This study reviews the past 30 years of research from the Canadian Orthopedic Trauma Society (COTS), to identify predictive factors that delay or accelerate the course of randomized controlled trials in orthopaedic trauma. We conducted a methodological review of all papers published through the Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society or its affiliates. Data abstracted included: year of publication; journal of publication; study type; number of study sites; sample size; and achievement of sample size goals. Information about the study timelines was also collected, including: the date of study proposal to COTS; date recruitment began; date recruitment ended; and date of publication.Aims
Methods
Coronal plane fractures of the posterior femoral
condyle, also known as Hoffa fractures, are rare. Lateral fractures are
three times more common than medial fractures, although the reason
for this is not clear. The exact mechanism of injury is likely to
be a vertical shear force on the posterior femoral condyle with
varying degrees of knee flexion. These fractures are commonly associated
with high-energy trauma and are a diagnostic and surgical challenge. Hoffa
fractures are often associated with inter- or supracondylar distal
femoral fractures and CT scans are useful in delineating the coronal
shear component, which can easily be missed. There are few recommendations
in the literature regarding the surgical approach and methods of
fixation that may be used for this injury. Non-operative treatment
has been associated with poor outcomes. The goals of treatment are
anatomical reduction of the articular surface with rigid, stable
fixation to allow early mobilisation in order to restore function.
A surgical approach that allows access to the posterior aspect of
the femoral condyle is described and the use of postero-anterior
lag screws with or without an additional buttress plate for fixation
of these difficult fractures. Cite this article:
We randomised prospectively 44 patients with fractures of the shaft of the humerus to open reduction and internal fixation by either an intramedullary nail (IMN) or a dynamic compression plate (DCP). Patients were followed up for a minimum of six months. There were no significant differences in the function of the shoulder and elbow, as determined by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons’ score, the visual analogue pain score, range of movement, or the time taken to return to normal activity. There was a single case of shoulder impingement in the DCP group and six in the IMN group. Of these six, five occurred after antegrade insertion of an IMN. In the DCP group three patients developed complications, compared with 13 in the IMN group. We had to perform secondary surgery on seven patients in the IMN group, but on only one in the DCP group (p = 0.016). Our findings suggest that open reduction and internal fixation with a DCP remains the best treatment for unstable fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Fixation by IMN may be indicated for specific situations, but is technically more demanding and has a higher rate of complications.
We have devised a new scoring system using visual analogue scales (VAS) to determine the functional outcome in 15 patients with 20 displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures, confirmed by CT. The average follow-up was 19 months. A VAS was completed separately by the patient, the surgeon and an independent assessor. It showed satisfactory agreement between observers and strong correlations with a General Health Survey (SF36), a pain scale (McGill Pain Questionnaire) and a disease-specific, historical scale for calcaneal fractures (the Rowe score).
