Revision total hip replacement (THR) for young
patients is challenging because of technical complexity and the potential
need for subsequent further revisions. We have assessed the survivorship,
functional outcome and complications of this procedure in patients
aged <
50 years through a large longitudinal series with consistent treatment
algorithms. Of 132 consecutive patients (181 hips) who underwent
revision THR, 102 patients (151 hips) with a mean age of 43 years
(22 to 50) were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 11 years (2 to 26)
post-operatively. We attempted to restore bone stock with allograft
where indicated. Using further revision for any reason as an end point,
the survival of the acetabular component was 71% ( This overall perspective on the mid- to long-term results is
valuable when advising young patients on the prospects of revision
surgery at the time of primary replacement. Cite this article:
Arthroplasty registries are important for the
surveillance of joint replacements and the evaluation of outcome. Independent
validation of registry data ensures high quality. The ability for
orthopaedic implant retrieval centres to validate registry data
is not known. We analysed data from the National Joint Registry
for England, Wales and Northern Ireland (NJR) for primary metal-on-metal
hip arthroplasties performed between 2003 and 2013. Records were
linked to the London Implant Retrieval Centre (RC) for validation.
A total of 67 045 procedures on the NJR and 782 revised pairs of
components from the RC were included. We were able to link 476 procedures
(60.9%) recorded with the RC to the NJR successfully. However, 306
procedures (39.1%) could not be linked. The outcome recorded by the
NJR (as either revised, unrevised or death) for a primary procedure
was incorrect in 79 linked cases (16.6%). The rate of registry-retrieval
linkage and correct assignment of outcome code improved over time.
The rates of error for component reference numbers on the NJR were
as follows: femoral head category number 14/229 (5.0%); femoral head
batch number 13/232 (5.3%); acetabular component category number
2/293 (0.7%) and acetabular component batch number 24/347 (6.5%). Registry-retrieval linkage provided a novel means for the validation
of data, particularly for component fields. This study suggests
that NJR reports may underestimate rates of revision for many types
of metal-on-metal hip replacement. This is topical given the increasing
scope for NJR data. We recommend a system for continuous independent
evaluation of the quality and validity of NJR data. Cite this article:
The February 2014 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: length of stay; cementless metaphyseal fixation; mortality trends in over 400,000 total hip replacements; antibiotics in hip fracture surgery; blood supply to the femoral head after dislocation; resurfacing and THR in metal-on-metal replacement; diabetes and hip replacement; bone remodelling over two decades following hip replacement; and whether bisphosphonates affect acetabular fixation.
We report the clinical and radiological outcome of 86 revisions of cemented hip arthroplasties using JRI-Furlong hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated acetabular and femoral components. The acetabular component was revised in 62 hips and the femoral component in all hips. The mean follow-up was 12.6 years and no patient was lost to follow-up. The mean age of the patients was 71.2 years. The mean Harris hip and Oxford scores were 82 (59 to 96) and 23.4 (14 to 40), respectively. The mean Charnley modification of the Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score was 5 (3 to 6) for pain, 4.9 (3 to 6) for movement and 4.4 (3 to 6) for mobility. Migration of the acetabular component was seen in two hips and the mean acetabular inclination was 42.6°. The mean linear polyethylene wear was 0.05 mm/year. The mean subsidence of the femoral component was 1.9 mm and stress shielding was seen in 23 (28%) with bony ingrowth in 76 (94%). Heterotopic ossification was seen in 12 hips (15%). There were three re-revisions, two for deep sepsis and one for recurrent dislocation and there were no re-revisions for aseptic loosening. The mean EuroQol EQ-5D description scores and health thermometer scores were 0.69 (0.51 to 0.89) and 79 (54 to 95), respectively. With an end-point of definite or probable loosening, the probability of survival at 12 years was 93.9% and 95.6% for the acetabular and femoral components, respectively. Overall survival at 12 years, with removal or further revision of either component for any reason as the end-point, was 92.3%. Our study supports the continued use of this arthroplasty and documents the durability of hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated components.
Total hip replacement (THR) after acetabular
fracture presents unique challenges to the orthopaedic surgeon.
The majority of patients can be treated with a standard THR, resulting
in a very reasonable outcome. Technical challenges however include
infection, residual pelvic deformity, acetabular bone loss with
ununited fractures, osteonecrosis of bone fragments, retained metalwork,
heterotopic ossification, dealing with the sciatic nerve, and the
difficulties of obtaining long-term acetabular component fixation.
Indications for an acute THR include young patients with both femoral
head and acetabular involvement with severe comminution that cannot
be reconstructed, and the elderly, with severe bony comminution.
The outcomes of THR for established post-traumatic arthritis include
excellent pain relief and functional improvements. The use of modern
implants and alternative bearing surfaces should improve outcomes
further. Cite this article:
The conventional method for reconstructing acetabular
bone loss at revision surgery includes using structural bone allograft.
The disadvantages of this technique promoted the advent of metallic
but biocompatible porous implants to fill bone defects enhancing
initial and long-term stability of the acetabular component. This
paper presents the indications, surgical technique and the outcome
of using porous metal acetabular augments for reconstructing acetabular
defects. Cite this article:
Despite the increasing interest and subsequent published literature on hip resurfacing arthroplasty, little is known about the prevalence of its complications and in particular the less common modes of failure. The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of failure of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and to analyse the reasons for it. From a multi-surgeon series (141 surgeons) of 5000 Birmingham hip resurfacings we have analysed the modes, prevalence, gender differences and times to failure of any hip requiring revision. To date 182 hips have been revised (3.6%). The most common cause for revision was a fracture of the neck of the femur (54 hips, prevalence 1.1%), followed by loosening of the acetabular component (32 hips, 0.6%), collapse of the femoral head/avascular necrosis (30 hips, 0.6%), loosening of the femoral component (19 hips, 0.4%), infection (17 hips, 0.3%), pain with aseptic lymphocytic vascular and associated lesions (ALVAL)/metallosis (15 hips, 0.3%), loosening of both components (five hips, 0.1%), dislocation (five hips, 0.1%) and malposition of the acetabular component (three hips, 0.1%). In two cases the cause of failure was unknown. Comparing men with women, we found the prevalence of revision to be significantly higher in women (women = 5.7%; men = 2.6%, p <
0.001). When analysing the individual modes of failure women had significantly more revisions for loosening of the acetabular component, dislocation, infection and pain/ALVAL/metallosis (p <
0.001, p = 0.004, p = 0.008, p = 0.01 respectively). The mean time to failure was 2.9 years (0.003 to 11.0) for all causes, with revision for fracture of the neck of the femur occurring earlier than other causes (mean 1.5 years, 0.02 to 11.0). There was a significantly shorter time to failure in men (mean 2.1 years, 0.4 to 8.7) compared with women (mean 3.6 years, 0.003 to 11.0) (p <
0.001).
The August 2013 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: are we getting it right first time?; tantalum augments in revision hip surgery; lower wear in dual mobility?; changing faces changes outcomes; synovial fluid aspiration in MOM hips; taper disease: the new epidemic of hip surgery; the super-obese and THR; and whether well fixed stems can remain in infected hips
Impaction bone grafting for the reconstitution
of bone stock in revision hip surgery has been used for nearly 30 years.
Between 1995 and 2001 we used this technique in acetabular reconstruction,
in combination with a cemented component, in 304 hips in 292 patients
revised for aseptic loosening. The only additional supports used
were stainless steel meshes placed against the medial wall or laterally
around the acetabular rim to contain the graft. All Paprosky grades
of defect were included. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were
collected in surviving patients at a minimum of ten years after
the index operation. Mean follow-up was 12.4 years ( Cite this article:
We reviewed 44 consecutive revision hip replacements in 38 patients performed using the cement-in-cement technique. All were performed for acetabular loosening in the presence of a well-fixed femoral component. The mean follow-up was 5.1 years (2 to 10.1). Radiological analysis at final follow-up indicated no loosening of the femoral component, except for one case with a continuous radiolucent line in all zones and peri-prosthetic fracture which required further revision. Peri-operative complications included nine proximal femoral fractures (20.4%) and perforation of the proximal femur in one hip. In five hips wiring or fixation with a braided suture was undertaken but no additional augmentation was required. There was an improvement in the mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association score from 55.5 (28 to 81) pre-operatively to 77.8 (40 to 95) at final follow-up (p <
0.001). Revision using a cement-in-cement technique allows increased exposure for acetabular revision and is effective in the medium term. Further follow-up is required to assess the long-term results in the light of in vitro studies which have questioned the quality of the cement-in-cement bond.
We have studied the natural history of a first episode of dislocation after primary total hip replacement (THR) to clarify the incidence of recurrent dislocation, the need for subsequent revision and the quality of life of these patients. Over a six-year period, 99 patients (101 hips) presented with a first dislocation of a primary THR. A total of 61 hips (60.4%) had dislocated more than once. After a minimum follow-up of one year, seven patients had died. Of the remaining 94 hips (92 patients), 47 underwent a revision for instability and one awaits operation (51% in total). Of these, seven re-dislocated and four needed further surgery. The quality of life of the patients was studied using the Oxford Hip Score and the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire. A control group of patients who had not dislocated was also studied. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (1 to 20), the mean Oxford Hip Score was 26.7 (15 to 47) after one episode of dislocation, 27.2 (12 to 45) after recurrent dislocation, 34.5 (12 to 54) after successful revision surgery, 42 (29 to 55) after failed revision surgery and 17.4 (12 to 32) in the control group. The EuroQol-5 dimension questionnaire revealed more health problems in patients undergoing revision surgery.
The in-cement technique for revision hip arthroplasty involves retaining the original cement-bone interface. This has been proven to be a biomechanically stronger method than recementing after complete removal of the original cement mantle. This study reviewed a series of 54 consecutive revision hip arthroplasty procedures, using the in-cement technique, between November 1999 and November 2003. Clinical and radiological follow-up included functional assessment. There were 54 procedures performed in 51 patients, whose mean age at surgery was 70.3 years (45 to 85). A total of 42 were available at a mean follow-up of 29.2 months (6 to 51). There was no radiological evidence of loosening. Functional assessments were available for 40 patients who had a mean Harris hip score of 85.2 (51.9 to 98.5), a mean Oxford hip score of 19.6 (12 to 41), a mean UCLA activity profile score of 5.9 (3 to 8) and a mean SF-36 score of 78.0 (31.6 to 100). The in-cement technique provides consistent, high functional outcomes and should be considered in appropriately selected cases.
Implantation of allograft bone is an integral part of revision surgery of the hip. One major concern with its use is the risk of transmission of infective agents. There are a number of methods of processing allograft bone in order to reduce this risk. One method requires washing the tissue using pulsed irrigation immediately before implantation. We report the incidence of deep bacterial infection in 138 patients (144 revision hip arthroplasties) who had undergone implantation of allograft bone. The bone used was fresh-frozen, non-irradiated and pulse-washed with normal saline before implantation. The deep infection rate at a minimum follow-up of one year was 0.7%. This method of processing appears to be associated with a very low risk of allograft-related bacterial infection.
The period of post-operative treatment before surgical wounds
are completely closed remains a key window, during which one can
apply new technologies that can minimise complications. One such
technology is the use of negative pressure wound therapy to manage
and accelerate healing of the closed incisional wound (incisional
NPWT). We undertook a literature review of this emerging indication
to identify evidence within orthopaedic surgery and other surgical
disciplines. Literature that supports our current understanding
of the mechanisms of action was also reviewed in detail. Objectives
Methods
The October 2012 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: diagnosing the infected hip replacement; whether tranexamic acid has a low complication rate; the relationship between poor cementing technique and early failure of resurfacing; debridement and retention for the infected replacement; triple-tapered stems and bone mineral density; how early discharge can be bad for your sleep; an updated QFracture algorithm to predict the risk of an osteoporotic fracture; and local infiltration analgesia and total hip replacement.
Following the recall of modular neck hip stems
in July 2012, research into femoral modularity will intensify over
the next few years. This review aims to provide surgeons with an
up-to-date summary of the clinically relevant evidence. The development
of femoral modularity, and a classification system, is described.
The theoretical rationale for modularity is summarised and the clinical
outcomes are explored. The review also examines the clinically relevant problems
reported following the use of femoral stems with a modular neck. Joint replacement registries in the United Kingdom and Australia
have provided data on the failure rates of modular devices but cannot
identify the mechanism of failure. This information is needed to
determine whether modular neck femoral stems will be used in the
future, and how we should monitor patients who already have them implanted. Cite this article:
In Norway total joint replacement after hip dysplasia
is reported more commonly than in neighbouring countries, implying
a higher prevalence of the condition. We report on the prevalence
of radiological features associated with hip dysplasia in a population
of
2081 19-year-old Norwegians. The radiological measurements used
to define hip dysplasia were Wiberg’s centre-edge (CE) angle at
thresholds of <
20° and <
25°, femoral head extrusion index
<
75%, Sharp’s angle >
45°, an acetabular depth to width ratio
<
250 and the sourcil shape assessed subjectively. The whole
cohort underwent clinical examination of their range of hip movement,
body mass index (BMI), and Beighton hypermobility score, and were
asked to complete the EuroQol (EQ-5D) and Western Ontario and McMaster
Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The prevalence of hip
dysplasia in the cohort varied from 1.7% to 20% depending on the
radiological marker used. A Wiberg’s CE angle <
20° was seen
in 3.3% of the cohort: 4.3% in women and 2.4% in men. We found no
association between subjects with multiple radiological signs indicative
of dysplasia and BMI, Beighton score, EQ-5D or WOMAC. Although there
appears to be a high prevalence of hip dysplasia among 19-year-old
Norwegians, this is dependent on the radiological parameters applied. Cite this article:
We obtained pre-operative and six-month post-operative
Oxford hip (OHS) and knee scores (OKS) for 1523 patients who underwent
total hip replacement and 1784 patients who underwent total knee
replacement. They all also completed a six-month satisfaction question. Scatter plots showed no relationship between pre-operative Oxford
scores and six-month satisfaction scores. Spearman’s rank correlation
coefficients were -0.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.09 to 0.01)
between OHS and satisfaction and 0.04 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.08) between
OKS and satisfaction. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve
analysis was used to identify a cut-off point for the pre-operative
OHS/OKS that identifies whether or not a patient is satisfied with
surgery. We obtained an area under the ROC curve of 0.51 (95% CI
0.45 to 0.56) for hip replacement and 0.56 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.60)
for knee replacement, indicating that pre-operative Oxford scores
have no predictive accuracy in distinguishing satisfied from dissatisfied
patients. In the NHS widespread attempts are being made to use patient-reported
outcome measures (PROMs) data for the purpose of prioritising patients
for surgery. Oxford hip and knee scores have no predictive accuracy
in relation to post-operative patient satisfaction. This evidence
does not support their current use in prioritising access to care.
Patients with infected arthroplasties are normally
treated with a two-stage exchange procedure using polymethylmethacrylate
bone cement spacers impregnated with antibiotics. However, spacers
may act as a foreign body to which micro-organisms may adhere and
grow. In this study it was hypothesised that subclinical infection may
be diagnosed with sonication of the surface biofilm of the spacer.
The aims were to assess the presence of subclinical infection through
sonication of the spacer at the time of a second-stage procedure,
and to determine the relationship between subclinical infection
and the clinical outcome. Of 55 patients studied, 11 (20%) were
diagnosed with subclinical infection. At a mean follow-up of 12
months (interquartile range 6 to 18), clinical failure was found in
18 (32.7%) patients. Of the patients previously diagnosed with subclinical
infection, 63% (7 of 11) had failed compared with 25% (11 of 44)
of those without subclinical infection (odds ratio 5.25, 95% confidence
interval 1.29 to 21.4, p = 0.021). Sonication of the biofilm of
the surface of the spacer is useful in order to exclude subclinical infection
and therefore contributes to improving the outcome after two-stage
procedures.
We review the history and literature of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Resurfacing and the science behind it continues to evolve. Recent results, particularly from the national arthroplasty registers, have spread disquiet among both surgeons and patients. A hip resurfacing arthroplasty is not a total hip replacement, but should perhaps be seen as a means of delaying it. The time when hip resurfacing is offered to a patient may be different from that for a total hip replacement. The same logic can apply to the timing of revision surgery. Consequently, the comparison of resurfacing with total hip replacement may be a false one. Nevertheless, the need for innovative solutions for young arthroplasty patients is clear. Total hip replacement can be usefully delayed in many of these patients by the use of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.