Proximal humeral fractures are the third most common fracture among the elderly. Complications associated with fixation include screw perforation, varus collapse, and avascular necrosis of the humeral head. To address these challenges, various augmentation techniques to increase medial column support have been developed. There are currently no recent studies that definitively establish the superiority of augmented fixation over non-augmented implants in the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation or bone-graft augmentation versus those who underwent locking-plate fixation without augmentation for proximal humeral fractures. The search was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Articles involving patients with complex proximal humeral fractures treated using open reduction with locking-plate fixation, with or without augmentation, were considered. A meta-analysis of comparative studies comparing locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation or with bone-graft augmentation versus locking-plate fixation without augmentation was performed.Aims
Methods
The primary aim of this prospective, multicentre study is to describe the rates of returning to golf following hip, knee, ankle, and shoulder arthroplasty in an active golfing population. Secondary aims will include determining the timing of return to golf, changes in ability, handicap, and mobility, and assessing joint-specific and health-related outcomes following surgery. This is a multicentre, prospective, longitudinal study between the Hospital for Special Surgery, (New York City, New York, USA) and Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, (Edinburgh, UK). Both centres are high-volume arthroplasty centres, specializing in upper and lower limb arthroplasty. Patients undergoing hip, knee, ankle, or shoulder arthroplasty at either centre, and who report being golfers prior to arthroplasty, will be included. Patient-reported outcome measures will be obtained at six weeks, three months, six months, and 12 months. A two-year period of recruitment will be undertaken of arthroplasty patients at both sites.Aims
Methods
To investigate the impact of the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices on patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) following shoulder arthroplasty. Patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), or hemiarthroplasty (HA) from 2016 to 2018 were identified, along with the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities listed as their secondary diagnoses in the electronic medical records. Patients were matched to our institution’s registry to obtain their PROMs, including shoulder-specific (American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) and Shoulder Activity Scale (SAS)) and general health scales (12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference). Linear regression models adjusting for age and sex were used to evaluate the association between increasing number of comorbidities and PROM scores. A total of 1,817 shoulder arthroplasties were performed: 1,017 (56%) TSA, 726 (40%) RSA, and 74 (4%) HA. The mean age was 67 years (SD 10), and 936 (52%) of the patients were female.Aims
Methods
Acromial fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have a wide range of incidences in reported case series. This study evaluates their incidence following RSA by systematically reviewing the current literature. A systematic review using the search terms “reverse shoulder”, “reverse total shoulder”, or “inverted shoulder” was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases between 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2018. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used. Studies were included if they reported on RSA outcomes and the incidence rate of acromial and/or scapular spine fractures. The rate of these fractures was evaluated for primary RSA, revision RSA, RSA indications, and RSA implant design.Aims
Materials and Methods
The number of rotator cuff repairs that are undertaken is increasing. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is the procedure of choice for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. We sought to determine whether patients who underwent rotator cuff repair and subsequent RSA had different outcomes compared with a matched control group who underwent RSA without a previous rotator cuff repair. All patients with a history of rotator cuff repair who underwent RSA between 2000 and 2015 with a minimum follow-up of two years were eligible for inclusion as the study group. Outcomes, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, were compared with a matched control group of patients who underwent RSA without having previously undergone rotator cuff repair.Aims
Patients and Methods
Few studies have evaluated the relationship between patients’
pre-operative expectations and the outcome of orthopaedic procedures.
Our aim was to determine the effect of expectations on the outcome
after primary anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We hypothesised
that patients with greater expectations would have better outcomes. Patients undergoing primary anatomical TSA completed the Hospital
for Special Surgery’s Shoulder Expectations Survey pre-operatively.
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Shoulder Activity
Scale (SAS), Short-Form-36 (SF-36), and visual analogue scale (VAS)
for pain, fatigue, and general health scores were also collected
pre-operatively and two years post-operatively. Pearson correlations
were used to assess the relationship between the number of expectations
and the outcomes. Differences in outcomes between those with higher
and lower levels of expectations for each expectation were assessed
by independent samples Aims
Patients and Methods
Reverse total shoulder replacement (RTSR) depends
on adequate deltoid function for a successful outcome. However, the
anterior deltoid and/or axillary nerve may be damaged due to prior
procedures or injury. The purpose of this study was to determine
the compensatory muscle forces required for scapular plane elevation
following RTSR when the anterior deltoid is deficient. The soft
tissues were removed from six cadaver shoulders, except for tendon
attachments. After implantation of the RTSR, the shoulders were
mounted on a custom-made shoulder simulator to determine the mean
force in each muscle required to achieve 30° and 60° of scapular
plane elevation. Two conditions were tested: 1) Control with an
absent supraspinatus and infraspinatus; and 2) Control with anterior
deltoid deficiency. Anterior deltoid deficiency resulted in a mean
increase of 195% in subscapularis force at 30° when compared with
the control (p = 0.02). At 60°, the subscapularis force increased
a mean of 82% (p <
0.001) and the middle deltoid force increased
a mean of 26% (p = 0.04). Scapular plane elevation may still be possible following an RTSR
in the setting of anterior deltoid deficiency. When the anterior
deltoid is deficient, there is a compensatory increase in the force
required by the subscapularis and middle deltoid. Attempts to preserve
the subscapularis, if present, might maximise post-operative function.
