Aims. The number of rotator cuff repairs that are undertaken is increasing. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is the procedure of choice for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. We sought to determine whether patients who underwent rotator cuff repair and subsequent RSA had different outcomes compared with a matched control group who underwent RSA without a previous rotator cuff repair. Patients and Methods. All patients with a history of rotator cuff repair who underwent RSA between 2000 and 2015 with a minimum follow-up of two years were eligible for inclusion as the study group. Outcomes, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, were compared with a matched control group of patients who underwent RSA without having previously undergone rotator cuff repair. Results. The study group included 45 patients. Their mean age was 69 years (. sd. 8.6) and 27 patients (60%) were women. The mean ASES score improved from 43.1 to 76.6 two years postoperatively, and to 66.9 five years postoperatively. There was no significant difference between the outcomes at two years in the two groups (all p ≥ 0.05), although there was significantly more improvement in ASES scores in the control group (44.5 vs 33.4; p = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between ASES scores at two and five years when baseline ASES scores were matched in the two groups (p = 0.42 at two years; p = 0.35 at five years). Conclusion. Significant improvements in ASES scores were seen following RSA in patients who had previously undergone rotator cuff repair. They had higher baseline ASES scores than those who had not previously undergone this surgery. However, there was no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups, two years postoperatively. Previous rotator cuff repair does not appear to affect the early outcome after RSA adversely

We describe 20 patients, aged between 43 and 88 years, with delayed nerve palsy or deepening of an initial palsy caused by arterial injury from low-energy injuries to the shoulder. The onset of palsy ranged from immediately after the injury to four months later. There was progression in all the patients with an initial partial nerve palsy. Pain was severe in 18 patients, in 16 of whom it presented as neurostenalgia and in two as causalgia. Dislocation of the shoulder or fracture of the proximal humerus occurred in 16 patients. There was soft-tissue crushing in two and prolonged unconsciousness from alcoholic intoxication in another two. Decompression of the plexus and repair of the arterial injury brought swift relief from pain in all the patients. Nerve recovery was generally good, but less so in neglected cases. The interval from injury to the repair of the vessels ranged from immediately afterwards to 120 days. Delayed onset of nerve palsy or deepening of a nerve lesion is caused by bleeding and/or impending critical ischaemia and is an overwhelming indication for urgent surgery. There is almost always severe neuropathic pain

Shoulder arthrodesis is often used to treat flail shoulder after a brachial plexus injury, but has a high complication rate and entails loss of passive mobility. We have reviewed 27 patients with brachial plexus injury treated by transfer of the trapezius to the proximal humerus at an average time from injury of 31.3 months. Pre-operatively, all 27 shoulders were subluxated, with an average abduction of 3.5 degrees. Postoperatively, shoulder abduction averaged 45.4 degrees, and subluxation was abolished. All patients were satisfied with their improvement in function. Trapezius transfer is recommended as a simple procedure that requires only a brief period in hospital, allows early rehabilitation, and gives a satisfactory outcome, while retaining passive mobility of the shoulder

1 . The concept of the capsular mechanism of the shoulder joint with regard to recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder has been defined and a survey of the literature presented. 2. An anatomical, including an embryological, investigation of shoulder joints with special reference to the structure and function of the glenoid labrum and to the variations in the arrangement of the gleno-humeral ligaments and the synovial recesses of the anterior capsular mechanism is reported. The labrum, which is generally believed to be a consistent, fibrocartilaginous structure, is shown to be a redundant portion of capsular tissue and a continuation of the capsule as it attaches to the osseous glenoid rim. The fibrocartilaginous element is confined to a small transition zone at the capsular attachment in the great majority of cases. The great variability in the arrangement of the gleno-humeral ligaments and synovial recesses is stressed, and it is shown that an anterior pouch of variable size is present when the middle gleno-humeral ligament is attached to the scapular neck and not to the labrum. 3. The basic lesions of the anterior capsular mechanism found at operation for recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder in twenty-five consecutive cases using a modified Bankart procedure with a standard anterior approach to the joint are reported, and the findings are correlated with the results of the anatomical investigation. In most cases the lesions were found to be of the Bankart type with or without avulsion of the periosteum of the scapular neck. In four cases, however, the soft-tissue attachment to the anterior glenoid rim was intact; in those cases a large synovial pouch was present and the middle gleno-humeral ligament was either not discernible or it arose from the scapular neck. In all cases a postero-lateral notch on the humeral head was palpable and laxity of the subscapularis could be demonstrated. When measured, the joint capacity was always greatly augmented. 4. The present work shows, from a basic standpoint, that Bankart's original idea that the recurrent state was due to the failure of healing of the fractured fibrocartilaginous glenoid labrum is no longer tenable. 5. Finally, the anomalous attachment or the insufficient development of the middle gleno-humeral ligament in certain cases of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation is shown to provide the anatomical basis for the recurrent state in these cases; this is the weak area in the antero-inferior part of the capsule which has been described in the literature for the past hundred years. Thus we have returned to the original view of Hippocrates

1. At an operation for recurrent posterior dislocation of the shoulder observations were made on the mechanism, head defect, method of reduction, and the position of greatest stability. 2. Experimentally, avulsion of the glenoid labrum in a monkey was shown to be capable of sound repair without operation. 3. In the treatment of primary posterior dislocation it is suggested that the position of abduction, lateral rotation and extension is favourable for the approximation of the stripped labrum and capsule to the glenoid rim, and for an effective buttress after cicatrisation. 4. If the risk of recurrence is to be reduced to a minimum the shoulder should be retained in the position of greatest stability for at least four weeks, to allow firm union of the avulsed soft tissues. 5. This position for an optimum buttress would also apply after surgical repair for recurrent posterior dislocation

Of 545 consecutive patients with anterior shoulder dislocations, 108 (20%) were aged 60 years or more at the time of injury. We reviewed and radiographed 95 of these elderly patients after a mean follow-up of 7.1 years. Axillary nerve injuries were seen in 9.3% of the 108 patients, but all recovered completely in 3 to 12 months. There were single or multiple recurrences of dislocation in 21 patients (22.1%), but within this group age had no influence on the tendency to redislocate. Tears of the rotator-cuff were diagnosed by imaging studies or clinically in 58 patients (61%), including all who had redislocations. Sixteen patients required surgery. Eight with a single dislocation and a cuff tear had only repair of the torn cuff. Of the eight patients with multiple dislocations requiring operation, five also had a torn cuff and needed either a stabilising procedure and a cuff repair or repair of the cuff only. All patients who were operated on had a satisfactory result, with the exception of those with multiple redislocations and a cuff tear who had repair of the cuff only. Anterior shoulder dislocation in elderly subjects is more common than is generally believed; 20% suffer redislocation and 60% have a cuff tear. Operation may be needed to repair a torn cuff or to stabilise the shoulder. Patients with multiple redislocations will probably require both procedures

We have undertaken a prospective clinical and radiological analysis of 124 shoulder arthroplasties (113 patients) carried out for osteoarthritis. The clinical results showed improvement in the absolute Constant score and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of 22 and 43, respectively. Both were statistically significant (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the scores after hemiarthroplasty and total arthroplasty in those patients with an intact rotator cuff. When revision was used as the end-point for survival at ten years, survival of 86%, or 90% if glenoid components made of Hylamer sterilised in air were omitted, was obtained in primary osteoarthritis. The most common cause for revision in the hemiarthroplasty group was glenoid pain at a mean of 1.5 years; in the total arthroplasty group it was loosening of the glenoid at a mean of 4.5 years. Analysis of pre-operative factors showed that the risk of gross loosening of the glenoid increased threefold when there was evidence of erosion of the glenoid at operation. Shoulder arthroplasty should not be delayed once symptomatic osteoarthritis has been established and should be undertaken before failure of the cuff or erosion of the glenoid are present

Using a dynamic biomechanical model of malunion of the shoulder, we have determined the change in deltoid force required for abduction with various combinations of superior and posterior displacement of fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus. We tested eight fresh human cadaver shoulders in a dynamic shoulder-testing apparatus during cycles of glenohumeral abduction from 0° to 90°. The greater tuberosities were osteotomised and stabilised to represent malunion with combinations of superior and posterior displacements of 1 cm and less. The peak force was measured for each displacement in each specimen and statistically compared with values of no displacement using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. The abduction force was significantly increased by 16% (p = 0.006) and 27% (p = 0.0001) by superior displacements of 0.5 cm and 1 cm, respectively, while combined superior and posterior displacement of 1 cm gave an increase in force of 29% (p = 0.001). While treatment criteria for acceptable residual displacement of the greater tuberosity are widely used, there is little information on the direct biomechanical effects of displacement on shoulder mechanics. Although the results of conservative treatment are influenced by a number of factors, including associated injuries, rehabilitation and the pre-existing function of the shoulder, our data suggest that small amounts of residual displacement may alter the balance of forces required to elevate the arm at the glenohumeral joint

Resurfacing of the humeral head is commonly used within the UK to treat osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder. We present the results of a small prospective randomised study of this procedure using the Global CAP prosthesis with two different coatings, Porocoat and DuoFix hydroxyapatite (HA). We followed two groups of ten patients with OA of the shoulder for two years after insertion of the prosthesis with tantalum marker beads, recording pain, Constant–Murley and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) outcome scores, and using radiostereometric analysis to assess migration. The outcomes were similar to those of other series, with significant reductions in pain (p = 0.003) and an improvement in the Constant (p = 0.001) and ASES scores (p = 0.006). The mean migration of the prosthesis three months post-operatively was 0.78 mm (0.51 to 1.69) and 0.72 mm (0.33 to 1.45) for the Porocoat and DuoFix groups, respectively. Analysis of variance indicated that the rate of migration reached a plateau after three months post-operatively in both groups. At follow-up of two years the mean migration was 1 mm (. sd. 1 (0.25 to 3.32)); in the Porocoat group and 0.8 mm (. sd. 0.4 (0.27 to 1.45)) in the DuoFix HA group. Significant migration of the prosthesis was seen in one patient who had received an anterior humeral bone graft. This prosthesis was later revised after 2.7 years. The addition of a coating of HA to the sintered surface does not improve fixation of this prosthesis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1077–81

We report seven cases in which open or closed reduction of a shoulder dislocation associated with a fracture of the humeral neck led to displacement of the neck fracture. Avascular necrosis of the humeral head developed in all six patients with anatomical neck fractures. All five anterior dislocations also had a fracture of the greater tuberosity and both posterior dislocations had a fracture of the lesser tuberosity. The neck fracture had not initially been recognised in three of the seven cases. In five cases attempted shoulder reduction led to complete displacement of the head segment, which was treated by open reduction and minimal internal fixation. In the other two cases, shoulder reduction caused only mild to moderate displacement which was accepted and the fracture was treated conservatively. We conclude that biplane radiography is essential before reduction of a shoulder dislocation. Neck fractures must always be ruled out, especially where there are tuberosity fractures. In our series, careful closed reduction under general anaesthesia with optimal relaxation and fluoroscopic control did not prevent iatrogenic displacement. Prophylactic stabilisation of the neck fracture should be considered before reduction of such a fracture-dislocation. It may be, however, that the prevention of displacement by prophylactic stabilisation does not always prevent late avascular necrosis; we observed this in one case

We performed eight osteochondral autologous transplantations from the knee joint to the shoulder. All patients (six men, two women; mean age 43.1 years) were documented prospectively. In each patient the stage of the osteochondral lesion was Outerbridge grade IV with a mean size of the affected area of 150 mm. 2. All patients were assessed by using the Constant score for the shoulder and the Lysholm score for the knee. Standard radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy were used to assess the presence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and the integrity of the grafts. After a mean of 32.6 months (8 to 47), the mean Constant score increased significantly. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed good osseointegration of the osteochondral plugs and congruent articular cartilage at the transplantation site in all but one patient. Second-look arthroscopy performed in two cases revealed a macroscopically good integration of the autograft with an intact articular surface. Osteochondral autologous transplantation in the shoulder appears to offer good clinical results for treating full-thickness osteochondral lesions of the glenohumeral joint. However, our study suggests that the development of osteoarthritis and the progression of pre-existing osteoarthritic changes cannot be altered by this technique

The management and outcome of treatment in 42 patients (49 shoulders) with an infected shoulder prosthesis was reviewed in a retrospective multicentre study of 2343 prostheses. The factors which were analysed included the primary diagnosis, the delay between the diagnosis of infection and treatment and the type of treatment. Treatment was considered to be successful in 30 patients (71%). Previous surgery and radiotherapy were identified as risk factors for the development of infection. All patients with an infected prosthesis had pain and limitation of movement and 88% showed radiological loosening. In 50% of the shoulders, the antibiotics chosen and the length of treatment were considered not to be optimal. The mean follow-up was 34 months. Antibiotics or debridement alone were ineffective. In acute infection, immediate revision with excision of all infected tissue and exchange of the prosthesis with appropriate antibiotic therapy gave the best results. Multidisciplinary collaboration is recommended

We report a randomised controlled trial to examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic acromioplasty in the treatment of stage II shoulder impingement syndrome. A total of 140 patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups: supervised exercise programme (n = 70, exercise group) and arthroscopic acromioplasty followed by a similar exercise programme (n = 70, combined treatment group). The main outcome measure was self-reported pain on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 10 at 24 months, measured on the 134 patients (66 in the exercise group and 68 in the combined treatment group) for whom endpoint data were available. An intention-to-treat analysis disclosed an improvement in both groups but without statistically significant difference in outcome between the groups (p = 0.65). The combined treatment was considerably more costly. Arthroscopic acromioplasty provides no clinically important effects over a structured and supervised exercise programme alone in terms of subjective outcome or cost-effectiveness when measured at 24 months. Structured exercise treatment should be the basis for treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome, with operative treatment offered judiciously until its true merit is proven

1. A case of recurrent posterior subluxation of the shoulder is described. After failure of a soft-tissue repair, a posterior bone block operation was performed. 2. The distinction between traumatic dislocations with tearing of the capsule or of the glenoid labrum, and habitual luxations from laxity of the capsule, is emphasised. Although the anterior rim of the glenoid was detached in this case, it is considered to fall into the latter category. 3. A posterior bone block provides a simple and efficient form of repair in this type of case. It is free from the disadvantage of causing limitation of rotation at the shoulder joint; it employs a principle which might well merit more application than at present in the repair of anterior dislocations

A new technique of shoulder fusion is presented using a posterior approach. After removal of the articular cartilage, a Rush pin is introduced from the spine of the scapula, through the glenoid into the medullary canal of the humerus. This is supplemented by tension-band wiring from the acromion to the neck of the humerus and a muscle pedicle graft attached to the acromion. A shoulder spica is applied for four to six weeks. Four patients with injuries to the upper brachial plexus and 14 with paralysis of the upper arm due to anterior poliomyelitis have been followed for three years. One of the 18 patients developed nonunion; she had removed her own cast prematurely. This method of fixation provides high shear resistance and low axial stiffness without deforming plastically. It does not affect bone growth in young patients, is effective in patients with osteoporosis, and gives a high rate of union