The June 2013 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: whether allograft composite is superior to megaprosthesis in massive reconstruction; pain from glomus tumours; thromboembolism and orthopaedic malignancy; bone marrow aspirate and cavity lesions; metastasectomy in osteosarcoma; spinal giant cell tumour; post-atomic strike sarcoma; and superficial sarcomas and post-operative infection rates.
The August 2014 Trauma Roundup360 looks at: On-table CT for calcaneal fractures; timing of femoral fracture surgery and outcomes; salvage arthroplasty for failed internal fixation of the femoral neck; screw insertion in osteoporotic bone; fibular intramedullary nailing on the ascendant; posterior wall acetabular fractures not all that innocent; bugs, plating and resistance and improving outcomes in olecranon tension band wiring.
This study evaluates the long-term survival of
spinal implants after surgical site infection (SSI) and the risk
factors associated with treatment failure. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was carried out on 43 patients
who had undergone a posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation
between January 2006 and December 2008, and who consecutively developed
an acute deep surgical site infection. All were appropriately treated
by surgical debridement with a tailored antibiotic program based
on culture results for a minimum of eight weeks. A ‘terminal event’ or failure of treatment was defined as implant
removal or death related to the SSI. The mean follow-up was 26 months
(1.03 to 50.9). A total of ten patients (23.3%) had a terminal event.
The rate of survival after the first debridement was 90.7% (95%
confidence interval (CI) 82.95 to 98.24) at six months, 85.4% (95%
CI 74.64 to 96.18) at one year, and 73.2% (95% CI 58.70 to 87.78)
at two, three and four years. Four of nine patients required re-instrumentation
after implant removal, and two of the four had a recurrent infection
at the surgical site. There was one recurrence after implant removal
without re-instrumentation. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant risk of treatment
failure in patients who developed sepsis (hazard ratio (HR) 12.5
(95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6 to 59.9); p <
0.001) or who
had >
three fused segments (HR 4.5 (95% CI 1.25 to 24.05); p = 0.03).
Implant survival is seriously compromised even after properly treated
surgical site infection, but progressively decreases over the first
24 months. Cite this article:
The October 2012 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup360 looks at: magnetic growing rods and scoliosis correction; maintaining alignment after manipulation of a radial shaft fracture; Glaswegian children and swellings of obscure origin; long-term outcome of femoral derotation osteotomy in cerebral palsy; lower-leg fractures and compartment syndrome in children; fractures of the radial neck in children; management of the paediatric Monteggia fracture; and missing the dislocated hip in Western Australia.
Malpositioning of the trochanteric entry point
during the introduction of an intramedullary nail may cause iatrogenic
fracture or malreduction. Although the optimal point of insertion
in the coronal plane has been well described, positioning in the
sagittal plane is poorly defined. The paired femora from 374 cadavers were placed both in the anatomical
position and in internal rotation to neutralise femoral anteversion.
A marker was placed at the apparent apex of the greater trochanter,
and the lateral and anterior offsets from the axis of the femoral
shaft were measured on anteroposterior and lateral photographs. Greater
trochanteric morphology and trochanteric overhang were graded. The mean anterior offset of the apex of the trochanter relative
to the axis of the femoral shaft was 5.1 mm ( Placement of the entry position at the apex of the greater trochanter
in the anteroposterior view does not reliably centre an intramedullary
nail in the sagittal plane. Based on our findings, the site of insertion
should be about 5 mm posterior to the apex of the trochanter to
allow for its anterior offset. Cite this article:
We conducted a prospective follow-up MRI study
of originally asymptomatic healthy subjects to clarify the development
of Modic changes in the cervical spine over a ten-year period and
to identify related factors. Previously, 497 asymptomatic healthy
volunteers with no history of cervical trauma or surgery underwent
MRI. Of these, 223 underwent a second MRI at a mean follow-up of
11.6 years (10 to 12.7). These 223 subjects comprised 133 men and 100
women with a mean age at second MRI of 50.5 years (23 to 83). Modic
changes were classified as not present and types 1 to 3. Changes
in Modic types over time and relationships between Modic changes
and progression of degeneration of the disc or clinical symptoms
were evaluated. A total of 31 subjects (13.9%) showed Modic changes at
follow-up: type 1 in nine, type 2 in 18, type 3 in two, and types In the cervical spine over a ten-year period
A review of the current literature shows that there is a lack of consensus regarding the treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Most of the views and recommendations provided in various reports are weakly supported by evidence. There is a limited amount of information about the natural history of the condition, making it difficult to compare the effectiveness of various conservative and operative treatments. This systematic review summarises the current knowledge on spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis and attempts to present a rational approach to the evaluation and management of this condition in children and adolescents.
Spinal stenosis and disc herniation are the two
most frequent causes of lumbosacral nerve root compression. This
can result in muscle weakness and present with or without pain. The
difficulty when managing patients with these conditions is knowing
when surgery is better than non-operative treatment: the evidence
is controversial. Younger patients with a lesser degree of weakness
for a shorter period of time have been shown to respond better to surgical
treatment than older patients with greater weakness for longer.
However, they also constitute a group that fares better without
surgery. The main indication for surgical treatment in the management
of patients with lumbosacral nerve root compression should be pain
rather than weakness.
Osteoporosis is common and the health and financial
cost of fragility fractures is considerable. The burden of cardiovascular
disease has been reduced dramatically by identifying and targeting
those most at risk. A similar approach is potentially possible in
the context of fragility fractures. The World Health Organization
created and endorsed the use of FRAX, a fracture risk assessment
tool, which uses selected risk factors to calculate a quantitative,
patient-specific, ten-year risk of sustaining a fragility fracture.
Treatment can thus be based on this as well as on measured bone
mineral density. It may also be used to determine at-risk individuals,
who should undergo bone densitometry. FRAX has been incorporated
into the national osteoporosis guidelines of countries in the Americas,
Europe, the Far East and Australasia. The United Kingdom National
Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence also advocates its
use in their guidance on the assessment of the risk of fragility
fracture, and it may become an important tool to combat the health
challenges posed by fragility fractures.
The June 2014 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup360 looks at: plaster wedging in paediatric forearm fractures; the medial approach for DDH; Ponseti – but not as he knew it?; Salter osteotomy more accurate than Pemberton in DDH; is the open paediatric fracture an emergency?; bang up-to-date with femoral external fixation; indomethacin, heterotopic ossification and cerebral palsy hips; lengthening nails for congenital femoral deformities, and is MRI the answer to imaging of the physis?
Diastematomyelia is a rare congenital abnormality
of the spinal cord. This paper summarises more than 30 years’ experience
of treating this condition. Data were collected retrospectively
on 138 patients with diastematomyelia (34 males, 104 females) who
were treated at our hospital from May 1978 to April 2010. A total
of 106 patients had double dural
Scapulothoracic fusion (STF) for painful winging
of the scapula in neuromuscular disorders can provide effective pain
relief and functional improvement, but there is little information
comparing outcomes between patients with dystrophic and non-dystrophic
conditions. We performed a retrospective review of 42 STFs in 34
patients with dystrophic and non-dystrophic conditions using a multifilament
trans-scapular, subcostal cable technique supported by a dorsal
one-third semi-tubular plate. There were 16 males and 18 females
with a mean age of 30 years (15 to 75) and a mean follow-up of 5.0
years (2.0 to 10.6). The mean Oxford shoulder score improved from
20 (4 to 39) to 31 (4 to 48). Patients with non-dystrophic conditions
had lower overall functional scores but achieved greater improvements
following STF. The mean active forward elevation increased from
59° (20° to 90°) to 97° (30° to 150°), and abduction from 51° (10°
to 90°) to 83° (30° to 130°) with a greater range of movement achieved
in the dystrophic group. Revision fusion for nonunion was undertaken
in five patients at a mean time of 17 months (7 to 31) and two required
revision for fracture. There were three pneumothoraces, two rib
fractures, three pleural effusions and six nonunions. The main risk
factors for nonunion were smoking, age and previous shoulder girdle surgery. STF is a salvage procedure that can provide good patient satisfaction
in 82% of patients with both dystrophic and non-dystrophic pathologies,
but there was a relatively high failure rate (26%) when poor outcomes
were analysed. Overall function was better in patients with dystrophic
conditions which correlated with better range of movement; however,
patients with non-dystrophic conditions achieved greater functional
improvement.
The April 2014 Research Roundup360 looks at: scientific writing needed in orthopaedic papers; antiseptics and osteoblasts; thromboembolic management in orthopaedic patients; nicotine and obesity in post-operative complications; defining the “Patient Acceptable Symptom State”; and cheap and nasty implants of poor quality.
The identification of the extent of neural damage
in patients with acute or chronic spinal cord injury is imperative for
the accurate prediction of neurological recovery. The changes in
signal intensity shown on routine MRI sequences are of limited value
for predicting functional outcome. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)
is a novel radiological imaging technique which has the potential
to identify intact nerve fibre tracts, and has been used to image
the brain for a variety of conditions. DTI imaging of the spinal
cord is currently only a research tool, but preliminary studies
have shown that it holds considerable promise in predicting the
severity of spinal cord injury. This paper briefly reviews our current knowledge of this technique.
Ancient Egypt was a highly developed agrarian society with a massive civil engineering capability. Trauma and skeletal disease were common and vestiges of the evidence for that survive, largely in the form of hieratic images and papyri dedicated to the practice of medicine. The earliest treatise on trauma is the
The April 2014 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup360 looks at: urgent supracondylar fractures; rotational osteotomy for synostosis; predicting slip in paediatric forearm fractures; progressive lengthening of the digit is possible; treatment of SUFE with the Dunn osteotomy; and the best way to apply the eight-plate?.
We present a review of claims made to the NHS
Litigation Authority (NHSLA) by patients with conditions affecting the
shoulder and elbow, and identify areas of dissatisfaction and potential
improvement. Between 1995 and 2012, the NHSLA recorded 811 claims
related to the shoulder and elbow, 581 of which were settled. This
comprised 364 shoulder (64%), and 217 elbow (36%) claims. A total
of £18.2 million was paid out in settled claims. Overall diagnosis,
mismanagement and intra-operative nerve injury were the most common
reasons for litigation. The highest cost paid out resulted from
claims dealing with incorrect, missed or delayed diagnosis, with
just under £6 million paid out overall. Fractures and dislocations
around the shoulder and elbow were common injuries in this category.
All 11 claims following wrong-site surgery that were settled led
to successful payouts. This study highlights the diagnoses and procedures that need
to be treated with particular vigilance. Having an awareness of
the areas that lead to litigation in shoulder and elbow surgery
will help to reduce inadvertent risks to patients and prevent dissatisfaction
and possible litigation. Cite this article: