The June 2015 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: neuraxial anaesthesia and large joint arthroplasty; revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery; acetabular version and clinical outcomes in impingement surgery; hip precautions may be ineffective; implant selection and cost effectiveness; femoroacetabular impingement in the older age group; multiple revision in hip arthroplasty
The cam-type deformity in femoroacetabular impingement
is a 3D deformity. Single measurements using radiographs, CT or
MRI may not provide a true estimate of the magnitude of the deformity.
We performed an analysis of the size and location of measurements
of the alpha angle (α°) using a CT technique which could be applied
to the 3D reconstructions of the hip. Analysis was undertaken in
42 patients (57 hips; 24 men and 18 women; mean age 38 years (16
to 58)) who had symptoms of femoroacetabular impingement related
to a cam-type abnormality. An α° of >
50° was considered a significant
indicator of cam-type impingement. Measurements of the α° were made
at different points around the femoral head/neck junction at intervals
of 30°: starting at the nine o’clock (posterior), ten, eleven and
twelve o’clock (superior), one, two and ending at three o’clock
(anterior) position. The mean maximum increased α° was 64.6° (50.8° to 86°). The two
o’clock position was the most common point to find an increased α°
(53 hips; 93%), followed by one o’clock (48 hips; 84%). The largest α°
for each hip was found most frequently at the two o’clock position
(46%), followed by the one o’clock position (39%). Generally, raised α angles
extend over three segments of the clock face. Single measurements of the α°, whether pre- or post-operative,
should be viewed with caution as they may not be representative
of the true size of the deformity and not define whether adequate
correction has been achieved following surgery. Cite this article:
Controversy remains whether the contralateral
hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital
femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This retrospective study compares the
outcomes and cost of those patients who had prophylactic fixation
with those who did not. Between January 2000 and December 2010 a total of 50 patients
underwent unilateral fixation and 36 had prophylactic fixation of
the contralateral hip. There were 54 males and 32 females with a
mean age of 12.3 years (9 to 16). The rate of a subsequent slip
without prophylactic fixation was 46%. The risk of complications
was greater, the generic health measures (Short Form-12 physical
(p <
0.001) and mental (p = 0.004) summary scores) were worse.
Radiographic cam lesions in patients presenting with unilateral
SCFE were only seen in patients who did not have prophylactic fixation.
Furthermore, prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip was
found to be a cost-effective procedure, with a cost per quality
adjusted life year gained of £1431 at the time of last follow-up. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip is a cost-effective
operation that limits the morbidity from the complications of a
further slip, and the diminished functional outcome associated with
unilateral fixation. Cite this article:
The use of joint-preserving surgery of the hip
has been largely abandoned since the introduction of total hip replacement.
However, with the modification of such techniques as pelvic osteotomy,
and the introduction of intracapsular procedures such as surgical
hip dislocation and arthroscopy, previously unexpected options for
the surgical treatment of sequelae of childhood conditions, including
developmental dysplasia of the hip, slipped upper femoral epiphysis
and Perthes’ disease, have become available. Moreover, femoroacetabular
impingement has been identified as a significant aetiological factor
in the development of osteoarthritis in many hips previously considered to
suffer from primary osteoarthritis. As mechanical causes of degenerative joint disease are now recognised
earlier in the disease process, these techniques may be used to
decelerate or even prevent progression to osteoarthritis. We review
the recent development of these concepts and the associated surgical
techniques. Cite this article:
Joint-preserving surgery of the hip (JPSH) has evolved considerably
and now includes a number of procedures, including arthroscopy,
surgical dislocation, and redirectional osteotomies of the femur
and acetabulum. There are a number of different factors which lead
to failure of JPSH. Consequently, it is of interest to assess the
various modes of failure in order to continue to identify best practice
and the indications for these procedures. Using a retrospective observational study design, we reviewed
1013 patients who had undergone JPSH by a single surgeon between
2005 and 2015. There were 509 men and 504 women with a mean age
of 39 years (16 to 78). Of the 1013 operations, 783 were arthroscopies,
122 surgical dislocations, and 108 peri-acetabular osteotomies (PAO).
We analysed the overall failure rates and modes of failure. Re-operations
were categorised into four groups: Mode 1 was arthritis progression
or organ failure leading to total hip arthroplasty (THA); Mode 2
was an Incorrect diagnosis/procedure; Mode 3 resulted from malcorrection
of femur (type A), acetabulum (type B), or labrum (type C) and Mode 4
resulted from an unintended consequence of the initial surgical
intervention.Aims
Patients and Methods
We undertook a retrospective comparative study
of all patients with an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis presenting
to a single centre between 1998 and 2011. There were 45 patients
(46 hips; mean age 12.6 years; 9 to 14); 16 hips underwent intracapsular
cuneiform osteotomy and 30 underwent pinning Pinning Non-emergency intracapsular osteotomy may have a protective effect
on the epiphyseal vasculature and should be undertaken with a delay
of at least two weeks. The place of emergency pinning Cite this article:
Acetabular labral tears and associated intra-articular
pathology of the hip have been recognised as a source of symptoms.
However, it is now appreciated that there is a relatively high prevalence
of asymptomatic labral tears. In this study, 70 young asymptomatic
adult volunteers with a mean age of 26 years (19 to 41) were recruited
and underwent three tesla non-arthrographic MR scans. There were
47 women (67.1%) and 23 men (32.9%). Labral tears were found in 27 volunteers (38.6%); these were
an isolated finding in 16 (22.9%) and were associated with other
intra-articular pathology in the remaining 11 (15.7%) volunteers.
Furthermore, five (7.1%) had intra-articular pathology without an
associated labral tear. Given the high prevalence of labral pathology in the asymptomatic
population, it is important to confirm that a patient's symptoms
are due to the demonstrated abnormalities when considering surgery. Cite this article:
We have reviewed the current literature to compare
the results of surgery aimed to repair or debride a damaged acetabular
labrum. We identified 28 studies to be included in the review containing
a total of 1631 hips in 1609 patients. Of these studies 12 reported
a mean rate of good results of 82% (from 67% to 100%) for labral debridement.
Of the 16 studies that reported a combination of debridement and
re-attachment, five reported a comparative outcome for the two methods,
four reported better results with re-attachment and one study did
not find any significant difference in outcomes. Due to the heterogeneity
of the studies it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis or
draw accurate conclusions. Confounding factors in the studies include
selection bias, use of historical controls and high rates of loss
of follow-up. It seems logical to repair an unstable tear in a good quality
labrum with good potential to heal in order potentially to preserve
its physiological function. A degenerative labrum on the other hand
may be the source of discomfort and its preservation may result
in persistent pain and the added risk of failure of re-attachment.
The results of the present study do not support routine refixation
for all labral tears. Cite this article:
Our understanding of the origin of hip pain in
degenerative disorders of the hip, including primary osteoarthritis, avascular
necrosis and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), is limited. We
undertook a histological investigation of the nociceptive innervation
of the acetabular labrum, ligamentum teres and capsule of the hip,
in order to prove pain- and proprioceptive-associated marker expression.
These structures were isolated from 57 patients who had undergone
elective hip surgery (44 labral samples, 33 ligamentum teres specimens,
34 capsular samples; in 19 patients all three structures were harvested).
A total of
15 000 histological sections were prepared that were investigated
immunohistochemically for the presence of protein S-100, 68 kDa
neurofilament, neuropeptide Y, nociceptin and substance P. The tissues
were evaluated in six representative areas. Within the labrum, pain-associated free nerve ending expression
was located predominantly at its base, decreasing in the periphery.
In contrast, the distribution within the ligamentum teres showed
a high local concentration in the centre. The hip capsule had an
almost homogeneous marker expression in all investigated areas. This study showed characteristic distribution profiles of nociceptive
and pain-related nerve fibres, which may help in understanding the
origin of hip pain. Cite this article:
The acetabular labrum is a soft-tissue structure
which lines the acetabular rim of the hip joint. Its role in hip
joint biomechanics and joint health has been of particular interest
over the past decade. In normal hip joint biomechanics, the labrum
is crucial in retaining a layer of pressurised intra-articular fluid
for joint lubrication and load support/distribution. Its seal around
the femoral head is further regarded as a contributing to hip stability through
its suction effect. The labrum itself is also important in increasing
contact area thereby reducing contact stress. Given the labrum’s
role in normal hip joint biomechanics, surgical techniques for managing
labral damage are continuously evolving as our understanding of
its anatomy and function continue to progress. The current paper
aims to review the anatomy and biomechanical function of the labrum
and how they are affected by differing surgical techniques. Take home message: The acetabular labrum plays a critical role
in hip function and maintaining and restoring its function during
surgical intervention remain an essential goal. Cite this article:
The October 2013 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Young and impinging; Clothes, weather and femoral heads?; Go long, go cemented; Surgical repair of the abductors?; Aspirin for DVT prophylaxis?; Ceramic-on-polyethylene: a low-wear solution?; ALVAL and ASR™: the story continues….; Salvaging Legg-Calve-Perthes’ disease
We report on gender-specific reference intervals
of the alpha angle and its association with other qualitative cam-type
findings in femoroacetabular impingement at the hip, according to
a population-based cohort of 2038 19-year-olds, 1186 of which were
women (58%). The alpha angle was measured on standardised frog-leg
lateral and anteroposterior (AP) views using digital measurement
software, and qualitative cam-type findings were assessed subjectively
on both views by independent observers. In all, 2005 participants
(837 men, 1168 women, mean age 18.6 years (17.2 to 20.1) were included
in the analysis. For the frog-leg view, the mean alpha angle (right
hip) was 47° (26 to 79) in men and 42° (29 to 76) in women, with
97.5 percentiles of 68° and 56°, respectively. For the AP view,
the mean values were 62° (40 to 105) and 52° (36 to 103) for men
and women, respectively, with 97.5 percentiles of 93° and 94°. Associations
between higher alpha angles and all qualitative cam-type findings
were seen for both genders on both views. The reference intervals
presented for the alpha angle in this cross-sectional study are
wide, especially for the AP view, with higher mean values for men
than women on both views. Cite this article:
We performed a retrospective examination of the
anteroposterior pelvic CT scout views of 419 randomly selected patients between
April 2004 and August 2009 in order to determine the prevalence
of cam-type femoroacetabular deformity in the asymptomatic population.
The CT scans had all been undertaken for conditions unrelated to
disorders of the hip. The frequency of cam-type femoroacetabular
deformity was assessed by measuring the α-angle of each hip on the
anteroposterior images. The α-angles were classified according to
the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Among 215 male hips (108 patients)
the mean α-angle was 59.12° (37.75° to 103.50°). Of these, a total
of 30 hips (13.95%) were defined as pathological, 32 (14.88%) as
borderline and 153 (71.16%) as normal. Among 540 female hips (272
patients) the mean α-angle was 45.47° (34.75° to 87.00°), with 30
hips (5.56%) defined as pathological, 33 (6.11%) as borderline and
477 (88.33%) as normal. It appears that the cam-type femoroacetabular
deformity is not rare among the asymptomatic population. These anatomical
abnormalities, as determined by an increased α-angle, appear to
be twice as frequent in men as in women. Although an association
between osteoarthritis and femoroacetabular impingement is believed
to exist, a long-term epidemiological study is needed to determine
the natural history of these anatomical abnormalities.
We retrospectively examined the long-term outcome of 96 asymptomatic hips in 96 patients with a mean age of 49.3 years (16 to 65) who had radiological evidence of femoroacetabular impingement. When surveillance commenced there were 17, 34, and 45 hips with cam, pincer, and mixed impingement, respectively. Overall, 79 hips (82.3%) remained free of osteoarthritis for a mean of 18.5 years (10 to 40). In contrast, 17 hips (17.7%) developed osteoarthritis at a mean of 12 years (2 to 28). No statistically significant difference was found in the rates of development of osteoarthritis among the three groups (p = 0.43). Regression analysis showed that only the presence of idiopathic osteoarthritis of the contralateral diseased hip was predictive of development of osteoarthritis on the asymptomatic side (p = 0.039). We conclude that a substantial proportion of hips with femoroacetabular impingement may not develop osteoarthritis in the long-term. Accordingly, in the absence of symptoms, prophylactic surgical treatment is not warranted.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical
and radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Interlocking Pelvic
Osteotomy (BIPO). In this prospective study, we report the mid- to long-term clinical
outcomes of the first 100 consecutive patients (116 hips; 88 in
women, 28 in men) undergoing BIPO, reflecting the surgeon’s learning
curve. Failure was defined as conversion to hip arthroplasty. The
mean age at operation was 31 years (7 to 57). Three patients (three
hips) were lost to follow-up.Aims
Patients and Methods
The β-angle is a radiological tool for measuring the distance between the pathological head-neck junction and the acetabular rim with the hip in 90° of flexion in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Initially it was measured using an open-chamber MRI. We have developed a technique to measure this angle on plain radiographs. Correlation analysis was undertaken to determine the relationship between the range of movement and the β-angle in 50 patients with femoroacetabular impingement and 50 asymptomatic control subjects. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the β-angle was also evaluated. Patients with femoroacetabular impingement had a significantly smaller (p <
0.001) mean β-angle (15.6°, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.3 to 17.7) compared with the asymptomatic group (38.7°, 95% CI 36.5 to 41.0). Correlation between internal rotation and the β-angle was high in the impingement group and moderate in the asymptomatic group. The β-angle had excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability in both groups. Our findings suggest that the measurement of the β-angle on plain radiography may represent a valid, reproducible and cost-effective alternative to open MRI in the assessment of the pathological bony anatomy in patients with cam, pincer and mixed femoroacetabular impingement.