In a single-blind, randomised series of knee replacements in 116 patients, we used radiostereometric analysis (RSA) to measure micromotion in three types of tibial implant fixation for two years after knee replacement. We compared hydroxyapatite-augmented porous coating, porous coating, and cemented fixation of the same design of tibial component. At one to two years, porous-coated implants migrated at a statistically significantly higher rate than hydroxyapatite-augmented or cemented implants. There was no significant difference between hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented implants. We conclude that hydroxyapatite augmentation may offer a clinically relevant advantage over a simple porous coating for tibial component fixation, but is no better than cemented fixation.
We used radiostereometric analysis to compare wear rates between uncemented porous sockets and cemented all-polyethylene sockets in a series of 102 hips randomised for either a Harris-Galante or a Charnley cup. Wear was evaluated in 95 hips at a mean of five years (2 to 7). All hips had a cemented, 22 mm head mono-bloc Charnley stem. The mean annual wear rate was 0.09 mm in the Charnley sockets and 0.10 mm in the Harris-Galante sockets, with no statistically significant differences in wear, migration or rotation. We conclude that, up to five years, the wear characteristics of the modular and porous Harris-Galante socket resemble that of the Charnley socket.
A consecutive series of 30 total hip replacements using a hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated, modular implant (Omnifit) was followed clinically and by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis for two years and compared with two control groups, one of 27 cemented Charnley sockets and one of 40 cemented Charnley stems. Omnifit sockets with a central gap between the dome of the socket and the acetabular bone in the postoperative radiographs, migrated less than sockets without such gaps (p = 0.01). After adjustment for patient-related factors (age, gender and weight), no significant difference was found between the two prostheses with respect to micromotion and wear. We conclude that the early fixation of the HA-coated Omnifit prosthesis compares with that of the cemented Charnley prosthesis.
