This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of a randomised clinical trial comparing robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of the primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the robotic arm-assisted group. A total of 139 patients were recruited from a single centre. Patients were randomised to receive either a manual UKA implanted with the aid of traditional surgical jigs, or a UKA implanted with the aid of a tactile guided robotic arm-assisted system. Outcome measures included the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale, Short Form-12, Pain Catastrophising Scale, somatic disease (Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Score), Pain visual analogue scale, analgesic use, patient satisfaction, complications relating to surgery, 90-day pain diaries and the requirement for revision surgery.Objectives
Methods
To investigate the bone penetration of intravenous antibiotic
prophylaxis with flucloxacillin and gentamicin during hip and knee
arthroplasty, and their efficacy against Bone samples from the femoral head, neck and acetabulum were
collected from 18 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA)
and from the femur and tibia in 21 patients during total knee arthroplasty
(TKA). The concentration of both antibiotics in the samples was
analysed using high performance liquid chromatography. Penetration
was expressed as a percentage of venous blood concentration. The
efficacy against common infecting organisms was measured against
both the minimum inhibitory concentration 50, and the more stringent epidemiological
cutoff value for resistance (ECOFF).Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to determine if a change
in antibiotic prophylaxis for routine hip and knee replacement was
associated with an increased risk of acute renal impairment. We identified 238 patients (128 knees and 110 hips) who had received
a single prophylactic dose of 1.5 g cefuroxime before joint replacement.
We compared them with prospectively collected data from 254 patients
(117 knees and 137 hips) who received a single prophylactic dose
of 2 g flucloxacillin and a height- and gender-determined dose of
gentamicin. The primary outcome measure was any new renal impairment
as graded by clinically validated criteria. We identified four patients (1.69%) in the cefuroxime group who
developed renal impairment. All four had mild impairment and all
renal function was normal by the third post-operative day. The incidence
of new-onset renal impairment was significantly higher in the flucloxacillin-and-gentamicin
group at 9.45% (24 patients) (p <
0.001). Three of these patients
remained with acute renal impairment after a week, although the
serum creatinine levels in all subsequently returned to normal. Cite this article:
