In this systematic review, our aim was to explore
whether or not patients are able to return to athletic activity
following lower limb joint replacement. We also investigated any evidence
as to whether participation in athletic activity post-joint replacement
increases complications and reduces implant survival. A PubMed, Embase and Sports Discus search was performed using
the MeSH terms ‘Sport’, ‘Athletic’, ‘Athlete’, ‘Physical’, ‘Activity’,
‘Arthroplasty’, ‘Total Hip Replacement’, ‘Hip Resurfacing’, ‘Total
Knee Replacement’, ‘Unicompartmental Knee Replacement’ and ‘Unicondylar
Knee Replacement’. From this search, duplications were excluded,
the remaining abstracts were reviewed and any unrelated to the search
terms were excluded. The remaining abstracts had their full papers
reviewed. Following joint replacement, participation in sporting activity
is common principally determined by pre-operative patient activity
levels, BMI and patient age. The type of joint replaced is of less
significance. Total time spent performing activity does not change
but tends to be at a lower intensity. There is little evidence in
the literature of an association between high activity levels and
early implant failure. Cite this article:
The results of hip and knee replacement surgery
are generally regarded as positive for patients. Nonetheless, they are
both major operations and have recognised complications. We present
a review of relevant claims made to the National Health Service
Litigation Authority. Between 1995 and 2010 there were 1004 claims
to a value of £41.5 million following hip replacement surgery and
523 claims to a value of £21 million for knee replacement. The most common
complaint after hip surgery was related to residual neurological
deficit, whereas after knee replacement it was related to infection.
Vascular complications resulted in the highest costs per case in
each group. Although there has been a large increase in the number of operations
performed, there has not been a corresponding relative increase
in litigation. The reasons for litigation have remained largely
unchanged over time after hip replacement. In the case of knee replacement,
although there has been a reduction in claims for infection, there
has been an increase in claims for technical errors. There has also
been a rise in claims for non-specified dissatisfaction. This information
is of value to surgeons and can be used to minimise the potential
mismatch between patient expectation, informed consent and outcome. Cite this article:
