Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 141 - 143 of 143
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 6 | Pages 685 - 696
1 Jun 2008
Robinson CM Jenkins PJ Markham PE Beggs I

The sternoclavicular joint is vulnerable to the same disease processes as other synovial joints, the most common of which are instability from injury, osteoarthritis, infection and rheumatoid disease. Patients may also present with other conditions, which are unique to the joint, or are manifestations of a systemic disease process. The surgeon should be aware of these possibilities when assessing a patient with a painful, swollen sternoclavicular joint.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 7 | Pages 1006 - 1011
1 Jul 2005
Hatano H Ogose A Hotta T Endo N Umezu H Morita T

We examined osteochondral autografts, obtained at a mean of 19.5 months (3 to 48) following extracorporeal irradiation and re-implantation to replace bone defects after removal of tumours. The specimens were obtained from six patients (mean age 13.3 years (10 to 18)) and consisted of articular cartilage (five), subchondral bone (five), external callus (one) and tendon (one). The tumour cells in the grafts were eradicated by a single radiation dose of 60 Gy. In three cartilage specimens, viable chondrocytes were detected. The survival of chondrocytes was confirmed with S-100 protein staining. Three specimens from the subchondral region and a tendon displayed features of regeneration. Callus was seen at the junction between host and irradiated bone.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1292 - 1297
1 Sep 2005
Lietman SA Inoue N Rafiee B Deitz LW Chao EYS

We used a canine intercalary bone defect model to determine the effects of recombinant human osteogenic protein 1 (rhOP-1) on allograft incorporation. The allograft was treated with an implant made up of rhOP-1 and type I collagen or with type I collagen alone.

Radiographic analysis showed an increased volume of periosteal callus in both test groups compared with the control group at weeks 4, 6, 8 and 10. Mechanical testing after 12 weeks revealed increased maximal torque and stiffness in the rhOP-1 treated groups compared with the control group.

These results indicate a benefit from the use of an rhOP-1 implant in the healing of bone allografts. The effect was independent of the position of the implant. There may be a beneficial clinical application for this treatment.