Femoral revision component subsidence has been identified as predicting early failure in revision hip surgery. This comparative cohort study assessed the potential risk factors of subsidence in two commonly used femoral implant designs. A comparative cohort study was undertaken, analyzing a consecutive series of patients following revision total hip arthroplasties using either a tapered-modular (TM) fluted titanium or a porous-coated cylindrical modular (PCM) titanium femoral component, between April 2006 and May 2018. Clinical and radiological assessment was compared for both treatment cohorts. Risk factors for subsidence were assessed and compared.Aims
Methods
We compared the mechanical properties of carbon fibre composite bone plates with those of stainless steel and titanium. The composite plates have less stiffness with good fatigue properties. Tissue culture and small animal implantation confirmed the biocompatibility of the material. We also present a preliminary report on the use of the carbon fibre composite plates in 40 forearm fractures. All fractures united, 67% of them showing radiological remodelling within six months. There were no refractures or mechanical failures, but five fractures showed an unexpected reaction; this is discussed.
Five patients suffered injuries around the wrist complicated by acute tunnel syndrome. Pain associated with median nerve paraesthesia or hypo-aesthesia are indications for urgent treatment; in four patients where operation was delayed, the outcome was poor.
Two cases of congenital pseudarthrosis of the ulna due to neurofibromatosis are reported. Similar radiographic changes in the ulna were found, with distortion of the capitulum and part of the trochlea and bowing of the radius. In one patient the head of the radius was dislocated and in the other it dislocated readily during pronation. A possible mechanism to explain the findings was suggested. On the basis of these and a review of the literature it is recommended that the main aim of treatment should be maintenance of the normal relative lengths of the radius and ulna by early excision of the pseudarthrosis to remove the restraining effect of the abnormal ulna. This will allow normal development of the lower end of the humerus and radius and prevent dislocation of the radial head.
An analysis of 142 dislocations from a multicentre study of 6774 total hip replacements is reported. The incidence of dislocation was 2.1 per cent. Patients with neuromuscular disorder, those in a confused mental state, and those undergoing revision operations are at special risk. The commonest surgical error, present in nearly half the patients, was placing the acetabular cup too vertically or too anteverted. A less common fault was placing the femoral component too anteverted. Neither the original pathology nor the approach to the hip appeared to affect the likelihood of dislocation. The dislocations were divided into early and late, single and recurrent, and the success rate of treatment is described in these groups. One hundred and eleven patients (78.2 per cent) eventually obtained stability. Of those with a single dislocation, 62 per cent remained stable after a single manipulation. Thirty-four per cent of the patients required an open operation to achieve stability and it is suggested that, in many cases, open reduction alone is not enough; the mechanical fault needs to be corrected.