We studied the effect of the surface finish of the stem on the transfer of load in the proximal femur in a sheep model of cemented hip arthroplasty. Strain-gauge analysis and corresponding finite-element (FE) analysis were performed to assess the effect of friction and creep at the cement-stem interface.

No difference was seen between the matt and polished stems. FE analysis showed that the effects of cement creep and friction at the stem-cement interface on femoral strain were small compared with the effect of inserting a cemented stem.

Our aim was to determine whether in vitro studies would detect differences in the cellular response to wear particles of two titanium alloys commonly used in the manufacture of joint replacement prostheses. Particles were of the order of 1 μm in diameter representative of those found adjacent to failed prostheses.

Exposure of human monocytes to titanium 6-aluminium 4- vanadium (TiAlV) at concentrations of 4 x 10⁷ particles/ml produced a mean prostaglandin E₂ release of 2627.6 pM; this was significantly higher than the 317.4 pM induced by titanium 6-aluminium 7-niobium alloy (TiAlNb) particles (p = 0.006). Commercially-pure titanium particles induced a release of 347.8 pM. In addition, TiAlV stimulated significantly more release of the other cell mediators, interleukin-1, tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-6. At lower concentrations of particles there was less mediator release and less obvious differences between materials. None of the materials caused significant toxicity.

The levels of inflammatory mediators released by phagocytic cells in response to wear particles may influence the amount of periprosthetic bone loss. Our findings have shown that in vitro studies can detect differences in cellular response induced by particles of similar titanium alloys in common clinical use, although in vivo studies have shown little difference. While in vitro studies should not be used as the only form of assessment, they must be considered when assessing the relative biocompatibility of different implant materials.

In the assessment of fracture healing by monitoring stiffness with vibrational analysis or instrumented external fixators, it has been assumed that there is a workable correlation between stiffness and strength. We used four-point bending tests to study time-related changes in stiffness and strength in healing tibial fractures in sheep. We aimed to test the validity of the measurement of stiffness to assess fracture strength.

At each duration of healing examined, we found marked variations in stiffness and strength. Stiffness was shown to be load-dependent: measurements at higher loads reflected ultimate strength more accurately. There was a biphasic relationship between stiffness and strength: at first there was a strong correlation regardless of loading conditions, but in the second phase, which included the period of ‘clinical healing’, stiffness and strength were not significantly correlated.

We conclude that the monitoring of stiffness is useful primarily in assessing progress towards union but is inherently limited as an assessment of strength at the time of clinical union. Any interpretation of stiffness must take into account the load conditions.