resurfacing (surgeon’s decision based on intraoperative findings and symptoms) to make recommendations. If effective, selective resurfacing could result in optimal individualized patient care. This protocol describes a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of primary TKR with always patellar resurfacing compared to selective patellar resurfacing. The PAtellar Resurfacing Trial (PART) is a patient- and assessor-blinded multicentre, pragmatic parallel two-arm randomized superiority trial of adults undergoing elective primary TKR for primary osteoarthritis at NHS hospitals in England, with an embedded internal pilot phase (ISRCTN 33276681). Participants will be randomly allocated intraoperatively on a 1:1 basis (stratified by centre and implant type (cruciate-retaining vs cruciate-sacrificing)) to always resurface or selectively resurface the patella, once the surgeon has confirmed sufficient patellar thickness for resurfacing and that constrained implants are not required. The primary analysis will compare the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) one year after surgery. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcome measures at three months, six months, and one year (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, OKS, EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire, patient satisfaction, postoperative complications, need for further surgery, resource use, and costs). Cost-effectiveness will be measured for the lifetime of the patient. Overall, 530 patients will be recruited to obtain 90% power to detect a four-point difference in OKS between the groups one year after surgery, assuming up to 40% resurfacing in the selective group.Aims
Methods
A recent report from France suggested an association between the use of cobalt-chrome (CoCr) femoral heads in total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and an increased risk of dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure. CoCr is a commonly used material in orthopaedic implants. If the reported association is causal, the consequences would be significant given the millions of joint arthroplasties and other orthopaedic procedures in which CoCr is used annually. We examined whether CoCr-containing THAs were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, heart outcomes, cancer, and neurodegenerative disorders in a large national database. Data from the National Joint Registry was linked to NHS English hospital inpatient episodes for 374,359 primary THAs with up to 14.5 years' follow-up. We excluded any patients with bilateral THAs, knee arthroplasties, indications other than osteoarthritis, aged under 55 years, and diagnosis of one or more outcome of interest before THA. Implants were grouped as either containing CoCr or not containing CoCr. The association between implant construct and the risk of all-cause mortality and incident heart failure, cancer, and neurodegenerative disorders was examined.Aims
Methods
Debate remains whether the patella should be resurfaced during total knee replacement (TKR). For non-resurfaced TKRs, we estimated what the revision rate would have been if the patella had been resurfaced, and examined the risk of re-revision following secondary patellar resurfacing. A retrospective observational study of the National Joint Registry (NJR) was performed. All primary TKRs for osteoarthritis alone performed between 1 April 2003 and 31 December 2016 were eligible (n = 842,072). Patellar resurfacing during TKR was performed in 36% (n = 305,844). The primary outcome was all-cause revision surgery. Secondary outcomes were the number of excess all-cause revisions associated with using TKRs without (versus with) patellar resurfacing, and the risk of re-revision after secondary patellar resurfacing.Aims
Methods
We compared implant and patient survival following intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IOPFFs) during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with matched controls. This retrospective cohort study compared 4831 hips with IOPFF and 48 154 propensity score matched primary THAs without IOPFF implanted between 2004 and 2016, which had been recorded on a national joint registry. Implant and patient survival rates were compared between groups using Cox regression.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to determine whether the rates of revision
for metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with Pinnacle
components varied according to the year of the initial operation,
and compare these with the rates of revision for other designs of
MoM THA. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales included
36 mm MoM THAs with Pinnacle acetabular components which were undertaken
between 2003 and 2012 with follow-up for at least five years (n
= 10 776) and a control group of other MoM THAs (n = 13 817). The
effect of the year of the primary operation on all-cause rates of revision
was assessed using Cox regression and interrupted time-series analysis.Aims
Patients and Methods
To determine the outcomes following revision surgery of metal-on-metal
hip arthroplasties (MoMHA) performed for adverse reactions to metal
debris (ARMD), and to identify factors predictive of re-revision. We performed a retrospective observational study using National
Joint Registry (NJR) data on 2535 MoMHAs undergoing revision surgery
for ARMD between 2008 and 2014. The outcomes studied following revision were
intra-operative complications, mortality and re-revision surgery.
Predictors of re-revision were identified using competing-risk regression
modelling.Aims
Patients and Methods
Few studies have assessed outcomes following non-metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty (non-MoMHA) revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). We assessed outcomes following non-MoMHA revision surgery performed for ARMD, and identified predictors of re-revision. We performed a retrospective observational study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. All non-MoMHAs undergoing revision surgery for ARMD between 2008 and 2014 were included (185 hips in 185 patients). Outcome measures following ARMD revision were intra-operative complications, mortality and re-revision surgery. Predictors of re-revision were identified using Cox regression.Objectives
Methods
To determine ten-year failure rates following 36 mm metal-on-metal
(MoM) Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty (THA), and identify predictors
of failure. We retrospectively assessed a single-centre cohort of 569 primary
36 mm MoM Pinnacle THAs (all Corail stems) followed up since 2012
according to Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulation Agency
recommendations. All-cause failure rates (all-cause revision, and
non-revised cross-sectional imaging failures) were calculated, with predictors
for failure identified using multivariable Cox regression.Aims
Patients and Methods
We investigated whether blood metal ion levels could effectively
identify patients with bilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR)
implants who have adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). Metal ion levels in whole blood were measured in 185 patients
with bilateral BHRs. Patients were divided into those with ARMD
who either had undergone a revision for ARMD or had ARMD on imaging
(n = 30), and those without ARMD (n = 155). Receiver operating characteristic
analysis was used to determine the optimal thresholds of blood metal
ion levels for identifying patients with ARMD.Aims
Patients and Methods
T-cells are considered to play an important role in the inflammatory response causing arthroplasty failure. The study objectives were to investigate the composition and distribution of CD4+ T-cell phenotypes in the peripheral blood (PB) and synovial fluid (SF) of patients undergoing revision surgery for failed metal-on-metal (MoM) and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) hip arthroplasties, and in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty. In this prospective case-control study, PB and SF were obtained from 22 patients (23 hips) undergoing revision of MoM (n = 14) and MoP (n = 9) hip arthroplasties, with eight controls provided from primary hip osteoarthritis cases awaiting arthroplasty. Lymphocyte subtypes in samples were analysed using flow cytometry.Objectives
Methods
The aims of this study were to compare the diagnostic test characteristics
of ultrasound alone, metal artefact reduction sequence MRI (MARS-MRI)
alone, and ultrasound combined with MARS-MRI for identifying intra-operative
pseudotumours in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) patients
undergoing revision surgery. This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study involved 39 patients
(40 MoMHRs). The time between imaging modalities was a mean of 14.6
days (0 to 90), with imaging performed at a mean of 5.3 months (0.06
to 12) before revision. The prevalence of intra-operative pseudotumours
was 82.5% (n = 33).Aims
Methods
We undertook a retrospective cohort study to
determine clinical outcomes following the revision of metal-on-metal (MoM)
hip replacements for adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD), and
to identify predictors of time to revision and outcomes following
revision. Between 1998 and 2012 a total of 64 MoM hips (mean age
at revision of 57.8 years; 46 (72%) female; 46 (72%) hip resurfacings
and 18 (28%) total hip replacements) were revised for ARMD at one specialist
centre. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (1.0 to 14.6) from revision
for ARMD there were 13 hips (20.3%) with post-operative complications
and eight (12.5%) requiring re-revision. The Kaplan–Meier five-year survival rate for ARMD revision was
87.9% (95% confidence interval 78.9 to 98.0; 19 hips at risk). Excluding
re-revisions, the median absolute Oxford hip score (OHS) following
ARMD revision using the percentage method (0% best outcome and 100%
worst outcome) was 18.8% (interquartile range (IQR) 7.8% to 48.3%),
which is equivalent to 39/48 (IQR 24.8/48 to 44.3/48) when using
the modified OHS. Histopathological response did not affect time
to revision for ARMD (p = 0.334) or the subsequent risk of re-revision
(p = 0.879). Similarly, the presence or absence of a contralateral
MoM hip bearing did not affect time to revision for ARMD (p = 0.066)
or the subsequent risk of re-revision (p = 0.178). Patients revised to MoM bearings had higher rates of re-revision
(five of 16 MoM hips re-revised; p = 0.046), but those not requiring
re-revision had good functional results (median absolute OHS 14.6%
or 41.0/48). Short-term morbidity following revision for ARMD was
comparable with previous reports. Caution should be exercised when choosing
bearing surfaces for ARMD revisions. Cite this article:
The Oxford hip and knee scores (OHS and OKS)
are validated patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing
total hip replacement (THR), hip resurfacing (HR), total knee replacement
(TKR) and unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). We analysed the
absolute OHS and OKS and change in scores following THR, HR, TKR,
and UKR performed at one specialist centre. All patients undergoing
and completing at least one Oxford score were eligible for inclusion
in the study which included 27 950 OHS and 19 750 OKS in 13 682
patients. Data were analysed using non-linear quantile regression.
The median absolute Oxford scores for THR, HR, TKR and UKR were
pre-operative 68.8% (15.0/48), 58.3% (20.0/48), 66.7% (16.0/48),
60.4% (19.0/48) respectively: and post-operative asymptote was 14.6%
(41.0/48), 5.8% (45.2/48), 31.2% (33.0/48), 29.2% (34.0/48). The
median asymptotic change from the pre-operative score for THR, HR,
TKR and UKR were 47.9% (23.0/48), 47.9% (23.0/48), 33.3% (16.0/48)
and 32.4% (15.5/48), respectively. The median time at which no further
appreciable change in score was achieved post-operatively was 0.7
years for THR, 1.1 years for HR, 0.9 years for TKR and 1.1 years
for UKR. The curves produced from this analysis could be used to educate
patients, and to audit the performance of a surgeon and an institution.
The time to achieve a stable improvement in outcome varied between
different types of joint replacement, which may have implications
for the timing of post-operative review. Cite this article:
We hypothesised that the use of computer navigation-assisted
surgery for pelvic and sacral tumours would reduce the risk of an
intralesional margin. We reviewed 31 patients (18 men and 13 women)
with a mean age of 52.9 years (13.5 to 77.2) in whom computer navigation-assisted
surgery had been carried out for a bone tumour of the pelvis or
sacrum. There were 23 primary malignant bone tumours, four metastatic
tumours and four locally advanced primary tumours of the rectum.
The registration error when using computer navigation was <
1 mm
in each case. There were no complications related to the navigation,
which allowed the preservation of sacral nerve roots (n = 13), resection
of otherwise inoperable disease (n = 4) and the avoidance of hindquarter
amputation (n = 3). The intralesional resection rate for primary
tumours of the pelvis and sacrum was 8.7% (n = 2): clear bone resection
margins were achieved in all cases. At a mean follow-up of 13.1
months (3 to 34) three patients (13%) had developed a local recurrence.
The mean time alive from diagnosis was 16.8 months (4 to 48). Computer navigation-assisted surgery is safe and has reduced
our intralesional resection rate for primary tumours of the pelvis
and sacrum. We recommend this technique as being worthy of further
consideration for this group of patients. Cite this article:
We report the long-term survival and functional
outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) in patients aged <
50 years at operation, and explore the factors affecting survival.
Between 1997 and 2006, a total of 447 BHRs were implanted in 393
patients (mean age 41.5 years (14.9 to 49.9)) by one designing surgeon.
The mean follow-up was 10.1 years (5.2 to 14.7), with no loss to
follow-up. In all, 16 hips (3.6%) in 15 patients were revised, giving
an overall cumulative survival of 96.3% (95% confidence interval
(CI) 93.7 to 98.3) at ten years and 94.1% (95% CI 84.9 to 97.3)
at 14 years. Using aseptic revision as the endpoint, the survival
for men with primary osteoarthritis (n = 195) was 100% (95% CI 100
to 100) at both ten years and 14 years, and in women with primary
osteoarthritis (n = 109) it was 96.1% (95% CI 90.1 to 99.9) at ten
years and 91.2% (95% CI 68.6 to 98.7) at 14 years. Female gender
(p = 0.047) and decreasing femoral head size (p = 0.044) were significantly
associated with an increased risk of revision. The median Oxford
hip score (OHS, modified as a percentage with 100% indicating worst
outcome) at last follow-up was 4.2% (46 of 48; interquartile range
(IQR) 0% to 24%) and the median University of California, Los Angeles
(UCLA) score was 6.0 (IQR 5 to 8). Men had significantly better
OHS (p = 0.02) and UCLA scores (p = 0.01) than women. The BHR provides
excellent survival and functional results in men into the second
decade, with good results achieved in appropriately selected women. Cite this article:
