T-cells are considered to play an important role in the inflammatory response causing arthroplasty failure. The study objectives were to investigate the composition and distribution of CD4+ T-cell phenotypes in the peripheral blood (PB) and synovial fluid (SF) of patients undergoing revision surgery for failed metal-on-metal (MoM) and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) hip arthroplasties, and in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty. In this prospective case-control study, PB and SF were obtained from 22 patients (23 hips) undergoing revision of MoM (n = 14) and MoP (n = 9) hip arthroplasties, with eight controls provided from primary hip osteoarthritis cases awaiting arthroplasty. Lymphocyte subtypes in samples were analysed using flow cytometry.Objectives
Methods
We investigated the changes seen on serial metal
artefact reduction magnetic resonance imaging scans (MARS-MRI) of
metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (MoM THAs). In total 155
THAs, in 35 male and 100 female patients (mean age 70.4 years, 42
to 91), underwent at least two MRI scans at a mean interval of 14.6
months (2.6 to 57.1), at a mean of 48.2 months (3.5 to 93.3) after
primary hip surgery. Scans were graded using a modification of the
Oxford classification. Progression of disease was defined as an
increase in grade or a minimum 10% increase in fluid lesion volume
at second scan. A total of 16 hips (30%) initially classified as
‘normal’ developed an abnormality on the second scan. Of those with
‘isolated trochanteric fluid’ 9 (47%) underwent disease progression,
as did 7 (58%) of ‘effusions’. A total of 54 (77%) of hips initially
classified as showing adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) progressed,
with higher rates of progression in higher grades. Disease progression
was associated with high blood cobalt levels or an irregular pseudocapsule
lining at the initial scan. There was no association with changes
in functional scores. Adverse reactions to metal debris in MoM THAs
may not be as benign as previous reports have suggested. Close radiological
follow-up is recommended, particularly in high-risk groups. Cite this article:
Hip resurfacing has been proposed as an alternative
to traditional total hip arthroplasty in young, active patients.
Much has been learned following the introduction of metal-on-metal resurfacing
devices in the 1990s. The triad of a well-designed device, implanted
accurately, in the correct patient has never been more critical
than with these implants. Following Food and Drug Administration approval in 2006, we studied
the safety and effectiveness of one hip resurfacing device (Birmingham
Hip Resurfacing) at our hospital in a large, single-surgeon series.
We report our early to mid–term results in 1333 cases followed for
a mean of 4.3 years (2 to 5.7) using a prospective, observational
registry. The mean patient age was 53.1 years (12 to 84); 70% were
male and 91% had osteoarthritis. Complications were few, including
no dislocations, no femoral component loosening, two femoral neck
fractures (0.15%), one socket loosening (0.08%), three deep infections
(0.23%), and three cases of metallosis (0.23%). There were no destructive
pseudotumours. Overall survivorship at up to 5.7 years was 99.2%. Aseptic survivorship
in males under the age of 50 was 100%. We believe this is the largest
United States series of a single surgeon using a single resurfacing
system. Cite this article:
Hips with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (MoM THA) have a high rate of adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR), often associated with hypersensitivity reactions. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) measures tissue perfusion with the parameter Ktrans (volume transfer constant of contrast agent). Our purpose was 1) to evaluate the feasibility of DCE-MRI in patients with THA and 2) to compare DCE-MRI in patients with MoM bearings with metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) bearings, hypothesising that the perfusion index Ktrans in hips with MoM THA is higher than in hips with MoP THA. In this pilot study, 16 patients with primary THA were recruited (eight MoM, eight MoP). DCE-MRI of the hip was performed at 1.5 Tesla (T). For each patient, Ktrans was computed voxel-by-voxel in all tissue lateral to the bladder. The mean Ktrans for all voxels was then calculated. These values were compared with respect to implant type and gender, and further correlated with clinical parameters.Objectives
Methods
Lately, concerns have arisen following the use of large metal-on-metal bearings in hip replacements owing to reports of catastrophic soft-tissue reactions resulting in implant failure and associated complications. This review examines the literature and contemporary presentations on current clinical dilemmas in metal-on-metal hip replacement.
Femoral stems with exchangeable (modular) necks were introduced
to offer surgeons an increased choice when determining the version,
offset and length of the femoral neck during total hip arthroplasty
(THA). It was hoped that this would improve outcomes and reduce
complications, particularly dislocation. In 2010, the Australian Orthopaedic
Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) first
reported an increased rate of revision after primary THA using femoral
stems with an exchangeable neck. The aim of this study was to provide
a more comprehensive up-to-date analysis of primary THA using femoral
stems with exchangeable and fixed necks. The data included all primary THA procedures performed for osteoarthritis
(OA), reported to the AOANJRR between 01 September 1999 and 31 December
2014. There were 9289 femoral stems with an exchangeable neck and
253 165 femoral stems with a fixed neck. The characteristics of
the patients and prostheses including the bearing surface and stem/neck
metal combinations were examined using Cox proportional hazard ratios
(HRs) and Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship. Aims
Materials and Methods
The cause of fracture of the femoral neck after hip resurfacing is poorly understood. In order to evaluate the role of avascular necrosis we compared 19 femoral heads retrieved at revision for fracture of the femoral neck and 13 retrieved for other reasons. We developed a new technique of assessing avascular necrosis in the femoral head by determining the percentage of empty osteocyte lacunae present. Femoral heads retrieved as controls at total hip replacement for osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis had 9% ( In the fracture group the percentage of empty lacunae was 71% ( We conclude that fracture after resurfacing of the hip is associated with a significantly greater percentage of empty osteocyte lacunae within the trabecular bone. This indicates established avascular necrosis and suggests that damage to the blood supply at the time of surgery is a potent risk factor for fracture of the femoral neck after hip resurfacing.
A possible solution for the management of proximal femoral bone
loss is a modular femoral endoprosthesis (EPR). Although the outcome
of EPRs in tumour surgery has been well described, the outcome of
their use in revision hip surgery has received less attention. The
aim of this study was to describe the outcome of using EPR for non-neoplastic
indications. A retrospective review of 79 patients who underwent 80 EPRs for
non-neoplastic indications was performed, including the rates of
complication and survival and the mean Oxford Hip Scores (OHS),
at a mean of five years post-operatively. The mean age at the time
of surgery was 69 years (28 to 93) and the mean number of previous operations
on the hip was 2.4 (0 to 17). The most common indications for EPR
implantation were periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 40),
periprosthetic fracture (n = 12) and failed osteosynthesis of a
proximal femoral fracture or complex trauma (n = 11).Objectives
Methods
We undertook a retrospective cohort study to
determine clinical outcomes following the revision of metal-on-metal (MoM)
hip replacements for adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD), and
to identify predictors of time to revision and outcomes following
revision. Between 1998 and 2012 a total of 64 MoM hips (mean age
at revision of 57.8 years; 46 (72%) female; 46 (72%) hip resurfacings
and 18 (28%) total hip replacements) were revised for ARMD at one specialist
centre. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (1.0 to 14.6) from revision
for ARMD there were 13 hips (20.3%) with post-operative complications
and eight (12.5%) requiring re-revision. The Kaplan–Meier five-year survival rate for ARMD revision was
87.9% (95% confidence interval 78.9 to 98.0; 19 hips at risk). Excluding
re-revisions, the median absolute Oxford hip score (OHS) following
ARMD revision using the percentage method (0% best outcome and 100%
worst outcome) was 18.8% (interquartile range (IQR) 7.8% to 48.3%),
which is equivalent to 39/48 (IQR 24.8/48 to 44.3/48) when using
the modified OHS. Histopathological response did not affect time
to revision for ARMD (p = 0.334) or the subsequent risk of re-revision
(p = 0.879). Similarly, the presence or absence of a contralateral
MoM hip bearing did not affect time to revision for ARMD (p = 0.066)
or the subsequent risk of re-revision (p = 0.178). Patients revised to MoM bearings had higher rates of re-revision
(five of 16 MoM hips re-revised; p = 0.046), but those not requiring
re-revision had good functional results (median absolute OHS 14.6%
or 41.0/48). Short-term morbidity following revision for ARMD was
comparable with previous reports. Caution should be exercised when choosing
bearing surfaces for ARMD revisions. Cite this article:
Surface hip replacement (SHR) is generally used
in younger, active patients as an alternative conventional total
hip replacement in part because of the ability to preserve femoral
bone. This major benefit of surface replacement will only hold true
if revision procedures of SHRs are found to provide good clinical
results. A retrospective review of SHR revisions between 2007 and 2012
was presented, and the type of revision and aetiologies were recorded.
There were 55 SHR revisions, of which 27 were in women. At a mean
follow-up of 2.3 years (0.72 to 6.4), the mean post-operative Harris
hip score (HHS) was 94.8 (66 to 100). Overall 23 were revised for mechanical
reasons, nine for impingement, 13 for metallosis, nine for unexplained
pain and one for sepsis. Of the type of revision surgery performed,
14 were femoral-only revisions; four were acetabular-only revisions,
and 37 were complete revisions. We did not find that clinical scores were significantly different
between gender or different types of revisions. However, the mean
post-operative HHS was significantly lower in patients revised for
unexplained pain compared with patients revised for mechanical reasons
(86.9 (66 to 100) Based on the overall clinical results, we believe that revision
of SHR can have good or excellent results and warrants a continued
use of the procedure in selected patients. Close monitoring of these
patients facilitates early intervention, as we believe that tissue
damage may be related to the duration of an ongoing problem. There
should be a low threshold to revise a surface replacement if there
is component malposition, rising metal ion levels, or evidence of
soft-tissue abnormalities. Cite this article:
Large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements
(THR) have given rise to concern. Comparative studies of small-head
MoM THRs over a longer follow-up period are lacking. Our objective
was to compare the incidence of complications such as infection,
dislocation, revision, adverse local tissue reactions, mortality
and radiological and clinical outcomes in small-head (28 mm) MoM
and ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) THRs up to 12 years post-operatively. A prospective cohort study included 3341 THRs in 2714 patients.
The mean age was 69.1 years (range 24 to 98) and 1848 (55.3%) were
performed in women, with a mean follow-up of 115 months (18 to 201).
There were 883 MoM and 2458 CoP bearings. Crude incidence rates
(cases/1000 person-years) were: infection 1.3 In conclusion, we found similar results for small-head MoM and
CoP bearings up to ten years post-operatively, but after ten years
MoM THRs had a higher risk of all-cause revision. Furthermore, the
presence of an adverse response to metal debris seen in the small-head
MOM group at revision is a cause for concern. Cite this article:
We investigated whether blood metal ion levels could effectively
identify patients with bilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR)
implants who have adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). Metal ion levels in whole blood were measured in 185 patients
with bilateral BHRs. Patients were divided into those with ARMD
who either had undergone a revision for ARMD or had ARMD on imaging
(n = 30), and those without ARMD (n = 155). Receiver operating characteristic
analysis was used to determine the optimal thresholds of blood metal
ion levels for identifying patients with ARMD.Aims
Patients and Methods
We compared the medium-term clinical and radiological results of hybrid total hip replacement (THR) with metal-on-metal Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) in two groups of 54 young patients matched for age, gender, body mass index and pre-operative levels of activity. The clinical outcome was assessed by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the EuroQol scores. Radiologically, all hips were assessed for migration and osteolysis, the hybrid THRs for polyethylene wear and the BHRs for a pedestal sign. The mean follow-up of the patients with a hybrid THR was ten years and for those with a BHR, nine years. Four patients with a hybrid THR and one with a BHR had died. In each group five were lost to follow-up. The revision rate of the hybrid THRs was 16.7% (9 of 54) and of the BHRs 9.3% (5 of 54) (p = 0.195). Radiographs of a further eight hybrid THRs demonstrated wear and osteolysis, and they await revision (p = 0.008). Of the unrevised BHRs 90% had radiological changes, of which approximately 50% had progressed over the previous four years. All hybrid THRs demonstrated linear polyethylene wear with a mean of 1.24 mm (0.06 to 3.03). The BHRs recorded superior OHS (p = 0.013), UCLA (p = 0.008), and EuroQol visual analogue scores (p = 0.009). After nine years, patients with BHRs remained more active and had a lower rate of revision than those with hybrid THRs. Both groups demonstrated progressive radiological changes at medium-term follow-up.
There is increasing global awareness of adverse
reactions to metal debris and elevated serum metal ion concentrations
following the use of second generation metal-on-metal total hip
arthroplasties. The high incidence of these complications can be
largely attributed to corrosion at the head-neck interface. Severe
corrosion of the taper is identified most commonly in association
with larger diameter femoral heads. However, there is emerging evidence
of varying levels of corrosion observed in retrieved components
with smaller diameter femoral heads. This same mechanism of galvanic
and mechanically-assisted crevice corrosion has been observed in
metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic components, suggesting an inherent
biomechanical problem with current designs of the head-neck interface. We provide a review of the fundamental questions and answers
clinicians and researchers must understand regarding corrosion of
the taper, and its relevance to current orthopaedic practice. Cite this article:
Modular junctions are ubiquitous in contemporary hip arthroplasty. The head-trunnion junction is implicated in the failure of large diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) hips which are the currently the topic of one the largest legal actions in the history of orthopaedics (estimated costs are stated to exceed $4 billion). Several factors are known to influence the strength of these press-fit modular connections. However, the influence of different head sizes has not previously been investigated. The aim of the study was to establish whether the choice of head size influences the initial strength of the trunnion-head connection. Ti-6Al-4V trunnions (n = 60) and two different sizes of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) heads (28 mm and 36 mm; 30 of each size) were used in the study. Three different levels of assembly force were considered: 4 kN; 5 kN; and 6 kN (n = 10 each). The strength of the press-fit connection was subsequently evaluated by measuring the pull-off force required to break the connection. The statistical differences in pull-off force were examined using a Kruskal–Wallis test and two-sample Mann–Whitney U test. Finite element and analytical models were developed to understand the reasons for the experimentally observed differences.Objectives
Materials and Methods
Blood metal ions have been widely used to investigate
metal-on-metal hip replacements, but their ability to discriminate
between well-functioning and failed hips is not known. The Medicines
and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has suggested a
cut-off level of 7 parts per billion (ppb). We performed a pair-matched, case-control study to investigate
the sensitivity and specificity of blood metal ion levels for diagnosing
failure in 176 patients with a unilateral metal-on-metal hip replacement.
We recruited 88 cases with a pre-revision, unexplained failed hip
and an equal number of matching controls with a well-functioning
hip. We investigated the 7 ppb cut-off level for the maximum of
cobalt or chromium and determined optimal mathematical cut-off levels
from receiver-operating characteristic curves. The 7 ppb cut-off level for the maximum of cobalt or chromium
had a specificity of 89% and sensitivity 52% for detecting a pre-operative
unexplained failed metal on metal hip replacement. The optimal cut-off
level for the maximum of cobalt or chromium was 4.97 ppb and had
sensitivity 63% and specificity 86%. Blood metal ions had good discriminant ability to separate failed
from well-functioning hip replacements. The MHRA cut-off level of
7 ppb provides a specific test but has poor sensitivity.
We sought to establish the incidence of joint failure secondary to adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in a large, three surgeon, multicentre study involving 4226 hips with a follow-up of 10 to 142 months. Three implants were studied: the Articular Surface Replacement; the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing; and the Conserve Plus. Retrieved implants underwent analysis using a co-ordinate measuring machine to determine volumetric wear. There were 58 failures associated with ARMD. The median chromium and cobalt concentrations in the failed group were significantly higher than in the control group (p <
0.001). Survival analysis showed a failure rate in the patients with Articular Surface Replacement of 9.8% at five years, compared with <
1% at five years for the Conserve Plus and 1.5% at ten years for the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. Two ARMD patients had relatively low wear of the retrieved components. Increased wear from the metal-on-metal bearing surface was associated with an increased rate of failure secondary to ARMD. However, the extent of tissue destruction at revision surgery did not appear to be dose-related to the volumetric wear.
