As adverse events related to metal on metal hip
arthroplasty have been better understood, there has been increased
interest in toxicity related to the high circulating levels of cobalt ions.
However, distinguishing true toxicity from benign elevations in
cobalt levels can be challenging. The purpose of this review is
to examine the use of cobalt alloys in total hip arthroplasty, to
review the methods of measuring circulating cobalt levels, to define
a level of cobalt which is considered pathological and to review
the pathophysiology, risk factors and treatment of cobalt toxicity.
To the best of our knowledge, there are 18 published cases where
cobalt
The June 2013 Research Roundup. 360 . looks at: a contact patch to rim distance and
We conducted a retrospective study to assess
the prevalence of adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) in patients
operated on at our institution with metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip
replacements with 36 mm heads using a Pinnacle acetabular shell.
A total of 326 patients (150 males, 175 hips; 176 females, 203 hips)
with a mean age of 62.7 years (28 to 85) and mean follow-up of 7.5
years (0.1 to 10.8) participating in our in-depth modern MoM follow-up
programme were included in the study, which involved recording whole
blood cobalt and chromium ion measurements, Oxford hip scores (OHS)
and plain radiographs of the hip and targeted cross-sectional imaging. Elevated
blood
Bioengineering reasons for increased wear and failure of metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings in hip prostheses have been described. Low wear occurs in MoM hips when the centre of the femoral head is concentric with the centre of the acetabular component and the implants are correctly positioned. Translational or rotational malpositioning of the components can lead to the contact-patch of the femoral component being displaced to the rim of the acetabular component, resulting in a ten- to 100-fold increase in wear and
Objectives. The high revision rates of the DePuy Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) and the DePuy ASR XL (the total hip arthroplasty (THA) version) have led to questions over the viability of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip joints. Some designs of MoM hip joint do, however, have reasonable mid-term performance when implanted in appropriate patients. Investigations into the reasons for implant failure are important to offer help with the choice of implants and direction for future implant designs. One way to assess the performance of explanted hip prostheses is to measure the wear (in terms of material loss) on the joint surfaces. Methods. In this study, a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) was used to measure the wear on five failed cementless Biomet Magnum/ReCap/ Taperloc large head MoM THAs, along with one Biomet ReCap resurfacing joint. Surface roughness measurements were also taken. The reason for revision of these implants was pain and/or adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) and/or elevated blood
Ceramic-on-metal (CoM) is a relatively new bearing
combination for total hip arthroplasty (THA) with few reported outcomes.
A total of 287 CoM THAs were carried out in 271 patients (mean age
55.6 years (20 to 77), 150 THAs in female patients, 137 in male)
under the care of a single surgeon between October 2007 and October
2009. With the issues surrounding metal-on-metal bearings the decision
was taken to review these patients between March and November 2011,
at a mean follow-up of 34 months (23 to 45) and to record pain,
outcome scores, radiological analysis and blood ion levels. The
mean Oxford Hip Score was 19.2 (12 to 53), 254 patients with 268
hips (95%) had mild/very mild/no pain, the mean angle of inclination
of the acetabular component was 44.8. o. (28. o. to
63. o. ), 82 stems (29%) had evidence of radiolucent lines
of >
1 mm in at least one Gruen zone and the median levels of cobalt
and chromium ions in the blood were 0.83 μg/L (0.24 μg/L to 27.56 μg/L)
and 0.78 μg/L (0.21 μg/L to 8.84 μg/L), respectively. The five-year
survival rate is 96.9% (95% confidence interval 94.7% to 99%). Due to the presence of radiolucent lines and the higher than
expected levels of
The August 2012 Knee Roundup. 360. looks at: meniscal defects and a polyurethane scaffold; which is best between a single or double bundle; OA of the knee; how to resolve anterior knee pain; whether yoga can be bad for your menisci;
Patients from a randomised trial on resurfacing
hip arthroplasty (RHA) (n = 36, 19 males; median age 57 years, 24
to 65) comparing a conventional 28 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty
(MoM THA) (n = 28, 17 males; median age 59 years, 37 to 65) and
a matched control group of asymptomatic patients with a 32 mm ceramic-on-polyethylene
(CoP) THA (n = 33, 18 males; median age 63 years, 38 to 71) were
cross-sectionally screened with metal artefact reducing sequence-MRI
(MARS-MRI) for pseudotumour formation at a median of 55 months (23
to 72) post-operatively. MRIs were scored by consensus according
to three different classification systems for pseudotumour formation. . Clinical scores were available for all patients and metal ion
levels for MoM bearing patients. . Periprosthetic lesions with a median volume of 16 mL (1.5 to
35.9) were diagnosed in six patients in the RHA group (17%), one
in the MoM THA group (4%) and six in the CoP group (18%). The classification
systems revealed no clear differences between the groups. Solid
lesions (n = 3) were exclusively encountered in the RHA group. Two patients
in the RHA group and one in the MoM THA group underwent a revision
for pseudotumour formation. There was no statistically significant
relationship between clinical scoring,
Aims. Many case reports and small studies have suggested that cobalt
ions are a potential cause of cardiac complications, specifically
cardiomyopathy, after metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty
(THA). The impact of
The aim of this study was to establish the natural
course of unrevised asymptomatic pseudotumours after metal-on-metal
(MoM) hip resurfacing during a six- to 12-month follow-up period.
We used repeated metal artefact reduction sequence (MARS)-magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI), serum
Tribocorrosion at the head–neck taper interface
– so-called ‘taperosis’ – may be a source of
Recently, the use of metal-on-metal articulations
in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has led to an increase in adverse
events owing to local soft-tissue reactions from
This study reports on ceramic-on-metal (CoM) bearings in total hip replacement. Whole blood
Early failure associated with adverse reactions to metal debris is an emerging problem after hip resurfacing but the exact mechanism is unclear. We analysed our entire series of 660 metal-on-metal resurfacings (Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR)) and large-bearing ASR total hip replacements, to establish associations with metal debris-related failures. Clinical and radiological outcomes,
We carried out metal artefact-reduction MRI, three-dimensional CT measurement of the position of the component and inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis of cobalt and chromium levels in whole blood on 26 patients with unexplained pain following metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty. MRI showed periprosthetic lesions around 16 hips, with 14 collections of fluid and two soft-tissue masses. The lesions were seen in both men and women and in symptomatic and asymptomatic hips. Using three-dimensional CT, the median inclination of the acetabular component was found to be 55° and its positioning was outside the Lewinnek safe zone in 13 of 16 cases. Using inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry, the levels of blood
The presence of pseudotumours, which are soft-tissue masses relating to the hip, after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty has been associated with elevated levels of
A total of 219 hips in 192 patients aged between
18 and 65 years were randomised to 28-mm metal-on-metal uncemented
total hip replacements (THRs, 107 hips) or hybrid hip resurfacing
(HR, 112 hips). At a mean follow-up of eight years (6.6 to 9.3)
there was no significant difference between the THR and HR groups
regarding rate of revision (4.0% (4 of 99) vs 5.8%
(6 of 104), p = 0.569) or re-operation rates without revision (5.1%
(5 of 99) vs 2.9% (3 of 104), p = 0.428). In the
THR group one recurrent dislocation, two late deep infections and
one peri-prosthetic fracture required revision, whereas in the HR
group five patients underwent revision for femoral head loosening
and one for adverse reaction to metal debris. The mean University
of California, Los Angeles activity scores were significantly higher
in HR (7.5 (. sd. 1.7) vs 6.9 (. sd. 1.7),
p = 0.035), but similar mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis
Index scores were obtained (5.8 (. sd. 9.5) in HR vs 5.1
(. sd. 8.9) in THR, p = 0.615) at the last follow-up. Osteolysis
was found in 30 of 81 THR patients (37.4%), mostly in the proximal
femur, compared with two of 83 HR patients (2.4%) (p <
0.001).
At five years the mean
The survivorship of contemporary resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip using metal-on-metal bearings is better than that of first generation designs, but short-term failures still occur. The most common reasons for failure are fracture of the femoral neck, loosening of the component, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, reaction to metal debris and malpositioning of the component. In 2008 the Australian National Joint Registry reported an inverse relationship between the size of the head component and the risk of revision in resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Hips with a femoral component size of ≤ 44 mm have a fivefold increased risk of revision than those with femoral components of ≥ 55 mm irrespective of gender. We have reviewed the literature to explore this observation and to identify possible reasons including the design of the implant, loading of the femoral neck, the orientation of the component, the production of wear debris and the effects of
Surface hip replacement (SHR) is generally used
in younger, active patients as an alternative conventional total
hip replacement in part because of the ability to preserve femoral
bone. This major benefit of surface replacement will only hold true
if revision procedures of SHRs are found to provide good clinical
results. A retrospective review of SHR revisions between 2007 and 2012
was presented, and the type of revision and aetiologies were recorded.
There were 55 SHR revisions, of which 27 were in women. At a mean
follow-up of 2.3 years (0.72 to 6.4), the mean post-operative Harris
hip score (HHS) was 94.8 (66 to 100). Overall 23 were revised for mechanical
reasons, nine for impingement, 13 for metallosis, nine for unexplained
pain and one for sepsis. Of the type of revision surgery performed,
14 were femoral-only revisions; four were acetabular-only revisions,
and 37 were complete revisions. We did not find that clinical scores were significantly different
between gender or different types of revisions. However, the mean
post-operative HHS was significantly lower in patients revised for
unexplained pain compared with patients revised for mechanical reasons
(86.9 (66 to 100) versus 99 (96 to 100); p = 0.029).
There were two re-revisions for infection in the entire cohort. Based on the overall clinical results, we believe that revision
of SHR can have good or excellent results and warrants a continued
use of the procedure in selected patients. Close monitoring of these
patients facilitates early intervention, as we believe that tissue
damage may be related to the duration of an ongoing problem. There
should be a low threshold to revise a surface replacement if there
is component malposition, rising
Metal-on-metal total hip replacement has been targeted at younger patients with anticipated long-term survival, but the effect of the production of