Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1381 - 1385 of 1385
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1178 - 1181
1 Sep 2005
Harrison WJ


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 6 | Pages 790 - 795
1 Jun 2006
Ahlmann ER Menendez LR Kermani C Gotha H

We reviewed retrospectively the results in 211 consecutive patients who had undergone limb salvage for bone neoplasia with endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur (96), distal femur (78), proximal tibia (30) and total femur (7). Their mean age was 50 years (11 to 86) and the mean follow-up period was 37.3 months (1 to 204). A total of 35 (16.6%) prostheses failed. Overall, implant survival was 78% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29 to 0.54) at five years, 60% (95% CI 0.93 to 2.35) at ten years and 60% (95% CI 1.27 to 3.88) at 15 years. Survivorship of the limb was 97.6% (95% CI 1.73 to 3.35) at ten years. The gender, age, diagnosis and location of the tumour were not prognostic variables for failure. Modular endoprosthetic replacement in the lower limb is a durable long-term reconstructive option, with the implants generally outlasting the patient.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1320 - 1327
1 Oct 2005
Karlsson MK Gerdhem P Ahlborg HG


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 5 | Pages 608 - 617
1 May 2005
Bauer HCF


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1121 - 1136
1 Sep 2006
Petrie A

Although the importance of sound statistical principles in the design and analysis of data has gained prominence in recent years, biostatistics, the application of statistics to the analysis of biological and medical data, is still a subject which is poorly understood and often mishandled. This review introduces, in the context of orthopaedic research, the terminology and the principles involved in simple data analysis, and outlines areas of medical statistics that have gained prominence in recent years. It also lists and provides an insight into some of the more common errors that occur in published orthopaedic journals and which are frequently encountered at the review stage in papers submitted to the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.