In order to prevent dislocation of the hip after total hip arthroplasty
(THA), patients have to adhere to precautions in the early post-operative
period. The hypothesis of this study was that a protocol with minimal
precautions after primary THA using the posterolateral approach
would not increase the short-term (less than three months) risk
of dislocation. We prospectively monitored a group of unselected patients undergoing
primary THA managed with standard precautions (n = 109, median age
68.9 years; interquartile range (IQR) 61.2 to 77.3) and a group
who were managed with fewer precautions (n = 108, median age 67.2
years; IQR 59.8 to 73.2). There were no significant differences between
the groups in relation to predisposing risk factors. The diameter
of the femoral head ranged from 28 mm to 36 mm; meticulous soft-tissue
repair was undertaken in all patients. The medical records were
reviewed and all patients were contacted three months post-operatively
to confirm whether they had experienced a dislocation. Aims
Patients and Methods
The August 2015 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: The well-fixed acetabular revision; Predicting complications in revision arthroplasty; Is infection associated with fixation?; Front or back? An enduring question in hip surgery; Muscle-sparing approaches?; Gabapentin as a post-operative analgesic adjunct; An Indian take on AVN of the hip; Weight loss and arthroplasty
Surgical interventions consisting of internal
fixation (IF) or total hip replacement (THR) are required to restore
patient mobility after hip fractures. Conventionally, this decision
was based solely upon the degree of fracture displacement. However,
in the last ten years, there has been a move to incorporate patient
characteristics into the decision making process. Research demonstrating
that joint replacement renders superior functional results when compared
with IF, in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures, has
swayed the pendulum in favour of THR. However, a high risk of dislocation
has always been the concern. Fortunately, there are newer technologies
and alternative surgical approaches that can help reduce the risk
of dislocation. The authors propose an algorithm for the treatment
of femoral neck fractures: if minimally displaced, in the absence
of hip joint arthritis, IF should be performed; if arthritis is
present, or the fracture is displaced, then THR is preferred. Cite this article:
Orientation of the native acetabular plane as defined by the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) and the posterior labrum was measured intra-operatively using computer-assisted navigation in 39 hips. In order to assess the influence of alignment on impingement, the range of movement was calculated for that defined by the TAL and the posterior labrum and compared with a standard acetabular component position (abduction 45°/anteversion 15°). With respect to the registration of the plane defined by the TAL and the posterior labrum, there was moderate interobserver agreement (r = 0.64, p <
0.001) and intra-observer reproducibility (r = 0.73, p <
0.001). The mean acetabular component orientation achieved was abduction of 41° (32° to 51°) and anteversion of 18° (−1° to 36°). With respect to the Lewinnek safe zone (abduction 40° ±10°, anteversion 15° ±10°), 35 of the 39 acetabular components were within this zone. However, there was no improvement in the range of movement (p = 0.94) and no significant difference in impingement (p = 0.085). Alignment of the acetabular component with the TAL and the posterior labrum might reduce the variability of acetabular component placement in total hip replacement. However, there is only a moderate interobserver agreement and intra-observer reliability in the alignment of the acetabular component using the TAL and the posterior labrum. No reduction in impingement was found when the acetabular component was aligned with the TAL and the posterior labrum, compared with a standard acetabular component position.
Conventional uncemented femoral implants provide
dependable long-term fixation in patients with a wide range of functional
requirements. Yet challenges associated with proximal–distal femoral
dimensional mismatch, preservation of bone stock, and minimally
invasive approaches have led to exploration into alternative implant designs.
Short stem designs focusing on a stable metaphyseal fit have emerged
to address these issues in total hip replacement (THR). Uncemented
metaphyseal-engaging short stem implants are stable and are associated
with proximal bone remodeling closer to the metaphysis when compared
with conventional stems and they also have comparable clinical performances.
Short stem metaphyseal-engaging implants can meet the goals of a
successful THR, including tolerating a high level of patient function,
as well as durable fixation. Cite this article:
Orientation of the acetabular component influences
wear, range of movement and the incidence of dislocation after total
hip replacement (THR). During surgery, such orientation is often
referenced to the anterior pelvic plane (APP), but APP inclination
relative to the coronal plane (pelvic tilt) varies substantially
between individuals. In contrast, the change in pelvic tilt from
supine to standing (dPT) is small for nearly all individuals. Therefore,
in THR performed with the patient supine and the patient’s coronal
plane parallel to the operating table, we propose that freehand placement
of the acetabular component placement is reliable and reflects standing
(functional) cup position. We examined this hypothesis in 56 hips
in 56 patients (19 men) with a mean age of 61 years (29 to 80) using
three-dimensional CT pelvic reconstructions and standing lateral
pelvic radiographs. We found a low variability of acetabular component
placement, with 46 implants (82%) placed within a combined range
of 30° to 50° inclination and 5° to 25° anteversion. Changing from
the supine to the standing position (analysed in 47 patients) was associated
with an anteversion change <
10° in 45 patients (96%). dPT was
<
10° in 41 patients (87%). In conclusion, supine THR appears
to provide reliable freehand acetabular component placement. In
most patients a small reclination of the pelvis going from supine
to standing causes a small increase in anteversion of the acetabular component Cite this article:
The effect of timing of a manipulation under
anaesthetic (MUA) and injection of corticosteroid and local anaesthetic for
the treatment of frozen shoulder has attracted little attention
to date. All studies describe a period of conservative treatment
before proceeding to an MUA. Delay has been associated with a poorer
outcome. We present a retrospective review of a prospectively collected,
single-surgeon, consecutive series of 246 patients with a primary
frozen shoulder treated by MUA within four weeks of presentation.
The mean duration of presenting symptoms was 28 weeks (6 to 156),
and time to initial post-operative assessment was 26 days (5 to
126). The Oxford shoulder score (OSS) improved by a mean of 16 points
(Wilcoxon signed-ranks test,
p <
0.001) with a mean OSS at this time of 43 (7 to 48). Linear
regression analysis showed no correlation between the duration of
presenting symptoms and OSS at initial follow-up
(R2 <
0.001) or peri-operative change in OSS (R2 <
0.001)
or OSS at long-term follow-up
(R2 <
0.03). Further analysis at a mean of 42 months (8 to 127)
revealed a sustained improvement with a mean OSS of 44 (16 to 48). A good outcome follows an MUA and injection of corticosteroid
and local anaesthetic in patients with primary frozen shoulder,
independent of the duration of the presenting symptoms, and this
improvement is maintained in the long term.
When the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy is performed through an anterior approach, the ischial and retroacetabular osteotomies and manual fracture of the incompletely osteotomised ischium are conducted with an incomplete view resulting in increased risk and morbidity. We have assessed the dual anteroposterior approach which appears to address this deficiency. We compared the results of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy performed in 11 patients (13 osteotomies) through a single anterior approach with those in 12 patients (13 osteotomies) in whom the procedure was carried out through a dual anteroposterior approach. The estimated blood loss, the length of anaesthesia, duration of surgery and radiological parameters were measured. The mean operative time and length of anaesthesia were not significantly different in the two groups (p = 0.781 and p = 0.698, respectively). The radiological parameters improved to a similar extent in both groups after the operation but there was significantly less blood loss in the dual osteotomy group (p = 0.034). The dual anteroposterior approach provides a direct view of the retroacetabular and ischial parts of the osteotomy, within a reasonable operating time and with minimal blood loss and gives a satisfactory outcome.
