We assessed the reproducibility and accuracy of four ratios used to measure patellar height, namely the Blackburne-Peel, Caton-Deschamps, Insall-Salvati and modified Insall-Salvati, before and after total knee arthroplasty. The patellar height was measured, by means of the four ratios, on the pre- and post-operative lateral radiographs of 44 patients (45 knees) who had undergone total knee arthroplasty. Two independent observers measured the films sequentially, in identical conditions, totalling 720 measurements per observer. Statistical analysis, comparing both observers and ratios, was carried out using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Before operation there was greater interobserver variation using either the Insall-Salvati or modified Insall-Salvati ratios than when using the Caton-Deschamps or Blackburne-Peel methods. This was because of difficulty in identifying the insertion of the patellar tendon. Before operation, there was a minimal difference in reliability between these methods. After operation the interobserver difference was greatly reduced using both the Caton-Deschamps and Blackburne-Peel methods, which use the prosthetic joint line, compared with the Insall-Salvati and modified Insall-Salvati, which reference from the insertion of the patellar tendon. The theoretical advantage of using the Insall-Salvati and modified Insall-Salvati ratios in measuring
We prospectively assessed the benefits of using either a range-of-movement technique or an anatomical landmark method to determine the rotational alignment of the tibial component during total knee replacement. We analysed the cut proximal tibia intraoperatively, determining anteroposterior axes by the range-of-movement technique and comparing them with the anatomical anteroposterior axis. We found that the range-of-movement technique tended to leave the tibial component more internally rotated than when anatomical landmarks were used. In addition, it gave widely variable results (mean 7.5°; 2° to 17°), determined to some extent by which posterior reference point was used. Because of the wide variability and the possibilities for error, we consider that it is inappropriate to use the range-of-movement technique as the sole method of determining alignment of the tibial component during total knee replacement.
We have examined the differences in clinical outcome of total knee replacement (TKR) with and without patellar resurfacing in a prospective, randomised study of 181 osteoarthritic knees in 142 patients using the Profix total knee system which has a femoral component with features considered to be anatomical and a domed patellar implant. The procedures were carried out between February 1998 and November 2002. A total of 159 TKRs in 142 patients were available for review at a mean of four years (3 to 7). The patients and the clinical evaluator were blinded in this prospective study. Evaluation was undertaken annually by an independent observer using the knee pain scale and the Knee Society clinical rating system. Specific evaluation of anterior knee pain, stair-climbing and rising from a seated to a standing position was also undertaken. No benefit was shown of TKR with patellar resurfacing over that without resurfacing with respect to any of the measured outcomes. In 22 of 73 knees (30.1%) with and 18 of 86 knees (20.9%) without patellar resurfacing there was some degree of anterior knee pain (p = 0.183). No revisions related to the patellofemoral joint were performed in either group. Only one TKR in each group underwent a re-operation related to the patellofemoral joint. A significant association between knee flexion contracture and anterior knee pain was observed in those knees with patellar resurfacing (p = 0.006).
