The type II Monteggia (posterior) lesion is a rare injury which is sometimes associated with ulnohumeral instability. We have reviewed 23 of 28 patients with this injury. A clinical and radiographic assessment was undertaken at follow-up. Functional outcome scores, including the Broberg and Morrey Index and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder or Hand (DASH), were used. The results from the six patients with associated posterior ulnohumeral dislocation were compared with 17 without ulnohumeral injury. Those with dislocation had reduced movement of the elbow and had outcome scores indicative of greater disability compared to those without associated dislocation

We describe 11 cases of posterior fracture-dislocation of the shoulder that required open reduction and fixation. Difficulties with access through anterior approaches led us to use the superior subacromial approach. This is an extension of the approach often used to expose the rotator cuff; the joint is opened by splitting the supraspinatus tendon 5 mm behind the cuff interval. The glenoid, proximal humerus and any fracture fragments can be seen from above, allowing reduction of the dislocation and osteosynthesis to be performed with minimal risk of damage to the humeral head and its blood supply. The proximity of the axillary nerve limits the exposure of the proximal humeral shaft. The superior subacromial approach is ideal for posterior dislocation with fracture of the articular segment, but is not suitable when there is a fracture of the proximal humeral shaft

Of 54 patients with posterior dislocations of the hip of type I and type II (Stewart and Milford 1954), 47 were followed for a mean period of 6.7 years (2 to 11). Of these, 23 had dislocation with minimal lesions of the acetabulum (type I) and 24 had an avulsed dorsocranial fragment (type II). All were reduced by closed methods within six hours. The subsequent treatment of type I dislocations was conservative. At the beginning of the period type II injuries were treated conservatively, but surgery was increasingly chosen for later cases. Type I dislocations had significantly better results (p < 0.05) than type II fracture-dislocations, regardless of the method of treatment. There were no essential differences between the results of surgical and conservative treatment in type II dislocations

We report seven cases in which open or closed reduction of a shoulder dislocation associated with a fracture of the humeral neck led to displacement of the neck fracture. Avascular necrosis of the humeral head developed in all six patients with anatomical neck fractures. All five anterior dislocations also had a fracture of the greater tuberosity and both posterior dislocations had a fracture of the lesser tuberosity. The neck fracture had not initially been recognised in three of the seven cases. In five cases attempted shoulder reduction led to complete displacement of the head segment, which was treated by open reduction and minimal internal fixation. In the other two cases, shoulder reduction caused only mild to moderate displacement which was accepted and the fracture was treated conservatively. We conclude that biplane radiography is essential before reduction of a shoulder dislocation. Neck fractures must always be ruled out, especially where there are tuberosity fractures. In our series, careful closed reduction under general anaesthesia with optimal relaxation and fluoroscopic control did not prevent iatrogenic displacement. Prophylactic stabilisation of the neck fracture should be considered before reduction of such a fracture-dislocation. It may be, however, that the prevention of displacement by prophylactic stabilisation does not always prevent late avascular necrosis; we observed this in one case

1. A study of 2,200 patients receiving electro-convulsive therapy showed that fifty-three sustained fractures or dislocations—an incidence of 2·4 per cent. Of the fifty-three injuries, twenty-one occurred in the spine, fifteen in the neck of femur, fifteen in the upper end of humerus, one in the coracoid process; one dislocated jaw required anaesthesia for its reduction (other cases of transient dislocation of the jaw are excluded). 2. The incidence, site, and type of spinal fractures are recorded, and the relation of the fracture to the first convulsion is noted. No late changes were found in the spines of patients examined two years or more after treatment. A neutral position of the spine during the convulsion is believed to diminish the risk of fracture. 3. Fracture of the neck of the femur is a serious injury in these patients. In one case the injury was bilateral. 4. The fifteen cases of fracture-dislocation of the upper humerus are analysed. They included two cases of posterior dislocation of the humeral head; the possible mechanism of this is explained and a method of prevention suggested. 5. Fifty-three patients with chronic epilepsy with psychosis were examined. Four cases of fractured spine were discovered. The site of fracture was different from that of fractures caused by convulsive therapy and a reason for this is suggested. The type and mechanism of the fracture are similar in the two groups

1. One hundred patients with dislocation of the hip joint have been reviewed, many having been re-examined at intervals ranging from two to five years after injury. 2. There were forty-six simple dislocations, forty-three dislocations with fracture of the acetabular rim, seven dislocations with fracture of the acetabular floor, and five dislocations with fracture of the femoral head. 3. Complete recovery, as judged by clinical and radiographic examination, was observed in 76 per cent. of simple dislocations, 63 per cent. of dislocations with fracture of the acetabular rim, and 40 per cent. of dislocations with fracture of the femoral head; in no case of dislocation with fracture of the acetabular floor was recovery complete. 4. Only in one case did myositis ossificans develop, and that was the only case treated by "massage and movements" throughout the first ten weeks after injury. 5. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head was recognised in a smaller proportion of patients than had been expected, but since the follow-up review extended only to four years after injury the results, in this respect, are unreliable. The incidence of this complication after injury to the hip joint cannot be assessed unless the follow-up period is at least five to ten years. 6. Early traumatic arthritis developed in 26 per cent. of patients—in 15 per cent. of simple dislocations, 25 per cent. of dislocations with fracture of the acetabular margin, 60 per cent. of dislocations with fracture of the femoral head, and 100 per cent. of dislocations with fracture of the acetabular floor. 7. When central or posterior dislocations are accompanied by fracture of the acetabular floor, early arthrodesis is the treatment of choice. 8. Displacement of marginal acetabular fragments is usually corrected by manipulative reduction or by traction. 9. Sciatic paralysis in dislocation of the hip joint is nearly always due to damage of the nerve by a displaced acetabular fragment. In such cases, if the fragment is not replaced accurately by manipulation or traction, operative reduction is urgently indicated

Aims

To report mid- to long-term results of Oxford mobile bearing domed lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and determine the effect of potential contraindications on outcome.

Aims

The complex relationship between acetabular component position and spinopelvic mobility in patients following total hip arthroplasty (THA) renders it difficult to optimize acetabular component positioning. Mobility of the normal lumbar spine during postural changes results in alterations in pelvic tilt (PT) to maintain the sagittal balance in each posture and, as a consequence, markedly changes the functional component anteversion (FCA). This study aimed to investigate the in vivo association of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) with the PT angle and with FCA during postural changes in THA patients.

Aims

There is evidence that prior lumbar fusion increases the risk of dislocation and revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The relationship between prior lumbar fusion and the effect of femoral head diameter on THA dislocation has not been investigated. We examined the relationship between prior lumbar fusion or discectomy and the risk of dislocation or revision after THA. We also examined the effect of femoral head component diameter on the risk of dislocation or revision.

Aims

Patients with abnormal spinopelvic mobility are at increased risk for instability. Measuring the change in sacral slope (ΔSS) can help determine spinopelvic mobility preoperatively. Sacral slope (SS) should decrease at least 10° to demonstrate adequate posterior pelvic tilt. There is potential for different ΔSS measurements in the same patient based on sitting posture. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of sitting posture on the ΔSS in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Aims

To evaluate the rate of dislocation following dual mobility total hip arthroplasty (DM-THA) in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures, and to compare rates of dislocation, surgical-site infection, reoperation, and one-year mortality between DM-THA and bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA).

Aims

While previously underappreciated, factors related to the spine contribute substantially to the risk of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). These factors must be taken into consideration during preoperative planning for revision THA due to recurrent instability. We developed a protocol to assess the functional position of the spine, the significance of these findings, and how to address different pathologies at the time of revision THA.

There remains confusion in the literature with regard to the spinopelvic relationship, and its contribution to ideal acetabular component position. Critical assessment of the literature has been limited by use of conflicting terminology and definitions of new concepts that further confuse the topic. In 2017, the concept of a Hip-Spine Workgroup was created with the first meeting held at the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Annual Meeting in 2018. The goal of this workgroup was to first help standardize terminology across the literature so that as a topic, multiple groups could produce literature that is immediately understandable and applicable. This consensus review from the Hip-Spine Workgroup aims to simplify the spinopelvic relationship, offer hip surgeons a concise summary of available literature, and select common terminology approved by both hip surgeons and spine surgeons for future research.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:808–816.

Aims

The hip’s capsular ligaments passively restrain extreme range of movement (ROM) by wrapping around the native femoral head/neck. We determined the effect of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty (DM-THA), conventional THA, and surgical approach on ligament function.

Aims

To describe and analyze the mid-term functional outcomes of a large series of patients who underwent the Hoffer procedure for brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP).

Aims

Instability continues to be a troublesome complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patient-related risk factors associated with a higher dislocation risk include the preoperative diagnosis, an age of 75 years or older, high body mass index (BMI), a history of alcohol abuse, and neurodegenerative diseases. The goal of this study was to assess the dislocation rate, radiographic outcomes, and complications of patients stratified as high-risk for dislocation who received a dual mobility (DM) bearing in a primary THA at a minimum follow-up of two years.