We compared extrusion of the
We report 11 patients having revision of total hip arthroplasty using massive structural
Infection of a total hip replacement (THR) requires component removal and thorough local debridement. Usually, long-term antibiotic treatment in conjunction with a two-stage revision is required. This may take several months. One-stage revision using antibiotic-loaded cement has not gained widespread use, although the clinical and economic advantages are obvious.
Soaking bone grafts in a bisphosphonate solution before implantation can prevent their resorption and increase the local bone density in rats and humans. However, recent studies suggest that pre-treatment of
Between April 1992 and November 1998 we used 34 massive proximal femoral
Fresh-frozen
Femoral impaction bone
We determined the midterm survival, incidence
of peri-prosthetic fracture and the enhancement of the width of
the femur when combining struts and impacted bone
We report the clinical and radiographic outcomes
of 208 consecutive femoral revision arthroplasties performed in 202
patients (119 women, 83 men) between March 1991 and December 2007
using the X-change Femoral Revision System, fresh-frozen morcellised
allograft and a cemented polished Exeter stem. All patients were
followed prospectively. The mean age of the patients at revision
was 65 years (30 to 86). At final review in December 2013 a total
of 130 patients with 135 reconstructions (64.9%) were alive and
had a non re-revised femoral component after a mean follow-up of
10.6 years (4.7 to 20.9). One patient was lost to follow-up at six
years, and their data were included up to this point.
Re-operation for any reason was performed in 33 hips (15.9%), in
13 of which the femoral component was re-revised (6.3%). The mean
pre-operative Harris hip score was 52 (19 to 95) (n = 73) and improved
to 80 (22 to 100) (n = 161) by the last follow-up. Kaplan–Meier
survival with femoral re-revision for any reason as the endpoint
was 94.9% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 90.2 to 97.4) at ten years;
with femoral re-revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint it was
99.4% (95% CI 95.7 to 99.9); with femoral re-operation for any reason
as the endpoint it was 84.5% (95% CI 78.3 to 89.1); and with subsidence ≥ 5
mm it was 87.3% (95% CI 80.5 to 91.8). Femoral revision with the
use of impaction
From 1984 to 1988 we implanted 127 massive
We reviewed the clinical and radiological results of 131 patients who underwent acetabular revision for aseptic loosening with impacted bone
We evaluated 38 hip reconstructions in 36 patients at a mean follow-up of 5.9 years (range 4 to 9.1) after femoral head
Six massive femoral
Bone-ACL-bone
The early results of revision osteoarticular
We analysed the histological findings in 1146 osteoarthritic femoral heads which would have been considered suitable for bone-bank donation to determine whether pathological lesions, other than osteoarthritis, were present. We found that 91 femoral heads (8%) showed evidence of disease. The most common conditions noted were chondrocalcinosis (63 cases), avascular necrosis (13), osteomas (6) and malignant tumours (one case of low-grade chondrosarcoma and two of well-differentiated lymphocytic lymphoma). There were two with metabolic bone disease (Paget’s disease and hyperparathyroid bone disease) and four with inflammatory (rheumatoid-like) arthritis. Our findings indicate that occult pathological conditions are common and it is recommended that histological examination of this regularly used source of bone
Low-grade surface tumours of bone may theoretically be treated by hemicortical resection, retaining part of the circumference of the cortex. An inlay
Fresh osteochondral
Aims. The purpose of this retrospective study was to differentiate
between the MRI features of normal post-operative change and those
of residual or recurrent disease after intralesional treatment of
an atypical cartilage tumour (ACT)/grade I chondrosarcoma. Patients and Methods. We reviewed the case notes, radiology and histology of 75 patients,
who had been treated for an ACT/grade I chondrosarcoma by curettage,
phenolisation and bone
We report the results of using impacted cancellous