To compare rates of serious adverse events in patients undergoing revision knee arthroplasty with consideration of the indication for revision (urgent versus elective indications), and compare these with primary arthroplasty and re-revision arthroplasty. Patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty were identified in the national Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) between 1 April 1997 to 31 March 2017. Subsequent revision and re-revision arthroplasty procedures in the same patients and same knee were identified. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality and a logistic regression model was used to investigate factors associated with 90-day mortality and secondary adverse outcomes, including infection (undergoing surgery), pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Urgent indications for revision arthroplasty were defined as infection or fracture, and all other indications (e.g. loosening, instability, wear) were included in the elective indications cohort.Aims
Methods
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery in children and the adolescent population has increased steadily over recent years. We used a national database to look at trends in ACL reconstruction and rates of serious complications, growth disturbance, and revision surgery, over 20 years. All hospital episodes for patients undergoing ACL reconstruction, under the age of 20 years, between 1 April 1997 and 31 March 2017, were extracted by procedure code from the national Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). Population standardized rates of intervention were determined by age group and year of treatment. Subsequent rates of serious complications including reoperation for infection, growth disturbance (osteotomy, epiphysiodesis), revision reconstruction, and/or contralateral ACL reconstruction rates were determined.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to determine the long-term risk of undergoing knee arthroplasty in a cohort of patients with meniscal tears who had undergone arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). A retrospective national cohort of patients with a history of isolated APM was identified over a 20-year period. Patients with prior surgery to the same knee were excluded. The primary outcome was knee arthroplasty. Hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted by patient age, sex, year of APM, Charlson comorbidity index, regional deprivation, rurality, and ethnicity. Risk of arthroplasty in the index knee was compared with the patient’s contralateral knee (with Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK) Meniscal Consensus Project was to develop an evidence-based treatment guideline for patients with meniscal lesions of the knee. A formal consensus process was undertaken applying nominal group, Delphi, and appropriateness methods. Consensus was first reached on the terminology relating to the definition, investigation, and classification of meniscal lesions. A series of simulated clinical scenarios was then created and the appropriateness of arthroscopic meniscal surgery or nonoperative treatment in each scenario was rated by the group. The process was informed throughout by the latest published, and previously unpublished, clinical and epidemiological evidence. Scenarios were then grouped together based upon the similarity of clinical features and ratings to form the guideline for treatment. Feedback on the draft guideline was sought from the entire membership of BASK before final revisions and approval by the consensus group.Aims
Materials and Methods
Aims
Materials and Methods
We reviewed the long-term clinical and radiological
results of 63 uncemented Low Contact Stress (LCS) total knee replacements
(TKRs) in 47 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The mean age of
the patients at the time of surgery was 69 years (53 to 81). At
a mean follow-up of 22 years (20 to 25), 12 patients were alive
(17 TKRs), 27 had died (36 TKRs), and eight (ten TKRs) were lost
to follow-up. Revision was necessary in seven patients (seven TKRs, 11.1%)
at a mean of 12.1 years (0 to 19) after surgery. In the surviving
ten patients who had not undergone revision (15 TKRs), the mean
Oxford knee score was 30.2 (16 to 41) at a mean follow-up of 19.5
years (15 to 24.7) and mean active flexion was 105° (90° to 150°).
The survival rate was 88.9% at 20 years (56 of 63) and the Kaplan–Meier
survival estimate, without revision, was 80.2% (95% confidence interval
37 to 100) at 25 years. Cite this article:
The Gamma nail is frequently used in unstable
peri-trochanteric hip fractures. We hypothesised that mechanical failure
of the Gamma nail was associated with inadequate proximal three-point
fixation. We identified a consecutive series of 299 Gamma nails
implanted in 299 patients over a five-year period, 223 of whom fulfilled
our inclusion criteria for investigation. The series included 61
men and 162 women with a mean age of 81 years (20 to 101). Their fractures
were classified according to the Modified Evans’ classification
and the quality of fracture reduction was graded. The technical
adequacy of three points of proximal fixation was recorded from
intra-operative fluoroscopic images, and technical inadequacy for
each point was defined. All patients were followed to final follow-up
and mechanical failures were identified. A multivariate statistical
analysis was performed, adjusting for confounders. A total of 16
failures (7.2%) were identified. The position of the lag screw relative
to the lateral cortex was the most important point of proximal fixation,
and when inadequate the failure rate was 25.8% (eight of 31: odds
ratio 7.5 (95% confidence interval 2.5 to 22.7), p <
0.001). Mechanical failure of the Gamma nail in peri-trochanteric femoral
fractures is rare (<
1%) when three-point proximal fixation is
achieved. However, when proximal fixation is inadequate, failure
rates increase. The strongest predictor of failure is positioning
the lateral end of the lag screw short of the lateral cortex. Adherence
to simple technical points minimises the risk of fixation failure
in this vulnerable patient group. Cite this article:
