Cervical radiculopathy is a significant cause of pain and morbidity. For patients with severe and poorly controlled symptoms who may not be candidates for surgical management, treatment with transforaminal epidural steroid injections (CTFESI) has gained widespread acceptance. However, a paucity of high-quality evidence supporting their use balanced against perceived high risks of the procedure potentially undermines the confidence of clinicians who use the technique. We undertook a systematic review of the available literature regarding CTFESI to assess the clinical efficacy and complication rates of the procedure. OVID, MEDLINE, and Embase database searches were performed independently by two authors who subsequently completed title, abstract, and full-text screening for inclusion against set criteria. Clinical outcomes and complication data were extracted, and a narrative synthesis presented.Aims
Methods
The October 2023 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Cutting through surgical smoke: the science of cleaner air in spinal operations; Unlocking success: key factors in thoracic spine decompression and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; Deep learning algorithm for identifying cervical cord compression due to degenerative canal stenosis on radiography; Surgeon experience influences robotics learning curve for minimally invasive lumbar fusion; Decision-making algorithm for the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis of L4/L5; Response to preoperative steroid injections predicts surgical outcomes in patients undergoing fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis.
With resumption of elective spine surgery services in the UK following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a multicentre British Association of Spine Surgeons (BASS) collaborative study to examine the complications and deaths due to COVID-19 at the recovery phase of the pandemic. The aim was to analyze the safety of elective spinal surgery during the pandemic. A prospective observational study was conducted from eight spinal centres for the first month of operating following restoration of elective spine surgery in each individual unit. Primary outcome measure was the 30-day postoperative COVID-19 infection rate. Secondary outcomes analyzed were the 30-day mortality rate, surgical adverse events, medical complications, and length of inpatient stay.Aims
Methods
To evaluate safety outcomes and patient satisfaction of the re-introduction of elective orthopaedic surgery on ‘green’ (non-COVID-19) sites during the COVID-19 pandemic. A strategy consisting of phased relaxation of clinical comorbidity criteria was developed. Patients from the orthopaedic waiting list were selected according to these criteria and observed recommended preoperative isolation protocols. Surgery was performed at green sites (two local private hospitals) under the COVID-19 NHS contract. The first 100 consecutive patients that met the Phase 1 criteria and underwent surgery were included. In hospital and postoperative complications with specific enquiry as to development of COVID-19 symptoms or need and outcome for COVID-19 testing at 14 days and six weeks was recorded. Patient satisfaction was surveyed at 14 days postoperatively.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic
outcomes of microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar stenosis
and concurrent degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), and to determine
the effect of this procedure on spinal stability. A total of 304 consecutive patients with single-level lumbar
DS with concomitant stenosis underwent microendoscopic laminotomy
without fusion between January 2004 and December 2010. Patients
were divided into two groups, those with and without advanced DS
based on the degree of spondylolisthesis and dynamic instability. A
total of 242 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 101
men and 141 women. Their mean age was 68.1 years (46 to 85). Outcome
was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Roland
Morris Disability Questionnaire scores, a visual analogue score
for pain and the Short Form Health-36 score. The radiographic outcome
was assessed by measuring the slip and the disc height. The clinical
and radiographic parameters were evaluated at a mean follow-up of
4.6 years (3 to 7.5).Aims
Patients and Methods
The aims of this study were to describe the prevalence of previous
lumbar surgery in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA)
and to investigate their patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) one year
post-operatively. Data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register and the Swedish
Spine Register gathered from 2002 to 2013 were merged to identify
a group of patients who had undergone lumbar surgery before THA
(n = 997) and a carefully matched one-to-one control group. We investigated
differences in the one-year post-operative PROMs between the groups.
Linear regression analyses were used to explore the associations
between previous lumbar surgery and these PROMs following THA. The
prevalence of prior lumbar surgery was calculated as the ratio of
patients identified with previous lumbar surgery between 2002 and
2012, and divided by the total number of patients who underwent
a THA in 2012.Aims
Patients and Methods
The December 2012 Spine Roundup360 looks at: the Japanese neck disability index; adjacent segment degeneration; sacroiliac loads determined by limb length discrepancy; whether epidural steroids improve outcome in lumbar disc herniation; spondylodiscitis in infancy; total pedicle screws; and iliac crest autograft complications.
We compared a group of 46 somatised patients with a control group of 41 non-somatised patients who had undergone elective surgery to the lumbar spine in an attempt to identify pre-operative factors which could predict the outcome. In a prospective single-centre study, the Distress and Risk Assessment method consisting of a modified somatic perception questionnaire and modified Zung depression index was used pre-operatively to identify somatised patients. The type and number of consultations were correlated with functional indicators of outcome, such as the Oswestry disability index and a visual analogue score for pain in the leg after follow-up for six and 12 months. Similar improvements in the Oswestry disability index were found in the somatised and non-somatised groups. Somatised patients who had a good outcome on the Oswestry disability index had an increased number of orthopaedic consultations (50 of 83 patients (60%) vs 29 of 73 patients (39.7%); p = 0.16) and waited less time for their surgery (5.5 months) (
We have assessed whether an epidural steroid injection is effective in the treatment of symptoms due to compression of a nerve root in the lumbar spine by carrying out a prospective, randomised, controlled trial in which patients received either an epidural steroid injection or an intramuscular injection of local anaesthetic and steroid. We assessed a total of 93 patients according to the Oxford pain chart and the Oswestry disability index and followed up for a minimum of two years. All the patients had been categorised as potential candidates for surgery. There was a significant reduction in pain early on in those having an epidural steroid injection but no difference in the long term between the two groups. The rate of subsequent operation in the groups was similar.
