Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical and quality-of-life outcomes of children with skeletal dysplasia to those in children with idiopathic early-onset scoliosis (EOS) undergoing growth-friendly management. Patients and Methods. A retrospective review of two prospective multicentre EOS databases identified 33 children with skeletal dysplasia and EOS (major curve ≥ 30°) who were treated with growth-friendly instrumentation at younger than ten years of age, had a minimum two years of postoperative follow-up, and had undergone three or more lengthening procedures. From the same registries, 33 matched controls with idiopathic EOS were identified. A total of 20 children in both groups were treated with growing rods and 13 children were treated with vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) instrumentation. Results. Mean preoperative major curves were 76° (34° to 115°) in the skeletal dysplasia group and 75° (51° to 113°) in the idiopathic group (p = 0.55), which were corrected at final follow-up to 49° (13° to 113°) and 46° (12° to 112°; p = 0.68), respectively. T1-S1 height increased by a mean of 36 mm (0 to 105) in the skeletal dysplasia group and 38 mm (7 to 104) in the idiopathic group at the index surgery (p = 0.40), and by 21 mm (1 to 68) and 46 mm (7 to 157), respectively, during the distraction period (p = 0.0085). The skeletal dysplasia group had significantly worse scores in the physical function, daily living, financial impact, and parent satisfaction preoperatively, as well as on financial impact and child satisfaction at final follow-up, than the idiopathic group (all p < 0.05). The domains of the 24-Item Early-Onset
Aims. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and analyze the trends of surgeon-reported complications following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) over a 13-year period from the
Aims. Patients may present with concurrent symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine, with surgical treatment being indicated for both. Whether arthroplasty of the hip or spinal surgery should be performed first remains uncertain. Materials and Methods. Clinical scenarios were devised for a survey asking the preferred order of surgery and the rationale for this decision for five fictional patients with both OA of the hip and degenerative lumbar disorders. These were symptomatic OA of the hip and: 1) lumbar spinal stenosis with neurological claudication; 2) lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with leg pain; 3) lumbar disc herniation with leg weakness; 4) lumbar scoliosis with back pain; and 5) thoracolumbar disc herniation with myelopathy. This survey was sent to 110 members of The Hip Society and 101 members of the
Aims. There is little information about the optimum number of implants
to be used in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Retrospective
analysis of prospectively collected data from the Swedish spine
register was undertaken to discover whether more implants per operated
vertebra (implant density) leads to a better outcome in the treatment of
idiopathic scoliosis. The hypothesis was that implant density is
not associated with patient-reported outcomes, the correction of
the curve or the rate of reoperation. Patients and Methods. A total of 328 patients with idiopathic scoliosis, aged between
ten and 20 years at the time of surgery, were identified in the
Swedish spine register (Swespine) and had patient reported outcomes
including the
Aims. The aims of our study were to provide long-term information on
the behaviour of the thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve after thoracic
anterior correction and fusion (ASF) and to determine the impact
of ASF on pulmonary function. Patients and Methods. A total of 41 patients (four males, 37 females) with main thoracic
(MT) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with ASF were
included. Mean age at surgery was 15.2 years (11 to 27). Mean follow-up
period was 13.5 years (10 to 18). Results. For the TL/L curve, the mean curve flexibility evaluated with
supine pre-operative bending radiographs was 78.6% (standard deviation
16.5%), with no significant loss of correction observed. On comparing
patients with an increase of the TL/L curve increase (>
4º, n =
9, 22%) to those without, significant differences were observed
in the correction rate of the MT curve at the final follow-up (p
= 0.011), correction loss of the MT curve (p = 0.003) and the proportion of
patients who had semi-rigid instrumentation (p = 0.003). Pre-operative
percentage predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) was 80%, dropping
to 72% at final follow-up (p <
0.001). The
Aims. A total of 30 patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic
scoliosis (AIS) treated between 1989 and 2000 with anterior correction
and fusion surgery using dual-rod instrumentation were reviewed. . Patients and Methods. Radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were compared among
patients with lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) at the lower end
vertebra (LEV; EV group) (n = 13) and those treated by short fusion
(S group), with LIV one level proximal to EV (n = 17 patients). . Results. The allocation of the surgical technique was determined by the
flexibility of the TL/L curves and/or neutral vertebrae located
one level above LEV as determined on preoperative radiographs. If
these requirements were met a short fusion was performed. The mean
follow-up period was 21.4 years (16 to 27). The mean correction
rate at final follow-up was significantly lower in the S group (74 . sd. 11%)
than in the EV group (88 . sd. 13%) (p = 0.004).Coronal and
sagittal balance, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and clinical
outcomes evaluated by the
We reviewed 212 consecutive patients with adolescent
idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis
using all pedicle screw instrumentation in terms of clinical, radiological
and
Aims. The aim of this study is to introduce and investigate the efficacy
and feasibility of a new vertebral osteotomy technique, vertebral
column decancellation (VCD), for rigid thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity
(TLKD) secondary to ankylosing spondylitis (AS). . Patients and Methods. We took 39 patients from between January 2009 and January 2013
(26 male, 13 female, mean age 37.4 years, 28 to 54) with AS and
a TLKD who underwent VCD (VCD group) and compared their outcome
with 45 patients (31 male, 14 female, mean age 34.8 years, 23 to
47) with AS and TLKD, who underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy
(PSO group), according to the same selection criteria. The technique
of VCD was performed at single vertebral level in the thoracolumbar
region of AS patients according to classification of AS kyphotic
deformity. Pre- and post-operative chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA),
sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and sagittal Cobb angle in the thoracolumbar
region were reviewed in the VCD and PSO groups. Intra- , post-operative
and general complications were analysed in both group. Results. lf patients could lie on their backs and walk with horizontal
vision and sagittal profile, radiographic parameters improved significantly
post-operatively in both groups. No major acute complications such
as death or complete paralysis occurred in either group. In the
VCD group, five patients (12.8%) experienced complications such
as severe CSF leak (n = 4), deep wound infection (n = 1) and in
one patient a transient neurological deficit occurred. In the PSO group,
eight patients (17.8%) suffered conditions such as severe CSF leak
(n = 5), infections (n = 2) and sagittal translation at osteotomy
site (n = 1).
The December 2022 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup360 looks at: Immobilization of torus fractures of the wrist in children (FORCE): a randomized controlled equivalence trial in the UK; Minimally invasive method in treatment of idiopathic congenital vertical talus: recurrence is uncommon; “You’re O.K. Anaesthesia”: closed reduction of displaced paediatric forearm and wrist fractures in the office without anaesthesia; Trunk range of motion and patient outcomes after anterior vertebral body tethering versus posterior spinal fusion: comparison using computerized 3D motion capture technology; Selective dorsal rhizotomy for individuals with spastic cerebral palsy; Scheuermann’s kyphosis and posterior spinal fusion; All-pedicle-screw constructs in skeletally immature patients with severe idiopathic early-onset scoliosis; Proximal femoral screw hemiepiphysiodesis in children with cerebral palsy.
To systematically evaluate whether bracing can effectively achieve curve regression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and to identify any predictors of curve regression after bracing. Two independent reviewers performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library to obtain all published information about the effectiveness of bracing in achieving curve regression in AIS patients. Search terms included “brace treatment” or “bracing,” “idiopathic scoliosis,” and “curve regression” or “curve reduction.” Inclusion criteria were studies recruiting patients with AIS undergoing brace treatment and one of the study outcomes must be curve regression or reduction, defined as > 5° reduction in coronal Cobb angle of a major curve upon bracing completion. Exclusion criteria were studies including non-AIS patients, studies not reporting p-value or confidence interval, animal studies, case reports, case series, and systematic reviews. The GRADE approach to assessing quality of evidence was used to evaluate each publication.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after growth-friendly treatment for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) between patients with skeletal dysplasias versus those with other syndromes. We retrospectively identified 20 patients with skeletal dysplasias and 292 with other syndromes (control group) who had completed surgical growth-friendly EOS treatment between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2018. We compared radiological parameters, complications, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at mean follow-up of 8.6 years (SD 3.3) in the dysplasia group and 6.6 years (SD 2.6) in the control group.Aims
Methods
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), defined by an age at presentation of 11 to 18 years, has a prevalence of 0.47% and accounts for approximately 90% of all cases of idiopathic scoliosis. Despite decades of research, the exact aetiology of AIS remains unknown. It is becoming evident that it is the result of a complex interplay of genetic, internal, and environmental factors. It has been hypothesized that genetic variants act as the initial trigger that allow epigenetic factors to propagate AIS, which could also explain the wide phenotypic variation in the presentation of the disorder. A better understanding of the underlying aetiological mechanisms could help to establish the diagnosis earlier and allow a more accurate prediction of deformity progression. This, in turn, would prompt imaging and therapeutic intervention at the appropriate time, thereby achieving the best clinical outcome for this group of patients. Cite this article: