Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 5, Issue 10 | Pages 490 - 491
1 Oct 2016
Ghert M McKee M


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 6 | Pages 829 - 836
1 Jun 2005
Kreder HJ Hanel DP Agel J McKee M Schemitsch EH Trumble TE Stephen D

A total of 179 adult patients with displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius was randomised to receive indirect percutaneous reduction and external fixation (n = 88) or open reduction and internal fixation (n = 91). Patients were followed up for two years. During the first year the upper limb musculoskeletal function assessment score, the SF-36 bodily pain sub-scale score, the overall Jebsen score, pinch strength and grip strength improved significantly in all patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the radiological restoration of anatomical features or the range of movement between the groups.

During the period of two years, patients who underwent indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation had a more rapid return of function and a better functional outcome than those who underwent open reduction and internal fixation, provided that the intra-articular step and gap deformity were minimised.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 5 | Pages 726 - 731
1 Sep 1996
Kreder HJ Hanel DP McKee M Jupiter J McGillivary G Swiontkowski MF

We sought to quantify agreement by different assessors of the AO classification for distal fractures of the radius. Thirty radiographs of acute distal radial fractures were evaluated by 36 assessors of varying clinical experience.

Our findings suggest that AO ‘type’ and the presence or absence of articular displacement are measured with high consistency when classification of distal radial fractures is undertaken by experienced observers. Assessors at all experience levels had difficulty agreeing on AO ‘group’ and especially AO ‘subgroup’. To categorise distal radial fractures according to joint displacement and AO type is simple and reproducible.

Our study examined only whether distal radial fractures could be consistently classified according to the AO system. Validation of the classification as a predictor of outcome will require a prospective clinical study.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 77-B, Issue 4 | Pages 665 - 666
1 Jul 1995
McKee M Jupiter J


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 76-B, Issue 4 | Pages 614 - 621
1 Jul 1994
McKee M Jupiter J Toh C Wilson L Colton C Karras K

We reviewed the results of 13 adults of secondary reconstruction of malunited and ununited intraarticular distal humeral fractures. Their average age was 39.7 years, and preoperatively all had pain, loss of motion and functional disability; the average arc of motion was only 43 degrees and the average flexion contracture was 45 degrees. Nine patients had ulnar neuropathy. Elbow reconstruction, at an average of 13.4 months after the original injury, included osteotomy for malunion or debridement for nonunion, realignment with stable fixation and autogenous bone grafts, anterior and posterior capsulectomy and ulnar neurolysis. The elbows were mobilised 24 hours postoperatively. There were no early complications and all nonunions and intra-articular osteotomies healed. After a mean follow-up of 25 months, the average arc of motion was 97 degrees with no progressive radiographic degeneration. Ulnar nerve function improved in all cases and clinical assessment using the Morrey score showed two excellent, eight good and three fair results. Reconstruction of intra-articular malunion and nonunion of the distal humerus in young active adults is technically challenging, but can improve function by restoring the intrinsic anatomy of the elbow.