Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 41 - 44 of 44
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 93-B, Issue 2 | Pages 145 - 150
1 Feb 2011
Ng CY McQueen MM

The fracture most commonly treated by orthopaedic surgeons is that of the distal radius. However, as yet there is no consensus on what constitutes an ‘acceptable’ radiological position before or after treatment. This should be defined as the position that will predict good function in the majority of cases. In this paper we review the radiological indices that can be measured in fractures of the distal radius and try to identify potential predictors of functional outcome. In patients likely to have high functional demands, we recommend that the articular reconstruction be achieved with less than 2 mm of gap or step-off, the radius be restored to within 2 mm of its normal length, and that carpal alignment be restored. The ultimate aim of treatment is a pain-free, mobile wrist joint without functional limitation.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1271 - 1275
1 Oct 2008
Downing ND Karantana A

The recent development of locking-plate technology has led to a potential revolution in the management of fractures of the distal radius. This review examines the evidence for pursuing anatomical restoration of the distal radius and the possible advantages and pitfalls of using volar locking plates to achieve this goal. The available evidence for adopting volar locking plates is presented and a number of important and, as yet unanswered, questions are highlighted.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1038 - 1045
1 Aug 2005
Robinson AHN Limbers JP


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 6 | Pages 829 - 836
1 Jun 2005
Kreder HJ Hanel DP Agel J McKee M Schemitsch EH Trumble TE Stephen D

A total of 179 adult patients with displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius was randomised to receive indirect percutaneous reduction and external fixation (n = 88) or open reduction and internal fixation (n = 91). Patients were followed up for two years. During the first year the upper limb musculoskeletal function assessment score, the SF-36 bodily pain sub-scale score, the overall Jebsen score, pinch strength and grip strength improved significantly in all patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the radiological restoration of anatomical features or the range of movement between the groups.

During the period of two years, patients who underwent indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation had a more rapid return of function and a better functional outcome than those who underwent open reduction and internal fixation, provided that the intra-articular step and gap deformity were minimised.