Metal ions generated from joint replacements are a cause for concern. There is no consensus on the best surrogate measure of metal ion exposure. This study investigates whether serum and whole blood concentrations can be used interchangeably to report results of cobalt and chromium ion concentrations.

Concentrations of serum and whole blood were analysed in 262 concurrent specimens using high resolution inductively-coupled plasma mass-spectrometry. The agreement was assessed with normalised scatterplots, mean difference and the Bland and Altman limits of agreement.

The wide variability seen in the normalised scatterplots, in the Bland and Altman plots and the statistically significant mean differences between serum and whole blood concentrations suggest that they cannot be used interchangeably. A bias was demonstrated for both ions in the Bland-Altman plots. Regression analysis provided a possible conversion factor of 0.71 for cobalt and 0.48 for chromium. However, even when the correction factors were applied, the limits of agreement were greater than ±67% for cobalt and greater than ±85% for chromium, suggesting that serum and whole blood cannot be used interconvertibly. This suggests that serum metal concentrations are not useful as a surrogate measure of systemic metal ion exposure.

The recent resurgence in the use of metal-on-metal bearings has led to fresh concerns over metal wear and elevated systemic levels of metal ions.

In order to establish if bearing diameter influences the release of metal ions, we compared the whole blood levels of cobalt and chromium (at one year) and the urinary cobalt and chromium output (at one to three and four to six years) following either a 50 mm or 54 mm Birmingham hip resurfacing or a 28 mm Metasul total hip replacement. The whole blood concentrations and daily output of cobalt and chromium in these time periods for both bearings were in the same range and without significant difference.